Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Search Appliance [EOL] vs IBM Watson Discovery comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Search Appliance [EOL]
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Watson Discovery
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Indexing and Search (7th)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1227 - PeerSpot reviewer
Fast and efficient enterprise search application with query support in 40 different languages
A very good enterprise search application. Search results are produced pretty fast and the contents gets re-index quite often which ensures that the search results are not stale. The Administrative Interface is very easy to use and has a lot of useful information. The number of pages crawled by google search appliance is quite high compared other tools in the same domain. Another good feature of Google search appliance is that, the search index keeps getting updated for every update to any doc and removal of any doc actual clears the corresponding entry in the search index ensuring that non-existent entries don't show up in the results page. Search results can be grouped in various collections e.g. university collections, medical collections etc. Google Search Appliance very smartly handles the synonyms, as can be seen in the "narrow your search" feature. Indexing of content can be easily configured by specifying URLs
Geraldo Lima - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable, scalable, and has testing and conversational AI features
The total time it takes to deploy IBM Watson Discovery depends on the documents you'll be working with. For example, I was in a situation where I was working with some painting files and folders for a painting store. The store had PDF documents, but the information was mixed up, so I had to treat the documents on IBM Watson Discovery, and discovering and understanding each PDF file took longer. The process is more straightforward for plain documents, and you have to work with questions that will help IBM Watson Discovery understand the documents. The time to deploy the product depends on the quantity and type of documents you'll be working with.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Indexing and Search solutions are best for your needs.
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

British Airways, City of Calgary, Discovery Channel, Emerson Process Management, FINRA, GoDaddy.com, Hayneedle, Hays, Honeywell Aerospace, Honeywell Transportation, Posco, Soci_t_ G_n_rale Group
Prudential, Bradesco, Woodside
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Luigi's Box, Lucidworks and others in Indexing and Search. Updated: August 2025.
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.