We performed a comparison between HPE Ezmeral Container Platform and OpenShift Container Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Kubernetes, Amazon and others in Container Management."If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."
"The best feature is the management for the port life cycle, which automatically recycles, pulls, and scales up and down based on needs and requests."
"Technical support is good; they are fast and reliable."
"The banking transactions, inquiries, and account opening have been the most valuable."
"The platform is easy to scale as it supports Windows worker node."
"I have found the ability to scale up is most valuable."
"Red Hat's security throughout the stack and software supply chain is good. It is a lightweight operating system. You don't have to worry about the security patches on the system. You can update the entire environment with security patches, which is a nice feature."
"It’s user-friendly."
"The architecture is the best. The solution is scalable if you are on a container-based solution."
"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."
"Getting the solution quickly and troubleshooting quickly are both areas where I think it needs some work."
"Things are there and the documentation is there, however, there still needs to be quick guides available."
"The monitoring and logging could be improved."
"There should be a simplification of the overall cluster environment. It should require fewer resources. Just to run a simple Hello World app, it requires about seven servers, and that's just crazy. I understand that it is fully redundant, but it's prohibitively expensive to get something simple going."
"The setup process is not great."
"OpenShift needs to improve their container storage."
"The product monitoring tool does not work for us."
"It has an option to install OpenShift without connecting it to the Internet. We tried this, but it was very hard. We couldn't manage to use that option. We wanted to use it offline for installations, updates, upgrades, etc., but we didn't find the offline installation and updates easy. This could be better."
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is ranked 10th in Container Management with 1 review while OpenShift Container Platform is ranked 1st in Container Management with 17 reviews. HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is rated 7.0, while OpenShift Container Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Container Platform writes "Easy to install with good support, but the deployment of applications could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenShift Container Platform writes "Completely removes overhead for our developers in terms of managing orchestration of Kubernetes clusters". HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Kubernetes, Rancher Labs, Amazon EKS and VMware Tanzu Build Service, whereas OpenShift Container Platform is most compared with VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Amazon EKS, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Rancher Labs and Cisco Container Platform.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
