We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Google Stackdriver vs Micro Focus Business Process Monitor comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Stackdriver vs. Micro Focus Business Process Monitor and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
564,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The features that I have found most valuable are its graphs - if I need any statistics, in Kubernetes or Kong level or VPN level, I can quickly get the reports.""The most valuable feature is the multi-cloud integration, where there is support for both GCP and AWS.""Provides visibility into the performance uptime.""Google's technical support is very good."

More Google Stackdriver Pros →

"The stability has been very good over the years."

More Micro Focus Business Process Monitor Pros →

Cons
"It is difficult to estimate in advance how much something is going to cost.""If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it. My request goes through various levels of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and comes back to my client machine. Suppose that my request has taken 10 seconds overall, so if I want to break it down, to see where the delay is happening within my architecture, I am not able to find that out using Stackdriver.""Lacking sufficient operations documentation.""While we are satisfied with the overall performance, in certain cases we must add additional metrics and additional tools like Grafana and Dynatrace."

More Google Stackdriver Cons →

"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."

More Micro Focus Business Process Monitor Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage."
  • "The cost could be lower."
  • More Google Stackdriver Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Management (APM) solutions are best for your needs.
    564,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    Google's technical support is very good.
    Top Answer: 
    The cost could be lower. When it comes to the cost component in cloud, it is problematic that we are only in a position to know how much we must pay upon arrival of the invoice after 15 days.
    Top Answer: 
    While we are satisfied with the overall performance, in certain cases we must add additional metrics and additional tools like Grafana and Dynatrace. We would like to improve the application log. Most… more »
    Top Answer: 
    The stability has been very good over the years.
    Top Answer: 
    They are flexible when it comes to the cost. If a customer has a budget constraint, Micro Focus is open to providing discounts. Other companies in this space are very expensive. Micro Focus is… more »
    Top Answer: 
    In terms of improvement, the roadmaps are not clear with Micro Focus. They should release a frequent upgrade path and roadmap that will create a clear reason for customers to identify issues.
    Ranking
    Views
    7,524
    Comparisons
    6,750
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    370
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    324
    Comparisons
    234
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    454
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging
    HPE Business Process Monitor
    Learn More
    Overview

    Google Stackdriver provides powerful monitoring, logging, and diagnostics. It equips you with insight into the health, performance, and availability of cloud-powered applications, enabling you to find and fix issues faster. It is natively integrated with Google Cloud Platform, Amazon Web Services, and popular open source packages. Stackdriver provides a wide variety of metrics, dashboards, alerting, log management, reporting, and tracing capabilities.

    Micro Focus Business Process Monitor is an application monitoring software that proactively and consistently monitors business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

    Offer
    Learn more about Google Stackdriver
    Learn more about Micro Focus Business Process Monitor
    Sample Customers
    Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games
    United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Comms Service Provider22%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Media Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company37%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Government5%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google Stackdriver vs. Micro Focus Business Process Monitor and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    564,997 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Google Stackdriver is ranked 15th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 4 reviews while Micro Focus Business Process Monitor is ranked 37th in Application Performance Management (APM) with 2 reviews. Google Stackdriver is rated 8.0, while Micro Focus Business Process Monitor is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Google Stackdriver writes "Provides visibility into the performance uptime and the overall health of our cloud applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Business Process Monitor writes "The proactive monitoring is helpful for our customers". Google Stackdriver is most compared with ELK Logstash, AWS X-Ray, Azure Monitor, Datadog and Splunk, whereas Micro Focus Business Process Monitor is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Broadcom DX Application Performance Management. See our Google Stackdriver vs. Micro Focus Business Process Monitor report.

    See our list of best Application Performance Management (APM) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Management (APM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.