We performed a comparison between HPE Ezmeral Container Platform and OpenShift Container Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management."If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."
"The console or the GUI of OpenShift is awesome. You can do a lot of things from there. You can perform administration tasks as well as development tasks."
"It’s user-friendly."
"I think it's a pretty scalable tool...The solution's technical support has been pretty good."
"OpenShift is a user-friendly container platform with a solid GUI that helps you follow what is going on and gives you an overview of all your clusters. It's more user-friendly than the Kubernetes itself. The interface helps you learn the platform and provides access to some features or specific comments."
"It is very lightweight and can be deployed very fast, especially when it comes to containers."
"Some of the primary features we leverage in the platform have to do with how we manage the cluster configurations, the properties, and the auto-scalability. These are the features that definitely provide value in terms of reducing overhead for the developers."
"The banking transactions, inquiries, and account opening have been the most valuable."
"The usability and the developer experience. The platform has a centralized consultant that is easy to use for our development, operations and security teams."
"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."
"OpenShift needs to improve their container storage."
"One area for improvement is that we can't currently run Docker inside a container, as it clashes with security consents. It would be good if we could change that."
"It has an option to install OpenShift without connecting it to the Internet. We tried this, but it was very hard. We couldn't manage to use that option. We wanted to use it offline for installations, updates, upgrades, etc., but we didn't find the offline installation and updates easy. This could be better."
"The setup process is not great."
"OpenShift Container Platform is an expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."
"The support costs are too high."
"We've encountered challenges when transitioning applications between these environments."
"The product monitoring tool does not work for us."
HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is ranked 16th in Container Management while OpenShift Container Platform is ranked 1st in Container Management with 36 reviews. HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is rated 7.0, while OpenShift Container Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Container Platform writes "Easy to install with good support, but the deployment of applications could be simplified". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenShift Container Platform writes "Provides automation that speeds up our process by 30% and helps us achieve zero downtime". HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is most compared with Kubernetes, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Amazon EKS, Docker and Rancher Labs, whereas OpenShift Container Platform is most compared with Amazon EKS, VMware Tanzu Mission Control, Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE, Amazon Elastic Container Service and Google Kubernetes Engine.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
