No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Hunters vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Hunters
Ranking in SOC as a Service
6th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (37th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (33rd)
Palo Alto Networks Cortex X...
Ranking in SOC as a Service
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the SOC as a Service category, the mindshare of Hunters is 3.1%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is 5.8%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
SOC as a Service Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR5.8%
Hunters3.1%
Other91.1%
SOC as a Service
 

Featured Reviews

VikramSingh8 - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Delivery Manager at Accenture
Advanced detectors streamline threat monitoring with many use cases
Hunter support is functional yet not exceptional. Their support engineers could be more advanced and faster in providing solutions. Their turnaround time could improve to match other tools. When feedback is provided, they consider it and indicate if it is in the development stage. They commit to fixing bugs and developing the module or feature, however, take quite a lot of time. I would rate their customer support as needing improvement. Another area needing improvement is integration capabilities, as they are not yet fully compatible. Users still have to rely on third-party software or integration tools. Furthermore, they should incorporate more GenAI capabilities, a current buzzword, and enable predictive use cases. Their tools should be capable of reading the environment, making adaptations, and automatically tweaking settings as per client or environmental needs, similar to capabilities provided by other SIEM tools.
EricRise - PeerSpot reviewer
Noc Network Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees
Automation playbooks have reduced soc noise and now streamline daily incident response
To improve Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, there can be a learning curve to it. It is not a very user-friendly product; it is complex. It handles debugs and automation playbooks. You have to really spend some time dedicated to learning the product, scripting, and acquiring your certifications on it. Cost is another item as well. That can be quite significant; it does depend on other tools for EDR, whether you are using Palo Alto's XDR system or any number of third-party products for that. There are some reporting and logging restrictions and limitations. Some of those are going to be constraints, including window size limits. Database use with it has limited scalability for that type of application.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Other SIEM tools base their license cost on the volume of data processed, often charging by how much TB or GB data is processed. Hunter, however, charges based on the number of data sources and the number of data entities integrated, which saves money."
"Hunter proactively provides a set of five to six hundred use cases, categorized based on cloud use cases, endpoint use cases, parameter use cases, and malicious use cases."
"The most valuable feature is automation, as there is a huge variety of automation that can help any team and there is a threat model."
"From the security team's standpoint, the solution has improved our organization's overall cybersecurity."
"The set of playbooks that XSOAR already has inside it is really huge, and it is also great for a lot of informational security managers and engineers that can just choose what they need and not have to create anything from scratch."
"The product can automate security tasks."
"The playbook automation helped streamline my incident response time by removing delays from the human side and reducing the mean time to respond."
"Palo Alto has reduced the time that it takes to go through the process of investigating a reported abuse."
"Palo Alto has gotten the investigators more presence to actually go in the report because being that the platform will email the investigator that it's been assigned to, now the investigators will jump in there and start going through the review process a lot quicker."
"It’s easy to install."
 

Cons

"Hunter support is functional yet not exceptional."
"Hunter support is functional yet not exceptional. Their support engineers could be more advanced and faster in providing solutions."
"I did notice some drawbacks, as it is a bit complex."
"It's quite lagging and not very fast."
"The solution is not a Palo Alto product so technical support is inadequate."
"The integration could be better. Cortex, for example, does not work with iPhone."
"The user interface (UI) is quite heavy and takes time to load, which is a major drawback."
"The solution should be made a bit cheaper."
"We need a little hands-on experience to install the solution."
"The platform’s setup procedures could be streamlined compared to one of its competitors."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing a nine."
"It is expensive."
"Cortex XSOAR's price could be lower."
"The price of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is comparable to other solutions in the market."
"The solution's pricing needs improvement."
"My company did not make any payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product since we were only using its pilot version."
"There is a yearly license required for this solution and it is expensive."
"Palo Alto offers significant discounts to customers who purchase the products repeatedly."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SOC as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
11%
Construction Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business26
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise33
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Hunters?
Hunter support is functional yet not exceptional. Their support engineers could be more advanced and faster in providing solutions. Their turnaround time could improve to match other tools. When fe...
What is your primary use case for Hunters?
Hunter is a very new SIEM in the market. It is definitely a broad market for us as they are trying to establish a new place against competitors like Splunk and QRadar. This makes it challenging to ...
What advice do you have for others considering Hunters?
Their knowledge base is good. When starting with Hunter, ensure you have one or two sessions to understand navigation, features, and modules, along with obtaining proper documentation. This will he...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
We can quantify the reduction. It is more than sixty to seventy percent reduction in the MTTR, as per documents from Palo Alto, and with proper implementation, we can improve MTTR by up to sixty-fi...
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
The negative aspect of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is the price; cost-wise, it is a bit higher. Other than enterprise clients, they might need to push their management to get additional approva...
What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
We are a partner for Palo Alto as a service provider. Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is used as a SIEM solution or XDR-type solutions.
 

Also Known As

Hunters.AI
Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

We're happy to support organizations like Booking.com, ChargePoint, Yext, Red Ventures and Cimpress who leverage Hunters SOC Platform to transform their security teams' operations.
Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
Find out what your peers are saying about Arctic Wolf Networks, LevelBlue, Palo Alto Networks and others in SOC as a Service. Updated: October 2026.
921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.