HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs Panasas ActiveStor comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Panasas are both solutions in the NAS category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while Panasas is ranked #22. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 4.6% mindshare in N, compared to Panasas’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Panasas users who would recommend it.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Read 304 HPE 3PAR StoreServ reviews

16,773 Views
4,361 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Panasas ActiveStor

Read 2 Panasas ActiveStor reviews

853 Views
853 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Panasas ActiveStor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

HPE 3PAR StoreServ and Panasas ActiveStor are in the competitive storage solutions market. Users find HPE 3PAR to have a pricing and support advantage, while Panasas ActiveStor is preferred for its superior features.

Features: HPE 3PAR StoreServ has robust data management, high scalability, and efficient storage optimization. Panasas ActiveStor is known for high performance in computing environments, advanced parallel storage, and simplified data management. The significant difference is Panasas's specific optimization for performance-driven applications compared to 3PAR StoreServ’s versatile management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers straightforward deployment models and reliable support focusing on ease of integration. Panasas ActiveStor ensures seamless deployment tailored for complex computing demands with adaptive customer service emphasizing efficient troubleshooting. The key difference is ActiveStor’s advantage in sophisticated computing setups.

Pricing and ROI: HPE 3PAR StoreServ features competitive setup costs aimed at maximizing ROI through efficient storage utilization and moderate maintenance expenses. Panasas ActiveStor, with a higher initial cost, offers a strong ROI in high-performance sectors due to its enhanced capabilities. The distinction lies in StoreServ's better ROI for general use, while ActiveStor justifies its higher expense in demanding environments.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Ranking in NAS

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

304

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (2nd), All-Flash Storage (11th)

Panasas ActiveStor

Ranking in NAS

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the NAS category, the mindshare of HPE 3PAR StoreServ is 4.6%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panasas ActiveStor is 1.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE 3PAR StoreServ	4.6%
Panasas ActiveStor	1.7%
Other	93.7%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Saqib

System Engineer at Hybrid Tech

Uninterrupted upgrades accelerate performance with good support

I would rate the solution eight out of ten. It should be noted that in Pakistan, some parts are not readily available, and we need to import them from Singapore or other countries. We encountered an issue with a customer where the midplane failed and was not available. We had to wait for several days for a replacement, even in a 24/7 support case. Additionally, we faced motherboard failures in the customer's environment, encountering two motherboard failures simultaneously. We obtained one motherboard immediately, yet had to wait ten days for another. These issues should have been resolved promptly given the 24/7 support level.

Read full review

Mac Wang

Project Manager at Realnux

A stable solution with good performance and bandwidth

The tool's setup is not difficult. The deployment is completed within two to three days and we would require three engineers to handle the process. First, we need to install the software which can take around two to three hours. Next, comes the configuration and connection to the central network which is complex. It can take about eight to ten hours to complete.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I found it easy to deploy and simple to configure the storage."

"Our applications are now at least two to four times faster."

"The 3PAR tool is cheaper to maintain with more storage available."

"SSD, SAS and SATA disks in one box, transparent failover between datacenters, delivers performance as promised."

"This solution has allowed for massive performance acceleration of all workloads and massively increased availability (with peer persistence/transparent failover feature)."

"HPE brings all of that together: Hardware, service, and support."

"We also use dynamic optimization to go between tiers."

"The solution, stability, and the performance work well for us."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pros

"The stability is excellent and we've found the product's performance to be very good."

"We've found the product to be quite flexible."

"I am impressed with the tool's performance and bandwidth."

Cons

"The configuration and flexibility should improve."

"We have about 1.2 petabytes of storage sitting on the 3PARs at the moment replicated; we'd really like to get into data compression and deduplication on those devices, but at this stage we can do that only on the SSD in the environment and not on the remaining storage."

"The product is quite expensive."

"It needs better dedupe. It is hard for all the older generation arrays to put up dedupe because they tend to do the other stuff so much better. They have to keep the stability before any other new feature."

"I would like them to improve it so I can do firmware upgrades without downtime."

"During our migration we had a very choreographed timed execution of needing to transform virtual volumes from one level, from one tier to the next; AO wasn't necessarily getting us there."

"Their technical support is bad. I would rate it as a two out of 10."

"I would really love to see HPE add some cloud analytics."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ cons

"The solution is quite expensive."

"We have received complaints from customers that the tool is not easy to use. The tool's local technical service is slow. The solution is good for Linux customers and not for customers with other operating systems like Windows. The solution should provide storage without client software integration."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This solution is expensive. We pay every year for support. It's a lump sum because we pay for data center support services, and everything is included in one."

"Performance is at least two times, if not three times, what we had previously."

"It's a good price."

"The total cost of ownership really is worth every penny."

"The price of HPE 3PAR StoreServ is reasonable, but buying upgrade licenses are priced very high. There are additional fees."

"Take advantage of what HPE offers as far as professional services, and this will help you make the right decision."

"We have seen ROI. We are able to see more patients now, bringing more money into the practice."

