HackerOne vs Kiuwan comparison

Why PeerSpot?

HackerOne and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. HackerOne is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.3, while Kiuwan is ranked #34. HackerOne holds a 1.0% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of HackerOne users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

HackerOne

Read 11 HackerOne reviews

8,986 Views
1,707 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

4,202 Views
3,320 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

HackerOne

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

HackerOne and Kiuwan operate in the cybersecurity and software security sectors. Kiuwan often has an edge due to its advanced static code analysis capabilities, providing deeper insights into code security and compliance.

Features:HackerOne provides robust vulnerability coordination and bug bounty programs. Its platform helps manage security threats through crowd-sourced testing, centralized report intake, and integrations with SIEM and CI/CD tools. Kiuwan delivers powerful static code analysis, modularity for specific rule creation, and automated lifecycle management. It also offers detailed reports and improves overall security policies.

Room for Improvement:HackerOne could benefit from enhanced reporting capabilities and more detailed technical guidance for its users. Additional customization options and expanding integration features might also enhance user experience. Kiuwan might improve with faster customer support times and simplifying their pricing structure for wider accessibility. Improving onboarding for new users and better API documentation could also elevate their services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:HackerOne offers a SaaS-based model simplifying deployment with highly responsive customer support, praised for quick response times. Kiuwan provides both SaaS and on-premises solutions, suiting diverse organizational needs. It is recognized for giving detailed technical guidance, making its support system highly effective.

Pricing and ROI:HackerOne is noted for a straightforward pricing model advantageous for smaller companies, delivering satisfactory ROI with efficient vulnerability management. Kiuwan's pricing is higher but justified by its comprehensive analysis and better security outcomes, offering significant ROI by improving application security and mitigating risks.

To learn more, read our detailed HackerOne vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne vs. Kiuwan

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HackerOne

Ranking in Application Security Tools

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (34th), Bug Bounty Platforms (2nd), Penetration Testing Services (2nd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (5th), AI Observability (15th)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

34th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of HackerOne is 1.0%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HackerOne	1.0%
Kiuwan	1.2%
Other	97.8%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

NitishKumar

Consultant at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Crowdsourced security has strengthened our bug discovery and improved vulnerability response

HackerOne is already doing well, although I believe implementing stricter SLAs for the time to first response and time to bounty would help prevent researchers' burnout, especially regarding duplicate submissions. I suggest systematic bug rewards because currently, if a researcher finds one bug in multiple places, they often only get paid for one. Improving the handling of systemic vulnerabilities would encourage deeper research. Additionally, improving multi-currency and crypto payout options would help make the platform more accessible globally.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the biggest strengths is combining a large community of ethical hackers with a structured platform that helps organizations discover, manage, and remediate security vulnerabilities efficiently."

"Using HackerOne has definitely improved the security of my web application, identifying security gaps I didn't realize as a web developer."

"If you have a very critical vulnerability, some good companies will acknowledge it and pay you accordingly based on severity."

"HackerOne is a very good platform with the trust of different companies including Shopify, PayPal, and Uber, which creates a stronger brand perception and competitive market positioning."

"HackerOne has been the right fit for our current situation from both a functionality and cost-effectiveness perspective."

"The fast verification process impacts my motivation significantly because a quick response keeps me motivated, and if I'm going to try and hunt bugs today, I would appreciate a response within the day or at least within a few days."

"I notice a return on investment through the group of researchers at HackerOne identifying vulnerabilities, saving us money, time, and manpower, with the efficiency of HackerOne allowing them to accomplish in three to four hours what would take two red teamers a whole day."

"HackerOne is larger than WebCloud and has a better reputation than BugCloud, which results in a smoother process."

More HackerOne pros

"It provides value by offering options to enhance both code quality and the security of the company."

"Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP."

"I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution."

"I advise using Kiuwan because it's very straightforward and totally easy to understand."

"For the moment, this is a solution that I could recommend."

"With Kiuwan, we were able to help our clients get a better visibility of their development activities and to mitigate risks."

"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the continuous integration process, which enables us to make the best in terms of security of our solution and not introduce new mistakes, with problems solved step by step."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"One limitation is that if a finding has been reported on HackerOne and was also reported earlier by another user or outsider, the platform is not able to collate that information together."

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne. I have noticed that older researchers receive all the private invites while newer ones receive fewer."

"Triage response time is a significant issue. The response time and triage speed are not fast enough, and this is causing many people to leave HackerOne."

"Response time can be improved. The HackerOne Trust team can be slow to respond sometimes. They're not using AI, which could help reduce the number of duplicate reports."

"One issue I've experienced is traffic. Many people try to participate when an opportunity with a bounty of around 1,000-15,000 dollars comes up. In this case, the first person to report the vulnerability gets the bounty. If a second person reports the same vulnerability, they are marked as duplicated instead of receiving some recognition. The second person also invested time finding the issue, so I think this can be improved."

"However, I reduced my rating by one mark because a proper internal triage team should be in place, not as a replacement for internal security controls."

"However, some things can be improved, such as better report deduplication by automatically identifying duplicate vulnerability reports more accurately."

"HackerOne provides a "HackBot" which helps identify other relevant reports, including duplicates, public reports from other companies, etc. However, the functionality is limited and it would be nice to integrate it with broader services offered like auto responses, triggers, etc."

More HackerOne cons

"The QA developer and security could be improved."

