Google Kubernetes Engine vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring comparison

Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Download the complete report

Helped 812,580 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Google Kubernetes Engine

Ranking in Container Management

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk Infrastructure Monit...

Ranking in Container Management

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (10th), Cloud Monitoring Software (10th)

Featured Reviews

Abhilash Gopidas

Deployment Manager at HealthEdge Software, Inc.

Mar 13, 2024

The auto-scaling feature helps during peak hours, but the support is not great

We use the solution for running microservices for different healthcare workflows like authorization claims and adjudication with no downtime and to do continuous deployments Earlier, we used an on-premise solution, so we faced downtimes. It was a monolithic architecture. Google Kubernetes Engine…

Read full review

Rodney Riettie

Software Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Jul 20, 2023

Helps to ingest a massive amount of raw data and use it effectively

A lot of customers had a hard time effectively searching within the data in Splunk. There is a learning curve from searches to indexes and using all the macros that we have created. It is a little difficult for somebody who has not used it quite a bit and does not have a lot of practice with it, but the AI features that we have been hearing about through Splunk will make it a lot easier for us to use human language to search this data. That is big. That is pretty powerful, and that will help a lot with our customers. At the Splunk conference, some of the talks have been about the AI platform and more effective and easier ways to search within Splunk through indexes and other things. These features will help correct some of the things with which we are having a hard time with some of our customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) takes care of managing Kubernetes, including the main control plane. It also offers solutions for monitoring resources and handling external traffic, which is essential for us. Being a cloud-native solution, it relieves us from worrying about these operational aspects."

"We hardly have a breakdown. It's been very stable."

"Before using this solution, it was a lot of manual tasks and a lot of people participated in the process."

"Stability-wise, this solution is really good."

"The most valuable feature of Google Kubernetes Engine is how you can automatically scale and load balance."

"The solution simplified deployment, making it more automated. Previously, Docker required manual configuration, often done by developers on their computers. However, with Google Kubernetes Engine, automation extends to configuration, deployment, scalability, and viability, primarily originating from Docker rather than Kubernetes. Its most valuable feature is the ease of configuration."

"We used automation for the initial setup. It was okay. So it wasn't too complex."

"The product has valuable security features. It can connect with multiple DevOps tools."

More Google Kubernetes Engine pros

"The most valuable feature is log reporting."

"The feature I find most valuable, is the data integration."

"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring reduces our mean time to resolve. We are more proactive than reactive."

"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring provided our customers with visibility into their overall infrastructure."

"The solution monitors attacks or unauthorized access to the information we want to protect."

"It is a great resource for us because we have so many different data sources and to be able to aggregate that and put it through a concise dashboard or an alert really helps."

"The features I have found most valuable are log searching and log analytics, both of which are quick features."

"The solution's basic visibility is one of its most valuable features. So, it is a solution that is easy to use...The solution's initial setup process was straightforward."

More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring pros

Cons

"While the GKE cluster is secure, application-level security is an essential aspect that needs to be addressed. The security provided by GKE includes the security of communication between nodes within the cluster and the basic features of Kubernetes security. However, these features may not be sufficient for the security needs of an enterprise. Additional security measures must be added to ensure adequate protection. It has become a common practice to deploy security tools within a Kubernetes cluster. It would be ideal if these tools were included as part of the package, as this is a standard requirement in the industry. Thus, application-level security should be integrated into GKE for improved security measures."

"The user interface could be improved."

"Our critique is that we have to do too much work to get the cluster production-ready."

"We would like to see some improvement in the ease of integration with this solution."

"The product's integration with third-party vendors needs improvement."

"The network configuration has to be simplified."

"The user interface is a bit confusing sometimes. You need to navigate between the various consoles we have. It's hard to figure out where things are. It's frustrating. The documentation could be a bit better."

"I would like to see the ability to create multiple notebook configurations."

More Google Kubernetes Engine cons

"It does not have a user-friendly interface and it is difficult to use."

"One thing I recently ran into was that the logs on the server most often get Gzipped after they have been rotated. We found that we were not monitoring some of the things, so we had to go back and pull them in. Right now, it pulls one at a time, untars it, or unzips it, so I cannot look at the entire history. There can be an improvement in that area."

