HPE System Management Homepage vs Icinga comparison

HPE System Management Homepage

Read 17 Icinga reviews

3,873 Views
2,053 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 6, 2024

HPE System Management Homepage and Icinga compete in system management and monitoring. Icinga has the upper hand due to its plugin versatility and open-source flexibility.

Features: HPE System Management Homepage is valued for its hardware monitoring, integration with HPE products, and detailed system health insights. Icinga stands out with its plugin versatility, monitoring flexibility, and support for multiple environments.

Room for Improvement: Users of HPE System Management Homepage suggest enhancing the alert system, improving the interface, and simplifying setup procedures. Icinga users call for better documentation, more intuitive configuration, and an improved notification system.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE System Management Homepage deployment is praised for its integration with HPE environments but criticized for its complexity. Customer service receives mixed reviews, with some users experiencing delays. Icinga's deployment is appreciated for its flexibility in various environments, though initial setup can be challenging without extensive documentation. Icinga's community support is strong, yet formal support services can be limited.

Pricing and ROI: HPE System Management Homepage incurs higher setup costs, which some users find justified given its detailed hardware monitoring, though ROI is mixed due to ongoing maintenance costs. Icinga's lower setup costs and open-source nature provide a favorable ROI for cost-conscious users.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE System Management Homepage vs. Icinga Report (Updated: September 2025).

HPE System Management Homepage vs. Icinga

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE System Management Homepage

Ranking in Server Monitoring

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Icinga

Ranking in Server Monitoring

11th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (19th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th), Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Server Monitoring category, the mindshare of HPE System Management Homepage is 1.6%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Icinga is 7.8%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Server Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Icinga	7.8%
HPE System Management Homepage	1.6%
Other	90.6%

Server Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Juan Esteban

Consultant at Freelance

Offers reliability and helps with the virtualization part

The product integrates with our company's existing IT infrastructure, especially when it comes to MicroK8s and other on-premises servers. The tool also helps with the virtualization in the ecosystem of our company, where there are other tools from HPE. Performance and network optimization are some of the beneficial areas in terms of server management. Speaking about how the remote management ability of the product impacted our company's IT operations, I would say that my organization has dealt with areas like RDP, DDI, and DMC, depending on the requirements of our final customers. In my experience, the product has contributed four hours in terms of reliability and to ensure the uptime of our servers. When it comes to the day-to-day use of HPE System Management's interface, I would say that it connects with some of the best tools and Hyper-V console with the help of Microsoft. I recommended the solution to those who plan to use it. I rate the overall product an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Harrison Bulley

Senior Infrastructure Engineer at Net Consulting

A stable, scalable and cost-effective solution that helps with inbuilt scripts for easy modification

I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure."

"The managing and monitoring are the solution's most valuable features. They are something I find quite helpful in my work."

"This is a good product and I recommend it."

"This solution has improved our organization through the provision of efficient resource utilization and capacity planning."

"I think it's stable, scalable, and flexible."

"The interface is in continuous development and improves version by version."

"The value of Icinga is that it has hundreds of plugins, so it's really easy to monitor pretty much anything."

"Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features."

"It is really easy in Icinga to create your own plugin and integrate it without any fuss. And it works just perfectly fine."

"An affordable solution for small organizations to do basic network monitoring."

"The ability to customize scripts and build your own queries to request information from the infrastructure elements you want to monitor. This level of personalization and customization is highly appreciated."

"The drafts are easy but what I like about Icinga is that there are many add-ons that you can download."

"I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually."

"We have found the solution to be stable."

More Icinga pros

Cons

"The return on investment report is too difficult to understand."

"The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"Our customers would like to see the price lowered."

"I think that support integration could be improved."

"If the solution could provide better integration to make it easier to manage everything on different servers, that would be helpful. Whatever servers a company has, be it IBM, Dell, etc., if the System Management could be a platform that links all of them together, it would make management across different server types easier."

"The quality of service and support for this solution needs to be improved."

"There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved."

"The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users."

"Icinga’s automation could be improved."

"At this time, the layout of the website is a bit difficult. It should be more user-friendly for changing the background and logos."

"It needs Trap SNMP. I saw the documentation for Zabbix, that it has its own built-in product which handles SNMP traps, and there's nothing similar in Icinga or Nagios. I think this feature is most important for me."

"The solution lacks many features important to higher-level IT management and network support."

