HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs Panasas ActiveStor comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Panasas are both solutions in the NAS category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5, while Panasas is ranked #22. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 5.0% mindshare in N, compared to Panasas’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Panasas users who would recommend it.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Read 304 HPE 3PAR StoreServ reviews

20,721 Views
5,387 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Panasas ActiveStor

Read 2 Panasas ActiveStor reviews

1,040 Views
1,040 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Panasas ActiveStor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

HPE 3PAR StoreServ and Panasas ActiveStor are in the competitive storage solutions market. Users find HPE 3PAR to have a pricing and support advantage, while Panasas ActiveStor is preferred for its superior features.

Features: HPE 3PAR StoreServ has robust data management, high scalability, and efficient storage optimization. Panasas ActiveStor is known for high performance in computing environments, advanced parallel storage, and simplified data management. The significant difference is Panasas's specific optimization for performance-driven applications compared to 3PAR StoreServ’s versatile management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers straightforward deployment models and reliable support focusing on ease of integration. Panasas ActiveStor ensures seamless deployment tailored for complex computing demands with adaptive customer service emphasizing efficient troubleshooting. The key difference is ActiveStor’s advantage in sophisticated computing setups.

Pricing and ROI: HPE 3PAR StoreServ features competitive setup costs aimed at maximizing ROI through efficient storage utilization and moderate maintenance expenses. Panasas ActiveStor, with a higher initial cost, offers a strong ROI in high-performance sectors due to its enhanced capabilities. The distinction lies in StoreServ's better ROI for general use, while ActiveStor justifies its higher expense in demanding environments.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Ranking in NAS

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

304

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (2nd), All-Flash Storage (10th)

Panasas ActiveStor

Ranking in NAS

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the NAS category, the mindshare of HPE 3PAR StoreServ is 5.0%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panasas ActiveStor is 1.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE 3PAR StoreServ	5.0%
Panasas ActiveStor	1.8%
Other	93.2%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Saqib

System Engineer at Hybrid Tech

Uninterrupted upgrades accelerate performance with good support

I would rate the solution eight out of ten. It should be noted that in Pakistan, some parts are not readily available, and we need to import them from Singapore or other countries. We encountered an issue with a customer where the midplane failed and was not available. We had to wait for several days for a replacement, even in a 24/7 support case. Additionally, we faced motherboard failures in the customer's environment, encountering two motherboard failures simultaneously. We obtained one motherboard immediately, yet had to wait ten days for another. These issues should have been resolved promptly given the 24/7 support level.

Read full review

Mac Wang

Project Manager at Realnux

A stable solution with good performance and bandwidth

The tool's setup is not difficult. The deployment is completed within two to three days and we would require three engineers to handle the process. First, we need to install the software which can take around two to three hours. Next, comes the configuration and connection to the central network which is complex. It can take about eight to ten hours to complete.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to install."

"The product has definitely improved throughput. We are able to more efficiently see patients because all of our medical records and practice management software seems to run faster. Uploading images and charts is a lot faster. Recalling information in the exam rooms is faster. The overall throughput of data, going back and forth, is so we can more efficiently see patients, and it also helps increase our patient flow. We can see patients a lot faster, getting them in and out a lot more quickly."

"Previously, we were using EVA from HPE. When we moved to 3PAR, we noticed a reduction in footprint, reduced by more than 30%. We use the Adaptive Optimization, giving us a reduction in cost and with better performance."

"Whatever failures you have, there is no single point of failure. So, any failure, you get an alert, you have time, you plan the fix, the replacement, and so on. So your operations are intact."

"It is easy to add drives. When you add drives into it, it automatically recognizes them and spins them up."

"The ease of management is its most valuable feature. It is so much easier to manage storage on a 3PAR array than anything that we have had before."

"It is a really stable product. We have not had any major issues at the moment."

"The 3PAR is a way for us to manage our SAN fabric and have a way to do that in this very complex environment in which we operate."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pros

"We've found the product to be quite flexible."

"I am impressed with the tool's performance and bandwidth."

"The stability is excellent and we've found the product's performance to be very good."

Cons

"We've got some issues at the moment on scalability. We need to grow our data quite significantly."

"Only room for improvement would be to just abandon this product line and start with another."

"From a personal point of view, what would interest me is a mechanism that detects file-rot, i.e. that detects whether a file or sector has become corrupt; for example, as a result of copying the sector to other locations from the original location."

"Needs more flexibility and expansion, and also relocation, a cloud solution."

"Majority of the day to day management can be done via the GUI, but certain functions have to be setup via the command line interface such as AFC."

"Support has gone down a little bit in the past few years."

"We had a minor error when we were configuring this system, which initially detracted from its overall stability."

"If you want to run this solution, I would say that this product is mostly dying from my point of view."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ cons

"The solution is quite expensive."

"We have received complaints from customers that the tool is not easy to use. The tool's local technical service is slow. The solution is good for Linux customers and not for customers with other operating systems like Windows. The solution should provide storage without client software integration."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is reasonable. As compared to other solutions, it doesn't seem to be much different."

"We have seen ROI. While the costs were quite high at the time of purchase for our environment, the ease of use and the fact that it hasn't failed all the time, working fine, that makes it worth buying."

"It has greatly reduced my management overhead time."

"The tool’s price is higher compared to other products."

"The support for the solution is free for three years, then it is an additional cost. It is approximately $30,000 annually. The price includes a lot of equipment we have not only HPE 3PAR StoreServ."

