HackerOne vs Kiuwan comparison

HackerOne and Kiuwan are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. HackerOne is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.5, while Kiuwan is ranked #28. HackerOne holds a 0.5% mindshare in AS, compared to Kiuwan’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of HackerOne users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Kiuwan users who would recommend it.

HackerOne

Read 9 HackerOne reviews

4,307 Views
431 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Kiuwan

Read 23 Kiuwan reviews

2,214 Views
1,815 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

HackerOne

Kiuwan

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

HackerOne and Kiuwan operate in the cybersecurity and software security sectors. Kiuwan often has an edge due to its advanced static code analysis capabilities, providing deeper insights into code security and compliance.

Features:HackerOne provides robust vulnerability coordination and bug bounty programs. Its platform helps manage security threats through crowd-sourced testing, centralized report intake, and integrations with SIEM and CI/CD tools. Kiuwan delivers powerful static code analysis, modularity for specific rule creation, and automated lifecycle management. It also offers detailed reports and improves overall security policies.

Room for Improvement:HackerOne could benefit from enhanced reporting capabilities and more detailed technical guidance for its users. Additional customization options and expanding integration features might also enhance user experience. Kiuwan might improve with faster customer support times and simplifying their pricing structure for wider accessibility. Improving onboarding for new users and better API documentation could also elevate their services.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:HackerOne offers a SaaS-based model simplifying deployment with highly responsive customer support, praised for quick response times. Kiuwan provides both SaaS and on-premises solutions, suiting diverse organizational needs. It is recognized for giving detailed technical guidance, making its support system highly effective.

Pricing and ROI:HackerOne is noted for a straightforward pricing model advantageous for smaller companies, delivering satisfactory ROI with efficient vulnerability management. Kiuwan's pricing is higher but justified by its comprehensive analysis and better security outcomes, offering significant ROI by improving application security and mitigating risks.

To learn more, read our detailed HackerOne vs. Kiuwan Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne vs. Kiuwan

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,444 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HackerOne

Ranking in Application Security Tools

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (29th), Bug Bounty Platforms (1st), Penetration Testing Services (2nd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (8th), AI Observability (10th)

Kiuwan

Ranking in Application Security Tools

28th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of HackerOne is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiuwan is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HackerOne	0.5%
Kiuwan	1.2%
Other	98.3%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Ruphus Muita

Senior ICT Security Consultant at Applied Principles Limited

Has improved my motivation to submit bugs consistently through fast response and clear filtering

I think HackerOne can be improved by allowing new users to gain access to certain programs that are only open to known, renowned users. Sometimes new users don't receive invites just because they are new, despite potentially being very skilled hackers, so I feel new users should get more chances and opportunities. I am currently satisfied with the rewards, response time, and other aspects of the platform, so I don't have anything else to add about the necessary improvements. I give HackerOne a nine out of ten because if new hackers are given more opportunities, it could be a perfect 10 for me. However, the reason I gave a nine is that I don't have much to complain about; I specifically love the program and don't have many concerns.

Read full review

Mustufa Bhavnagarwala

CyberRisk Solution Advisor at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement

Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran the tool and tried to scan the repository to find the security issues. The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"HackerOne is larger than WebCloud and has a better reputation than BugCloud, which results in a smoother process."

"The fast verification process impacts my motivation significantly because a quick response keeps me motivated, and if I'm going to try and hunt bugs today, I would appreciate a response within the day or at least within a few days."

"If you have a very critical vulnerability, some good companies will acknowledge it and pay you accordingly based on severity."

"It helps me to get new sales, profits, and other benefits."

"HackerOne has been the right fit for our current situation from both a functionality and cost-effectiveness perspective."

"Using HackerOne has definitely improved the security of my web application, identifying security gaps I didn't realize as a web developer."

"The most valuable feature of HackerOne is its variety of programs. These programs provide depth into various areas, such as mobile, API, and websites."

"HackerOne is a very good platform with the trust of different companies including Shopify, PayPal, and Uber, which creates a stronger brand perception and competitive market positioning."

More HackerOne pros

"I have found the security and QA in the source code to be most valuable."

"I advise using Kiuwan because it's very straightforward and totally easy to understand."

"The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report."

"The solution has a continuous integration process."

"For the moment, this is a solution that I could recommend."

"I personally like the way it breaks down security vulnerabilities with LoC at first glance."

"I like that I can scan the code without sending it to the Kiuwan cloud. I can do it locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the cloud. It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally."

"The solution offers very good technical support."

More Kiuwan pros

Cons

"HackerOne provides a "HackBot" which helps identify other relevant reports, including duplicates, public reports from other companies, etc. However, the functionality is limited and it would be nice to integrate it with broader services offered like auto responses, triggers, etc."

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne."