"A lot of customers had a hard time effectively searching within the data in Splunk. There is a learning curve from searches to indexes and using all the macros that we have created. It is a little difficult for somebody who has not used it quite a bit and does not have a lot of practice with it, but the AI features that we have been hearing about through Splunk will make it a lot easier for us to use human language to search this data. That is big. That is pretty powerful, and that will help a lot with our customers."

"They do not have all the features that I expect right now."

"They can get more integration with a few more products. They can also update some of the dashboards that are in there now."

"The product collects a lot of data but it does not assure that it collects all of it."

"The deployment can be quite complex."

"The solution's stability is an area that has room for improvement. It needs to provide constant stability to its users."

More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its pricing is good. They bill us only per user. That's nice."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a nine out of ten. The tool costs around 3000 dollars per month. There are no additional costs apart from these."

"The product is a little bit expensive."

"Initially, Google Kubernetes Engine was a little bit cheaper, but now its prices have been increased compared to the pricing model and the features that are made available by its competitors."

"Pricing is a bit expensive compared to some other products, but it's acceptable."

"It is competitive, and it is not expensive. It is almost competitive with AWS and the rest of the cloud solutions. We are spending around 3K USD per month. There are four projects that are currently running, and each one is incurring a cost of around 3K USD."

"This is an open source solution, so there is no pricing or licensing."

"I would rate Kubernetes' pricing four out of five."

More Google Kubernetes Engine pricing and cost advice

"It is expensive."

"The solution's pricing is costly."

"The solution's pricing is competitive. I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten. The price of the solution could be cheaper."

"Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive."

"Splunk's infrastructure monitoring costs can be high because our billing is based on data volume measured in terabytes, rather than the number of devices being monitored."

"This is an expensive solution."

"I am not in that circle, but we are currently licensing based on our queries. That is working out for us. Previously, it was by volume of data, and now, we can store as much data as we want."

"The product is a bit expensive considering the competition but the company may negotiate the price."

More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

812,580 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Kubernetes Engine?

The product has no downtime.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Kubernetes Engine?

Pricing is always a concern. We keep running the service, and we need to pay for it. I rate the pricing a seven or eight out of ten.

What needs improvement with Google Kubernetes Engine?

The product's integration with third-party vendors needs improvement.

What do you like most about Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring?

The vibrant dashboards are valuable.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring?

Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive. Till ...

What needs improvement with Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring?

We never had any issues when it comes to the type of use cases we are using it for. We did not need more advancement on it, but I know that, in general, everything can be updated. There are tiny li...

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Comparisons

Compared 29% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 18% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 12% of the time

Kubernetes vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Google Kubernetes Engine

Compared 11% of the time

More Google Kubernetes Engine Competitors

Amazon CloudWatch vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 14% of the time

Rancher Labs vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 14% of the time

ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 13% of the time

Nagios XI vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 9% of the time

OpsRamp vs Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 8% of the time

More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Competitors

Product Reports

Google Kubernetes Engine

Download Google Kubernetes Engine product report

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring

Download Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring product report

Also Known As

GKE

Splunk Insights for Infrastructure

Learn More

Google

Splunk

Overview

Kubernetes Engine is a managed, production-ready environment for deploying containerized applications. It brings our latest innovations in developer productivity, resource efficiency, automated operations, and open source flexibility to accelerate your time to market.

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring offers features including, Instant visualization, real-time actionable alerts, centralized enterprise controls, and scalability.

Instant visualization

Get fast time to value with over 250+ cloud service integrations and pre-built dashboards out of the box for rapid, full-stack visualization. Autodiscover, break down, group, and explore clouds, services and systems in minutes.

Real-time actionable alerts

Act before infrastructure performance affects end-user experience. Instantly detect and accurately alerts on dynamic thresholds, multiple conditions and complex rules to eliminate alert storms and dramatically reduce MTTD/MTTR.

Centralized, enterprise controls

Answer business-critical questions in context and monitor service-level objectives and indicators instantly. Track custom metrics for business KPIs to token based access and usage controls.

Scale with confidence

Troubleshoot across thousands of microservices, multiple ephemeral deployments, application versions and billions of events. Release better apps faster and drive closed-loop automation for a flawless end-user experience.

Sample Customers

Philips Lighting, Alpha Vertex, GroupBy, BQ

Entrust Datacard

Google Kubernetes Engine vs. Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring