HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs Panasas ActiveStor comparison

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Panasas are both solutions in the NAS category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while Panasas is ranked #22. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 4.4% mindshare in N, compared to Panasas’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Panasas users who would recommend it.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Read 304 HPE 3PAR StoreServ reviews

15,197 Views
3,799 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Panasas ActiveStor

Read 2 Panasas ActiveStor reviews

743 Views
743 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Panasas ActiveStor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 7, 2024

HPE 3PAR StoreServ and Panasas ActiveStor are in the competitive storage solutions market. Users find HPE 3PAR to have a pricing and support advantage, while Panasas ActiveStor is preferred for its superior features.

Features: HPE 3PAR StoreServ has robust data management, high scalability, and efficient storage optimization. Panasas ActiveStor is known for high performance in computing environments, advanced parallel storage, and simplified data management. The significant difference is Panasas's specific optimization for performance-driven applications compared to 3PAR StoreServ’s versatile management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers straightforward deployment models and reliable support focusing on ease of integration. Panasas ActiveStor ensures seamless deployment tailored for complex computing demands with adaptive customer service emphasizing efficient troubleshooting. The key difference is ActiveStor’s advantage in sophisticated computing setups.

Pricing and ROI: HPE 3PAR StoreServ features competitive setup costs aimed at maximizing ROI through efficient storage utilization and moderate maintenance expenses. Panasas ActiveStor, with a higher initial cost, offers a strong ROI in high-performance sectors due to its enhanced capabilities. The distinction lies in StoreServ's better ROI for general use, while ActiveStor justifies its higher expense in demanding environments.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Ranking in NAS

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

304

Ranking in other categories

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (2nd), All-Flash Storage (11th)

Panasas ActiveStor

Ranking in NAS

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the NAS category, the mindshare of HPE 3PAR StoreServ is 4.4%, up from 3.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Panasas ActiveStor is 1.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NAS Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE 3PAR StoreServ	4.4%
Panasas ActiveStor	1.6%
Other	94.0%

NAS

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Saqib

System Engineer at Hybrid Tech

Uninterrupted upgrades accelerate performance with good support

I would rate the solution eight out of ten. It should be noted that in Pakistan, some parts are not readily available, and we need to import them from Singapore or other countries. We encountered an issue with a customer where the midplane failed and was not available. We had to wait for several days for a replacement, even in a 24/7 support case. Additionally, we faced motherboard failures in the customer's environment, encountering two motherboard failures simultaneously. We obtained one motherboard immediately, yet had to wait ten days for another. These issues should have been resolved promptly given the 24/7 support level.

Read full review

Mac Wang

Project Manager at Realnux

A stable solution with good performance and bandwidth

The tool's setup is not difficult. The deployment is completed within two to three days and we would require three engineers to handle the process. First, we need to install the software which can take around two to three hours. Next, comes the configuration and connection to the central network which is complex. It can take about eight to ten hours to complete.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature to me is its reliability."

"This solution has given us improved application uptime and performance."

"We’re pretty sure we bought the first All-Flash starter kit in the US and it’s been a huge source of success for us, stabilizing our business intelligence infrastructure and streamlining some of the processes in our ERP."

"The remote copy group failover is very useful and has helped us."

"Their support is very good."

"It is very stable. That is why we bought it."

"It's a very good system, especially the All-Flash system."

"It has met our performance and stability expectations."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pros

"I am impressed with the tool's performance and bandwidth."

"We've found the product to be quite flexible."

"The stability is excellent and we've found the product's performance to be very good."

Cons

"I think cloud integration would probably be the biggest part, because that's where everyone is going and the seamless integration between on-premise and cloud is an important part of any IT strategy today."

"I would rate the solution eight out of ten. It should be noted that in Pakistan, some parts are not readily available, and we need to import them from Singapore or other countries."

"We have had some challenges in the Arabic implementation and in migration, but for daily work, it's fine."

"We do not use Memory-Driven Flash in the old 3PAR. Perhaps we will use it in the new 3PAR. That is part of the reason why we are upgrading."

"The setup was complex from the perspective of the employees having to go through five days of training. If they simplified the administrative process of maintaining the unit, that would go a long way."

"The support at HPE is not great, but it is good."

"It needs better statistics and configuration."

"It increased performance for a while, but then, as we grew, and we did not grow significantly, performance dropped down."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ cons

"We have received complaints from customers that the tool is not easy to use. The tool's local technical service is slow. The solution is good for Linux customers and not for customers with other operating systems like Windows. The solution should provide storage without client software integration."

"The solution is quite expensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is reasonable. As compared to other solutions, it doesn't seem to be much different."

"To be more competitive, as customer, we need a more aggressive price that includes all the licenses available."

"You can't get software maintenance from a third party. You have to do it from HPE, which is a letdown."

"This solution is expensive. We pay every year for support. It's a lump sum because we pay for data center support services, and everything is included in one."

"Our licensing cost are $32,000 annually."

"The total cost of ownership really is worth every penny."

"You need to properly assess your needs before buying the solution since there are chances of overpaying. The type of configuration that you choose can make the price go higher or lower."

"Nowadays, from a storage point of view, there are so many vendors in the market. So cost is one of the factors that pushed us to go with HPE 3PAR. Cost-wise they're pretty competitive."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pricing and cost advice

"The solution's price is reasonable."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NAS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user182013

Federal Civ/Intel Engineering Lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 1, 2015

Measuring Up: EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR

Leading up to EMC World 2015, IT Central Station asked how I would compare EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR. Until recently, the flash storage conversation in my organization and many others has centered on XtremIO and Pure Storage, the leaders of the all-flash array (AFA) space. To that end, I've written a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Marketing Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	74
Large Enterprise	170

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE Primera?

HPE Primera has many great features but one of the best is that it is very easy to deploy. From an overall perspective, it is reliable, easy to set up, stable, and offers quality block storage. All...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

As a customer, I always prefer to have a lower price. Any customer will always ask for the cheaper price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

I have no specific ideas for improvement at present. We just need to verify whether our current virtual server setup is acceptable to the RBI, as they had raised questions about the VSO, ISO config...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dell Unity XT vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

IBM FlashSystem vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

NetApp AFF vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

HPE Primera vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

Everpure FlashArray vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 4% of the time

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Competitors

Dell PowerScale vs Panasas ActiveStor

Compared 36% of the time

NetApp FAS Series vs Panasas ActiveStor

Compared 24% of the time

Huawei OceanStor 9000 vs Panasas ActiveStor

Compared 12% of the time

IBM FlashSystem vs Panasas ActiveStor

Compared 9% of the time

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs Panasas ActiveStor

Compared 9% of the time

More Panasas ActiveStor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

June 2026

Download HPE 3PAR StoreServ product report

Buyer's Guide

NAS

June 2026

Download Panasas ActiveStor product report

Also Known As

HPE 3PAR Flash Storage, InServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage

ActiveStor

Overview

HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers unparalleled performance and flexibility for enterprise storage needs. It is highly valued for its manageability and advanced capabilities, making it ideal for mission-critical workloads.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a high-performance storage system known for its ease of use and robust architecture. It supports seamless upgrades and is adaptable to evolving technology, making it an excellent choice for electronic medical records, virtualization, and centralized data management. With integration capabilities supporting applications like SQL Server, VMware, and SAP, it effectively meets diverse business needs.

What are the key features of HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Ease of Use: Simplifies management tasks with an intuitive interface.
Reliability: Offers high availability and robust architecture for mission-critical workloads.
Flash Storage: Provides fast data access and improved performance.
Dynamic Provisioning: Enhances scalability and resource allocation.
Data Deduplication: Reduces storage costs by eliminating duplicate data.
Tiered Storage: Optimizes data storage with automated tiering.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Performance: Handles demanding workloads with efficiency.
Scalability: Grows with enterprise needs without compromising performance.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems and applications.
Proactive Support: Ensures smooth operation with timely updates and support.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is employed in industries like healthcare and finance, supporting applications such as Oracle databases and SAP. It enhances data processing and provides essential storage for virtual and real-time applications, meeting the rigorous demands of sectors requiring reliable and high-performance storage solutions.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Panasas ActiveStor is a high-performance storage system providing scalable and efficient data management designed for high-demand workloads. It is ideal for environments requiring robust storage capabilities with easy management and high scalability.

ActiveStor stands out in providing unmatched data throughput, reliability, and scalability, supporting diverse high-performance computing environments. It is designed to tackle demanding workloads requiring fast access to large datasets, essential for maximizing storage performance. ActiveStor integrates seamlessly, ensuring minimal downtime and ease of management for IT professionals.

What are the key features of Panasas ActiveStor?

Scalability: Handles increasing data sizes and user demands
High Throughput: Maintains consistent performance under load
Fault Tolerance: Ensures data protection with redundancy
Easy Integration: Compatible with existing infrastructures

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

Performance Improvement: Enhanced I/O speeds for faster workloads
Data Protection: Robust mechanisms to secure data integrity
Reduced Downtime: Simplified recovery processes to ensure constant availability
Cost Efficiency: Optimized resource management for better financial outcomes

Industries such as media, finance, and research benefit significantly from ActiveStor's capabilities. Its implementation aids researchers in handling complex simulations, media organizations in optimizing large file transfers, and finance sectors in processing vast datasets swiftly, all while ensuring robust data management.

Panasas

Sample Customers

Just Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MC

Advanced Mask Technology Center Airbus Argonne National Laboratory The University of Texas at Dallas School of Arts Technology and Emerging Communication Башнефть Boeing Bosch California Academy of Sciences Caltech Canon Case Western Reserve University Conoco Phillips Deluxe DirecTV Fairfield Technologies United States Federal Reserve Garvan Institute of Medical Research Goodyear Halliburton Harvard Medical School Honeywell In-Depth Geophysical Intel Kawasaki Lockheed Martin 3M Magseis Fairfield Mammal Studios The Man Group McLaren Mercedes-Benz MINES ParisTech NASA US Navy National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center NBCUniversal National Institutes of Health Nio National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Northrup Grumman Novartis Partners Healthcare Procter & Gamble PGS Pratt & Whitney Rutherford Appleton Lab Siemens Sim International Sinopec Solers Square Cnix TGS Toyota Motorsport GMBH Toppan Turner UMass Medical School United Technologies University of Georgia University of California Los Angeles University of Minnesota University of Notre Dame University of California San Diego Center for Microbiome Innovation Whiskytree

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor

June 2026

Free Report: HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Panasas ActiveStor report.

See our list of best NAS vendors.

We monitor all NAS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.