"One issue I've experienced is traffic. Many people try to participate when an opportunity with a bounty of around 1,000-15,000 dollars comes up. In this case, the first person to report the vulnerability gets the bounty. If a second person reports the same vulnerability, they are marked as duplicated instead of receiving some recognition. The second person also invested time finding the issue, so I think this can be improved."

"Everything has become slower on HackerOne. I have noticed that older researchers receive all the private invites while newer ones receive fewer."

"One limitation is that if a finding has been reported on HackerOne and was also reported earlier by another user or outsider, the platform is not able to collate that information together."

"Sometimes new users don't receive invites just because they are new, despite potentially being very skilled hackers, so I feel new users should get more chances and opportunities."

"Triage response time is a significant issue. The response time and triage speed are not fast enough, and this is causing many people to leave HackerOne."

"However, I reduced my rating by one mark because a proper internal triage team should be in place, not as a replacement for internal security controls."

More HackerOne cons

"Improvement could be made with the integration of the programming tools."

"The development-to-delivery phase."

"I would like to see additional languages supported."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically, but I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports because in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report."

"The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required."

"The rate of false positives, where it reports issues that are not really issues, can be improved."

"Kiuwan's support has room for improvement. You can only open a ticket is through email, and the support team is outside of our country."

More Kiuwan cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is free."

"The tool is open-source and free for bug bounty hunters."

"I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

"Nothing special. It's a very fair model."

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

"The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."

"Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."

"Check with your account manager."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HackerOne?

I have not experienced any costs since I use HackerOne independently, just logging into the site, hunting bugs, and submitting them without any expenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HackerOne?

HackerOne has trust from companies such as Shopify, PayPal, and Uber, which provides a stronger brand perception and competitive market positioning. However, I reduced my rating by one mark because...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HackerOne?

I use HackerOne for the bug bounty platform to find security issues. When we discover vulnerabilities, we receive awards for them. Before testing any new payment API for public release, we can have...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Bugcrowd vs HackerOne

Compared 33% of the time

Synack vs HackerOne

Compared 13% of the time

YesWeHack vs HackerOne

Compared 7% of the time

Intigriti vs HackerOne

Compared 5% of the time

BreachLock Penetration Testing Services vs HackerOne

Compared 4% of the time

More HackerOne Competitors

SonarQube vs Kiuwan

Compared 23% of the time

Veracode vs Kiuwan

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Kiuwan

Compared 8% of the time

GitHub vs Kiuwan

Compared 7% of the time

Snyk vs Kiuwan

Compared 6% of the time

More Kiuwan Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne

March 2026

Download HackerOne product report

Buyer's Guide

Kiuwan

March 2026

Download Kiuwan product report

Also Known As

HackerOne Assets, HackerOne Pentesting Services, HackerOne Security Assessments, HackerOne Vulnerability Management

No data available

Overview

HackerOne leads in offensive security with a platform that expertly identifies and remedies security vulnerabilities using AI and a vast researcher community. Trusted by industry giants, it integrates bug bounties, vulnerability disclosure, and code security in software development.

The HackerOne Platform offers a comprehensive suite of services, combining advanced AI technology with the skills of a global security researcher community to address complex security challenges. It facilitates an understanding of vulnerabilities, promoting better remediation practices across software lifecycles. Notable clients include Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and U.S. Department of Defense. Recognized for innovation and workplace excellence, HackerOne continues to set standards in security solutions.

What key features does HackerOne offer?

Skilled Hacker Community: Access a large pool of expert security researchers.
Third-Party Integrations: Seamless compatibility with various tools like payment systems and project management applications.
Bug Bounty Programs: Incentivized vulnerability discovery across industries.
Direct Communication: Facilitates dialogue for better understanding of vulnerabilities.
Safe Practice Environments: Supports learning for both beginners and seasoned professionals.

Why is HackerOne beneficial for your needs?

Speed of Delivery: Quickly identifies and resolves security issues.
Responsive Support: Reliable assistance enhances user experience.
Transparency in Communication: Clear reporting processes aid in issue resolution.
Income Opportunities: Bug bounties offer financial incentives.

HackerOne finds significant applications in various sectors with its focus on vulnerability assessment, testing, and responsible disclosure. Organizations utilize it for ethical hacking and efficient vulnerability coordination, making it essential in cybersecurity strategies. The platform's reliability is evident in its ability to identify and document security threats effectively.

HackerOne

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Kiuwan

Sample Customers

Anthropic, Crypto.com, General Motors, GitHub, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and the U.S. Department of Defense

DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial

Buyer's Guide

HackerOne vs. Kiuwan

March 2026

Free Report: HackerOne vs. Kiuwan

Find out what your peers are saying about HackerOne vs. Kiuwan and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HackerOne vs. Kiuwan report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.