We performed a comparison between Gurucul UEBA and LogRhythm UEBA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I appreciate the comprehensive categorization of devices based on their intended use, such as those for DNS."
"The most valuable feature of Gurucul is the ability to customize and it is on the Hadoop platform that has a lot of flexibility."
"The reporting feature was the key differentiator. I also liked the ability to create dynamic rules in the environment."
"It has a lot of features. It has file integration monitoring."
"It is easy to monitor users and that is how the solution is adding value to our firm."
"The most valuable features are file activity monitoring and registry activity monitoring."
"The tool's most valuable feature is server threat hunting."
"Good capability pinpointing specific cyber incidents."
"What I like most about LogRhythm UEBA is that it allows you to identify and analyze end-user behaviors and suspicious activities within the systems."
"LogRhythm UEBA’s best feature is the dashboard. It provides several graphs, charts, and event logs."
"The solution is useful for privilege accounts and super admin accounts. It is beneficial from a security perspective. The tool uses machine learning rather than threshold-based alerts. For instance, it can detect unusual user logins, such as a user logging in from a new browser or location."
"Gurucul can improve on the online documentation. They should educate the end users more to allow them to do everything themselves."
"It could be more stable."
"Regarding the prioritization of threats, Gurucul UEBA needs to enhance its alert severity assignment process within the system."
"The search feature needs to be improved."
"It should have better mitigation with other solutions and be tightly integrated with other solutions. It has to be improved."
"The UI could be improved a little bit."
"The cloud version is lacking and not up to par."
"LogRhythm UEBA's data aggregation needs to be improved. Open-source users do not have much documentation available. Documentation is available only for enterprise users."
"The product could be user-friendly for someone who doesn’t have any prior experience working with it."
"The product should improve its dashboards. Splunk has neat dashboards. Additionally, we would like to enhance the use cases provided by LogRhythm as its use case library is not as extensive as other tools. Its machine-learning capabilities need to improve when compared to other solutions. It lacks risk quantification in a single, transparent view for individuals such as CSOs."
"What needs improvement in LogRhythm UEBA is the pricing. Here in Asia, for example, in Sri Lanka, pricing is the primary concern, and this is the only area for improvement I see in the product."
Gurucul UEBA is ranked 11th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 3 reviews while LogRhythm UEBA is ranked 12th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) with 10 reviews. Gurucul UEBA is rated 6.6, while LogRhythm UEBA is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Gurucul UEBA writes "Helped reduce our operational costs and increase our efficiency, but it can be more user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LogRhythm UEBA writes "Detects unusual logins but dashboards need improvement ". Gurucul UEBA is most compared with Exabeam Fusion SIEM, Securonix Next-Gen SIEM, Splunk User Behavior Analytics and Wazuh, whereas LogRhythm UEBA is most compared with Wazuh, Darktrace, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trend Micro Deep Discovery and Aruba IntroSpect. See our Gurucul UEBA vs. LogRhythm UEBA report.
See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
