HackerOne vs Kiuwan comparison

HackerOne and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. HackerOne is ranked #29 with an average rating of 8.3, while Kiuwan is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.8. HackerOne holds a 0.2% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of HackerOne users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

HackerOne

Read 5 HackerOne reviews

118 Views
85 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

1,360 Views
949 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

HackerOne

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

HackerOne and Kiuwan are competitors in the cybersecurity and software security domain. HackerOne appears to have the upper hand in community-driven security testing and customer support, whereas Kiuwan offers superior software analytics and code security capabilities.

Features: HackerOne offers bug bounty programs, real-time collaboration with ethical hackers, and vulnerability management. Kiuwan is equipped with static application security testing, code analysis, and development workflow integration.

Room for Improvement: HackerOne could improve by expanding its automated testing features and offering more detailed analytic tools. Kiuwan might enhance user interface intuitiveness and reduce setup complexity. Both could benefit from increased documentation and tutorials.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HackerOne is straightforward to deploy and provides excellent customer service, enabling quick integration. Kiuwan offers flexibility in deployment with support for various environments and detailed documentation, although its technical support could be improved for faster resolutions.

Pricing and ROI: HackerOne is regarded as cost-effective, offering significant ROI through efficient vulnerability discovery and management. Kiuwan, despite having higher setup costs, provides robust ROI via detailed software analytics and security enhancements. HackerOne's lower initial costs contrast with Kiuwan's potential for long-term savings through comprehensive analytics.

To learn more, read our detailed HackerOne vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne vs. Kiuwan

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HackerOne

Ranking in Application Security Tools

29th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (40th), Bug Bounty Platforms (1st), Penetration Testing Services (1st), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (15th)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

27th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of HackerOne is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Faizan Nehal

dApp Auditor at Hacken

Platform supports skill development with effective vulnerability reporting

Everything has become slower on HackerOne. I have noticed that older researchers receive all the private invites while newer ones receive fewer. The same goes for real-life events, where the same people are invited repeatedly. There are no clear guidelines for being invited to programs and conferences, and the process for receiving invitations appears arbitrary.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at Deloitte

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of HackerOne is its variety of programs. These programs provide depth into various areas, such as mobile, API, and websites."

"It helps me to get new sales, profits, and other benefits."

"Apart from getting all the bug bounty opportunities, we also get the chance to practice in a safe environment, like a demo setup. These features are great for beginners who want to explore bug bounties in the future."

"HackerOne is larger than WebCloud and has a better reputation than BugCloud, which results in a smoother process."

"We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them."

"I like that I can scan the code without sending it to the Kiuwan cloud. I can do it locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the cloud. It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally."

"Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP."

"We use Kiuwan to locate the source of application vulnerabilities."

"Lifecycle features, because they permit us to show non-technical people the risk and costs hidden into the code due to bad programming practices."

"I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability."

"I've tried many open source applications and the remediation or correction actions that were provided by Kiuwan were very good in comparison."

"The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"One issue I've experienced is traffic. Many people try to participate when an opportunity with a bounty of around 1,000-15,000 dollars comes up. In this case, the first person to report the vulnerability gets the bounty. If a second person reports the same vulnerability, they are marked as duplicated instead of receiving some recognition. The second person also invested time finding the issue, so I think this can be improved."

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne. I have noticed that older researchers receive all the private invites while newer ones receive fewer."

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne."

"Response time can be improved. The HackerOne Trust team can be slow to respond sometimes. They're not using AI, which could help reduce the number of duplicate reports."

"The ability to view the conversation between the triagers and the programs will be really good."

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

"I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution."

"The development-to-delivery phase."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"Integration of the programming tools could be improved."

"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

"The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is open-source and free for bug bounty hunters."

"The solution is free."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"Check with your account manager."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HackerOne?

The cost is rated as one since there is no need to pay anything, not even a fee or commission.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HackerOne?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HackerOne?

My use case is similar to DuckTron. The processes I use for DuckTron are exactly the same for HackerOne. Therefore, there isn't much of a difference. I use HackerOne for finding vulnerabilities and...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kiuwan?

The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kiuwan?

I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kiuwan?

See all answers

Comparisons

Bugcrowd vs HackerOne

Compared 44% of the time

Intigriti vs HackerOne

Compared 17% of the time

Synack vs HackerOne

Compared 14% of the time

YesWeHack vs HackerOne

Compared 10% of the time

Cobalt vs HackerOne

Compared 4% of the time

More HackerOne Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Kiuwan

Compared 52% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs Kiuwan

Compared 6% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne

June 2025

Download HackerOne product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

June 2025

Download Kiuwan product report

Also Known As

HackerOne Assets, HackerOne Pentesting Services, HackerOne Security Assessments, HackerOne Vulnerability Management

No data available

Overview

HackerOne becomes your partner who executes all aspects of your bug bounty program, including triage, bounty pricing, and hacker relations, allowing you to fully focus on fixing vulnerabilities.

HackerOne

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Zenefits, Adobe, Yelp

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne vs. Kiuwan

June 2025

Free Report: HackerOne vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about HackerOne vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HackerOne vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.