"The user interface should be improved."

"I think the software is quite good, but we have had problems with getting it to recognize certain areas and amend certain checks, where we needed so we would have to create backend scripts for those checks. Though, being open source, it has the support to create backend scripts, it would be better to have these scripts in-built."

More Icinga cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product."

"The license was included when we purchased the server."

"The support is yearly-based and the license is permanent."

"The price of this product is fair."

"We're using the free version of Icinga."

"It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low."

"Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."

"The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."

"It's an open-source solution."

"The solution is free to use."

"The solution is cheap."

"This is an open-source solution with paid support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Retailer

10%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about HPE System Management?

The product's initial setup phase is easy with the help of the framework consisting of Microsoft Azure.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE System Management?

My company has invested 30,00,000 USD in the product.

What needs improvement with HPE System Management?

The product should increase the processing capacity and allow speedy deployment, as both of them are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required.

What do you like most about Icinga?

The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Icinga?

It is cost-effective, and the return on investment can be very interesting because the price is low. If you want to include this product in the services you offer to your customers, the return on i...

What needs improvement with Icinga?

There is room for improvement in multi-tenancy. It's not perfect, not even really good. It's average, but it should be improved. For instance, multi-tenancy for monitoring the virtual infrastructur...

Lenovo XClarity Controller vs HPE System Management Homepage

Comparisons

Compared 63% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 13% of the time

Tanium vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs HPE System Management Homepage

Compared 12% of the time

More HPE System Management Homepage Competitors

Zabbix vs Icinga

Compared 38% of the time

Nagios Core vs Icinga

Compared 18% of the time

Checkmk vs Icinga

Compared 11% of the time

Nagios XI vs Icinga

Compared 5% of the time

LibreNMS vs Icinga

Compared 3% of the time

More Icinga Competitors

Product Reports

Server Monitoring

Download HPE System Management Homepage product report

Download Icinga product report

Also Known As

HP System Management

Icinga Cloud Monitoring

Overview

The HPE System Management Homepage (SMH) consolidates and simplifies the management of ProLiant and Integrity servers running Microsoft Windows or Linux, or HPE 9000 and HPE Integrity servers running HP-UX 11i. By aggregating data from HPE Insight Management Agents and other tools, SMH provides a secure and intuitive interface to review in-depth hardware configuration and status data, performance metrics, system thresholds and software version control information. SMH can also be used to access the HPE Lights-Out Management processor on ProLiant and Integrity servers. SMH is part of the Service Pack for ProLiant (SPP) or the Integrity Support Pack (ISP), and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional plug-in tools. SMH is easy to install and can be extended to meet specific system management requirements by integrating additional HPE plug-in management tools that include HPE Online Diagnostics and HPE Software Version Control Agents.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Icinga is a robust tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, known for its distributed monitoring capabilities and seamless integration with multiple platforms. It efficiently observes servers, network devices, and environments like Linux and Windows, enabling proactive issue identification and resource management.

With a focus on task delegation and clustering, Icinga offers an intuitive interface through its GUI and Icinga Director, simplifying configuration. The extensive plugin library supports diverse technologies, while the API allows automation with tools like Terraform and Ansible. Despite its strengths, users report challenges with data display in the GUI, a need for improved dashboards, and complex configuration processes. Users benefit from its SNMP alerts, email notifications, and automated incident handling, making it essential for managed service environments and enterprises.

What are the key features of Icinga?

Task Delegation: Streamlines monitoring tasks across distributed systems.
Event Handler: Enables automatic service recovery with minimal intervention.
Plugin Library: Offers extensive support for integrating diverse technologies.
API Accessibility: Facilitates automation with popular tools like Terraform.
Custom Plugins: Allows easy creation and personalization for monitoring needs.

What benefits should you consider in Icinga reviews?

Flexibility: Tailors monitoring to specific requirements with community support.
Scalability: Successfully manages growing infrastructure demands.
Proactivity: Enhances issue identification and resource allocation.
Integration: Seamlessly works with existing IT operations platforms.

Icinga is widely adopted in IT environments for monitoring servers, networks, and applications across industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Its ability to integrate with various operating systems and automation platforms makes it a versatile choice for industries prioritizing comprehensive surveillance and proactive management of their infrastructure.

Sample Customers

Infotec

Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre

HPE System Management Homepage vs. Icinga