"The features that I have found most valuable are its graphs - if I need any statistics, in Kubernetes or Kong level or VPN level, I can quickly get the reports."
"The most valuable feature is the multi-cloud integration, where there is support for both GCP and AWS."
"Provides visibility into the performance uptime."
"Google's technical support is very good."
"The stability has been very good over the years."
"It is difficult to estimate in advance how much something is going to cost."
"If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it. My request goes through various levels of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and comes back to my client machine. Suppose that my request has taken 10 seconds overall, so if I want to break it down, to see where the delay is happening within my architecture, I am not able to find that out using Stackdriver."
"Lacking sufficient operations documentation."
"While we are satisfied with the overall performance, in certain cases we must add additional metrics and additional tools like Grafana and Dynatrace."
"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."
Google Stackdriver is ranked 15th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 4 reviews while Micro Focus Business Process Monitor is ranked 37th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 2 reviews. Google Stackdriver is rated 8.0, while Micro Focus Business Process Monitor is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Google Stackdriver writes "Provides visibility into the performance uptime and the overall health of our cloud applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Business Process Monitor writes "The proactive monitoring is helpful for our customers". Google Stackdriver is most compared with ELK Logstash, AWS X-Ray, Azure Monitor, Datadog and Splunk, whereas Micro Focus Business Process Monitor is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Broadcom DX Application Performance Management. See our Google Stackdriver vs. Micro Focus Business Process Monitor report.
See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
