Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

In-Webo vs i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

i-Sprint AccessMatrix Unive...
Ranking in Authentication Systems
41st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Single Sign-On (SSO) (29th), Access Management (27th)
In-Webo
Ranking in Authentication Systems
40th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of i-Sprint AccessMatrix Universal Access Management is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of In-Webo is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Authentication Systems
 

Featured Reviews

NO
A stable and scalable solution with reasonable pricing
The solution has high support capability.  The tool needs to improve its cloud service capability.  I have been working with the solution for 15 years.  I would rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.  I would rate the tool's scalability a ten out of ten since it is highly scalable. We…
Use In-Webo?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

AccessMatrix Universal Access Management
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

IRAS, Singapore Bank
Deloitte, Groupama, Carrefour, Renater, Accor, Samsung, Sodexo, Pixia, Affirm, Safran, Locarchives
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.