"Kiuwan's support has room for improvement. You can only open a ticket is through email, and the support team is outside of our country. They should have a support number or chat."

"The solution seems to give us a lot of false positives. This could be improved quite a bit."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"I would like to see additional languages supported."

"In Kiuwan there are sometimes duplicates found in the dependency scan under the "insights" tab. It's unclear to me why these duplicates are appearing, and it would be helpful if the application teams could investigate further."

"DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on."

"It would be beneficial to streamline calls and transitions seamlessly for improved functionality."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is open-source and free for bug bounty hunters."

"The solution is free."

"Check with your account manager."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

12%

University

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HackerOne?

I'm not very sure about pricing, setup costs, and licensing, as those are managed by our management team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HackerOne?

HackerOne can be improved, and the insights can be a little better. I chose a nine for my rating because it has very great features such as a large research community, workflow integration, analyti...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HackerOne?

My main use case for HackerOne is bug bounties and getting paid through that platform. Companies like Fastify and Oracle create bug bounties and vulnerability disclosure programs on HackerOne. Ethi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Bugcrowd vs HackerOne

Compared 13% of the time

Synack vs HackerOne

Compared 7% of the time

YesWeHack vs HackerOne

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs HackerOne

Compared 4% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs HackerOne

Compared 3% of the time

More HackerOne Competitors

SonarQube vs Kiuwan

Compared 16% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 4% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne

September 2026

Download HackerOne product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

September 2026

Download Kiuwan product report

Also Known As

HackerOne Assets, HackerOne Pentesting Services, HackerOne Security Assessments, HackerOne Vulnerability Management

No data available

Overview

HackerOne is an industry leader in offensive security, enabling companies to identify and resolve vulnerabilities using AI and a global community of researchers. Trusted by top organizations, HackerOne enhances the software development lifecycle with comprehensive security testing.

HackerOne combines artificial intelligence with a diverse community of skilled security researchers to fortify digital ecosystems. Offering bug bounty programs, vulnerability disclosure, pentesting, and AI red teaming, HackerOne supports renowned clients like General Motors, GitHub, and the U.S. Department of Defense. Its intuitive platform simplifies vulnerability reporting and tracking, providing seamless integration with third-party tools. HackerOne's role in protecting company assets is underlined by notable accolades, achieving recognition as a Best Workplace for Innovators and a coveted spot as a Most Loved Workplace for Young Professionals.

What key features does HackerOne offer?

Collaboration Tools: Enhance communication and coordination among security teams and ethical hackers.
Customizable Bounty Programs: Tailor programs to fit specific organizational needs and attract skilled researchers.
AI Capabilities: Leverage AI to detect vulnerabilities and automate workflows, boosting efficiency.
Ease of Use: Report and track vulnerabilities with a user-friendly interface, ensuring quick adoption and response.
Third-Party Integrations: Connect with external tools to streamline operations and improve report handling.

What benefits arise from using HackerOne?

Improved Security Posture: Collaborate with experts to enhance security strategies, ensuring robust defenses.
Enhanced Efficiency: Quick response times and automated processes reduce time to resolution for discovered vulnerabilities.
Comprehensive Coverage: Diverse program offerings cater to multiple sectors, empowering thorough security assessments.
Reputation Building: Collaborating with reputable partners strengthens trust and industry standing.

HackerOne is widely utilized across industries for comprehensive security testing and vulnerability management. By allowing companies to coordinate with ethical hackers, they effectively address security flaws in websites and applications. This coordination aids in regulatory compliance, protects customer trust, and serves as a central communication medium for enhancing security postures.

HackerOne

Kiuwan offers comprehensive security and vulnerability testing capabilities, focusing on code analysis, fast scanning, and detailed risk assessments. Supporting many technologies, it integrates well into development workflows to ensure code compliance and enhance code quality.

Known for its application portfolio governance, Kiuwan provides fast scanning and reporting features, alongside an intuitive interface. It supports languages from COBOL to JavaScript, offering modular capabilities and security integration for continuous deployment. Developers can perform efficient local or cloud-based scans, benefiting from action plans for better code correction. Integration with tools like Jenkins facilitates quick processing and detailed risk assessments, while challenges remain in language support expansion and smoother integration with Azure DevOps and popular IDEs. Enhanced frameworks and mobile development testing would amplify its utility, with users seeking improved navigation, report downloading, and technical support.

What are the most important features of Kiuwan?

Fast Scanning: Provides quick scans for immediate insights.
Reporting: Robust features for generating detailed reports.
Intuitive UI: Easy-to-navigate interface.
Technology Coverage: Supports a range of languages from COBOL to JS.
Tool Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Jenkins for CI/CD processes.
Modularity: Allows specific models for targeted analysis.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in Kiuwan reviews?

Enhanced Code Security: Identifies vulnerabilities swiftly and efficiently.
Continuous Integration: Facilitates ongoing security assessments.
Improved Code Compliance: Helps maintain adherence to coding standards.
Actionable Insights: Provides risk assessments with actionable recommendations.

In industries focused on software development, Kiuwan is integral for security and vulnerability assessments. It's embedded into workflows to analyze, detect and correct vulnerabilities, addressing threats like SQL injection and adhering to OWASP Top 10. The tool supports secure coding practices and performance evaluation, aiding organizations in maintaining rigorous security standards.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and the U.S. Department of Defense

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne vs. Kiuwan

September 2026

Free Report: HackerOne vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about HackerOne vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HackerOne vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.