"Nowadays, from a storage point of view, there are so many vendors in the market. So cost is one of the factors that pushed us to go with HPE 3PAR. Cost-wise they're pretty competitive."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pricing and cost advice

"The solution's price is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user182013

Federal Civ/Intel Engineering Lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 1, 2015

Measuring Up: EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR

Leading up to EMC World 2015, IT Central Station asked how I would compare EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR. Until recently, the flash storage conversation in my organization and many others has centered on XtremIO and Pure Storage, the leaders of the all-flash array (AFA) space. To that end, I've written a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	74
Large Enterprise	170

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE Primera?

HPE Primera has many great features but one of the best is that it is very easy to deploy. From an overall perspective, it is reliable, easy to set up, stable, and offers quality block storage. All...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

As a customer, I always prefer to have a lower price. Any customer will always ask for the cheaper price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

I have no specific ideas for improvement at present. We just need to verify whether our current virtual server setup is acceptable to the RBI, as they had raised questions about the VSO, ISO config...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM FlashSystem vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

Dell Unity XT vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

NetApp AFF vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 4% of the time

Everpure FlashArray vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 4% of the time

Dell PowerScale vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Competitors

Dell PowerScale vs Panasas ActiveStor

Compared 39% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs Panasas ActiveStor

Compared 22% of the time

Huawei OceanStor 9000 vs Panasas ActiveStor

Compared 10% of the time

IBM FlashSystem vs Panasas ActiveStor

Compared 7% of the time

HPE StoreEasy vs Panasas ActiveStor

Compared 3% of the time

More Panasas ActiveStor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

August 2026

Download HPE 3PAR StoreServ product report

Buyer's Guide

NAS

August 2026

Download Panasas ActiveStor product report

Also Known As

HPE 3PAR Flash Storage, InServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage

ActiveStor

Overview

HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers unparalleled performance and flexibility for enterprise storage needs. It is highly valued for its manageability and advanced capabilities, making it ideal for mission-critical workloads.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a high-performance storage system known for its ease of use and robust architecture. It supports seamless upgrades and is adaptable to evolving technology, making it an excellent choice for electronic medical records, virtualization, and centralized data management. With integration capabilities supporting applications like SQL Server, VMware, and SAP, it effectively meets diverse business needs.

What are the key features of HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Ease of Use: Simplifies management tasks with an intuitive interface.
Reliability: Offers high availability and robust architecture for mission-critical workloads.
Flash Storage: Provides fast data access and improved performance.
Dynamic Provisioning: Enhances scalability and resource allocation.
Data Deduplication: Reduces storage costs by eliminating duplicate data.
Tiered Storage: Optimizes data storage with automated tiering.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Performance: Handles demanding workloads with efficiency.
Scalability: Grows with enterprise needs without compromising performance.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems and applications.
Proactive Support: Ensures smooth operation with timely updates and support.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is employed in industries like healthcare and finance, supporting applications such as Oracle databases and SAP. It enhances data processing and provides essential storage for virtual and real-time applications, meeting the rigorous demands of sectors requiring reliable and high-performance storage solutions.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Panasas ActiveStor is a high-performance storage system providing scalable and efficient data management designed for high-demand workloads. It is ideal for environments requiring robust storage capabilities with easy management and high scalability.

ActiveStor stands out in providing unmatched data throughput, reliability, and scalability, supporting diverse high-performance computing environments. It is designed to tackle demanding workloads requiring fast access to large datasets, essential for maximizing storage performance. ActiveStor integrates seamlessly, ensuring minimal downtime and ease of management for IT professionals.

What are the key features of Panasas ActiveStor?

Scalability: Handles increasing data sizes and user demands
High Throughput: Maintains consistent performance under load
Fault Tolerance: Ensures data protection with redundancy
Easy Integration: Compatible with existing infrastructures

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

Performance Improvement: Enhanced I/O speeds for faster workloads
Data Protection: Robust mechanisms to secure data integrity
Reduced Downtime: Simplified recovery processes to ensure constant availability
Cost Efficiency: Optimized resource management for better financial outcomes

Industries such as media, finance, and research benefit significantly from ActiveStor's capabilities. Its implementation aids researchers in handling complex simulations, media organizations in optimizing large file transfers, and finance sectors in processing vast datasets swiftly, all while ensuring robust data management.

Panasas

Sample Customers

Just Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MC

Advanced Mask Technology Center Airbus Argonne National Laboratory The University of Texas at Dallas School of Arts Technology and Emerging Communication Башнефть Boeing Bosch California Academy of Sciences Caltech Canon Case Western Reserve University Conoco Phillips Deluxe DirecTV Fairfield Technologies United States Federal Reserve Garvan Institute of Medical Research Goodyear Halliburton Harvard Medical School Honeywell In-Depth Geophysical Intel Kawasaki Lockheed Martin 3M Magseis Fairfield Mammal Studios The Man Group McLaren Mercedes-Benz MINES ParisTech NASA US Navy National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center NBCUniversal National Institutes of Health Nio National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Northrup Grumman Novartis Partners Healthcare Procter & Gamble PGS Pratt & Whitney Rutherford Appleton Lab Siemens Sim International Sinopec Solers Square Cnix TGS Toyota Motorsport GMBH Toppan Turner UMass Medical School United Technologies University of Georgia University of California Los Angeles University of Minnesota University of Notre Dame University of California San Diego Center for Microbiome Innovation Whiskytree

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor

August 2026

Free Report: HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.