Grafana and Prometheus Group are leading solutions in the monitoring and visualization category. Grafana has the upper hand in visualization capabilities with its customizable dashboards and user-friendly approach.
Features:Grafana offers extensive visualization options through its detailed graphs and customizable dashboards. Its open-source integration with various APIs enhances its flexibility. Prometheus Group excels in robust metric collection, leveraging a powerful scraping mechanism and providing a broad set of functions for data integration.
Room for Improvement:Grafana could improve in aggregation capabilities, intuitive dashboard configuration, and alerting features, with a demand for better documentation and machine learning functionalities. Prometheus Group's interface and query language could be more intuitive, and its visualization aspect requires enhancement alongside error handling and comprehensive exporters.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Grafana supports on-premises, public, and hybrid cloud deployments, being versatile with strong community support. Prometheus Group is commonly deployed on-premises and public clouds, with solid documentation and community support, though Grafana shows better community engagement.
Pricing and ROI:Both Grafana and Prometheus Group offer open-source solutions, allowing for cost-efficient operation. Grafana provides enterprise and pro versions with advanced features at a cost, while both tools deliver good ROI through their feature sets and open-source nature.
Using open-source Prometheus saves me money compared to AWS native services.
My advice for people who are new to Grafana or considering it is to reach out to the community mainly, as that's the primary benefit of Grafana.
I do not use Grafana's support for technical issues because I have found solutions on Stack Overflow and ChatGPT helps me as well.
Grafana's customer support is mainly for developers.
Prometheus does not offer traditional technical support.
In assessing Grafana's scalability, we started noticing logs missing or metrics not syncing in time.
In terms of our company, the infrastructure is using two availability zones in AWS.
Prometheus is scalable, with a rating of ten out of ten.
Once you get to a higher load, you need to re-evaluate your architecture and put that into account.
When something in their dashboard does not work, because it is open source, I am able to find all the relative combinations that people are having, making it much easier for me to fix.
Deploying it on multiple instances or using Kubernetes for automatic management has enhanced its stability.
It would be better if they made the technology easy to use without needing to read extensive documentation.
I would give it a ten if it were much simpler for users who just want to get a simple objective in Grafana and are not experienced with technical configuration.
Regarding the clarity of the official documentation for installation, I think the official documentation, which has something called Alloy, the Alloy integration, is not that clear.
In an enterprise setting, pricing is reasonable, as many customers use it.
The costs associated with using Grafana are somewhere in the ten thousands because we are able to control the logs in a more efficient way to reduce it.
Prometheus is cost-effective for me as it is free.
Users can monitor metrics with greater ease, and the tool aids in quickly identifying issues by providing a visual representation of data.
The feature that sets Grafana apart from its competitors is how easy it is to set up data sources.
It's definitely useful for monitoring, alerting, logs, and analysis.
It allows me to save money by avoiding costs associated with AWS native services like CloudWatch or Amazon Prometheus.
Grafana is an open-source visualization and analytics platform that stands out in the field of monitoring solutions. Grafana is widely recognized for its powerful, easy-to-set-up dashboards and visualizations. Grafana supports integration with a wide array of data sources and tools, including Prometheus, InfluxDB, MySQL, Splunk, and Elasticsearch, enhancing its versatility. Grafana has open-source and cloud options; the open-source version is a good choice for organizations with the resources to manage their infrastructure and want more control over their deployment. The cloud service is a good choice if you want a fully managed solution that is easy to start with and scale.
A key strength of Grafana lies in its ability to explore, visualize, query, and alert on the collected data through operational dashboards. These dashboards are highly customizable and visually appealing, making them a valuable asset for data analysis, performance tracking, trend spotting, and detecting irregularities.
Grafana provides both an open-source solution with an active community and Grafana Cloud, a fully managed and composable observability offering that packages together metrics, logs, and traces with Grafana. The open-source version is licensed under the Affero General Public License version 3.0 (AGPLv3), being free and unlimited. Grafana Cloud and Grafana Enterprise are available for more advanced needs, catering to a wider range of organizational requirements. Grafana offers options for self-managed backend systems or fully managed services via Grafana Cloud. Grafana Cloud extends observability with a wide range of solutions for infrastructure monitoring, IRM, load testing, Kubernetes monitoring, continuous profiling, frontend observability, and more.
The Grafana users we interviewed generally appreciate Grafana's ability to connect with various data sources, its straightforward usability, and its integration capabilities, especially in developer-oriented environments. The platform is noted for its practical alert configurations, ticketing backend integration, and as a powerful tool for developing dashboards. However, some users find a learning curve in the initial setup and mention the need for time investment to customize and leverage Grafana effectively. There are also calls for clearer documentation and simplification of notification alert templates.
In summary, Grafana is a comprehensive solution for data visualization and monitoring, widely used across industries for its versatility, ease of use, and extensive integration options. It suits organizations seeking a customizable and scalable platform for visualizing time-series data from diverse sources. However, users should be prepared for some complexity in setup and customization and may need to invest time in learning and tailoring the system to their specific needs.
Prometheus Group specializes in robust monitoring and observability, offering comprehensive data collection, analysis, and visualization across cloud and on-premise environments. Its integration with tools like Python, Java, and Kubernetes enables users to track metrics efficiently.
Prometheus Group provides an open-source, customizable platform focused on flexibility and reliability. Its integration with Grafana enhances data visualization while supporting complex infrastructures for improved productivity. Users rely on its scalable architecture for effective monitoring and observability, aiding performance analytics and alerting. Despite its strengths, challenges with its query language and interface usability persist, along with a need for simpler setup. Enhancing documentation and reporting capabilities remains essential for broader adoption, especially among less technical users.
What are the standout features of Prometheus Group?Prometheus Group is widely implemented across industries like cloud services and IT infrastructure. Organizations monitor infrastructure, applications, and databases, utilizing its capabilities for system scalability and health checks within Azure and Amazon ecosystems. Its integration with Kubernetes supports performance monitoring and ensures reliable data analytics, fostering comprehensive metric tracking.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.