"They have added features, such as the compression and duplication, which have further increased our ROI."

"The licensing fee is not cheap."

"Making the decisions to buy it can be complex."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pricing and cost advice

"The solution's price is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user182013

Federal Civ/Intel Engineering Lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 1, 2015

Measuring Up: EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR

Leading up to EMC World 2015, IT Central Station asked how I would compare EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR. Until recently, the flash storage conversation in my organization and many others has centered on XtremIO and Pure Storage, the leaders of the all-flash array (AFA) space. To that end, I've written a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

17%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	74
Large Enterprise	170

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE Primera?

HPE Primera has many great features but one of the best is that it is very easy to deploy. From an overall perspective, it is reliable, easy to set up, stable, and offers quality block storage. All...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

As a customer, I always prefer to have a lower price. Any customer will always ask for the cheaper price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

I have no specific ideas for improvement at present. We just need to verify whether our current virtual server setup is acceptable to the RBI, as they had raised questions about the VSO, ISO config...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM FlashSystem vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

Dell Unity XT vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

NetApp AFF vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

Everpure FlashArray vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 4% of the time

Dell PowerScale vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Competitors

Dell PowerScale vs Panasas ActiveStor

Compared 38% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs Panasas ActiveStor

Compared 20% of the time

Huawei OceanStor 9000 vs Panasas ActiveStor

Compared 8% of the time

CTERA Intelligent Data Platform vs Panasas ActiveStor

Compared 7% of the time

HPE StoreEasy vs Panasas ActiveStor

Compared 3% of the time

More Panasas ActiveStor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

September 2026

Download HPE 3PAR StoreServ product report

Buyer's Guide

NAS

September 2026

Download Panasas ActiveStor product report

Also Known As

HPE 3PAR Flash Storage, InServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage

ActiveStor

Overview

HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers unparalleled performance and flexibility for enterprise storage needs. It is highly valued for its manageability and advanced capabilities, making it ideal for mission-critical workloads.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a high-performance storage system known for its ease of use and robust architecture. It supports seamless upgrades and is adaptable to evolving technology, making it an excellent choice for electronic medical records, virtualization, and centralized data management. With integration capabilities supporting applications like SQL Server, VMware, and SAP, it effectively meets diverse business needs.

What are the key features of HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Ease of Use: Simplifies management tasks with an intuitive interface.
Reliability: Offers high availability and robust architecture for mission-critical workloads.
Flash Storage: Provides fast data access and improved performance.
Dynamic Provisioning: Enhances scalability and resource allocation.
Data Deduplication: Reduces storage costs by eliminating duplicate data.
Tiered Storage: Optimizes data storage with automated tiering.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Performance: Handles demanding workloads with efficiency.
Scalability: Grows with enterprise needs without compromising performance.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems and applications.
Proactive Support: Ensures smooth operation with timely updates and support.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is employed in industries like healthcare and finance, supporting applications such as Oracle databases and SAP. It enhances data processing and provides essential storage for virtual and real-time applications, meeting the rigorous demands of sectors requiring reliable and high-performance storage solutions.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Panasas ActiveStor is a high-performance storage system providing scalable and efficient data management designed for high-demand workloads. It is ideal for environments requiring robust storage capabilities with easy management and high scalability.

ActiveStor stands out in providing unmatched data throughput, reliability, and scalability, supporting diverse high-performance computing environments. It is designed to tackle demanding workloads requiring fast access to large datasets, essential for maximizing storage performance. ActiveStor integrates seamlessly, ensuring minimal downtime and ease of management for IT professionals.

What are the key features of Panasas ActiveStor?

Scalability: Handles increasing data sizes and user demands
High Throughput: Maintains consistent performance under load
Fault Tolerance: Ensures data protection with redundancy
Easy Integration: Compatible with existing infrastructures

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

Performance Improvement: Enhanced I/O speeds for faster workloads
Data Protection: Robust mechanisms to secure data integrity
Reduced Downtime: Simplified recovery processes to ensure constant availability
Cost Efficiency: Optimized resource management for better financial outcomes

Industries such as media, finance, and research benefit significantly from ActiveStor's capabilities. Its implementation aids researchers in handling complex simulations, media organizations in optimizing large file transfers, and finance sectors in processing vast datasets swiftly, all while ensuring robust data management.

Panasas

Sample Customers

Just Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MC

Advanced Mask Technology Center Airbus Argonne National Laboratory The University of Texas at Dallas School of Arts Technology and Emerging Communication Башнефть Boeing Bosch California Academy of Sciences Caltech Canon Case Western Reserve University Conoco Phillips Deluxe DirecTV Fairfield Technologies United States Federal Reserve Garvan Institute of Medical Research Goodyear Halliburton Harvard Medical School Honeywell In-Depth Geophysical Intel Kawasaki Lockheed Martin 3M Magseis Fairfield Mammal Studios The Man Group McLaren Mercedes-Benz MINES ParisTech NASA US Navy National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center NBCUniversal National Institutes of Health Nio National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Northrup Grumman Novartis Partners Healthcare Procter & Gamble PGS Pratt & Whitney Rutherford Appleton Lab Siemens Sim International Sinopec Solers Square Cnix TGS Toyota Motorsport GMBH Toppan Turner UMass Medical School United Technologies University of Georgia University of California Los Angeles University of Minnesota University of Notre Dame University of California San Diego Center for Microbiome Innovation Whiskytree

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor

September 2026

Free Report: HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.