Google Compute Engine vs SAP S4HANA on AWS comparison

Google and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. Google is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.6, while Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0. Google holds a 0.9% mindshare in ISI, compared to Amazon Web Services (AWS)’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.

Google Compute Engine

Read 16 Google Compute Engine reviews

461 Views
229 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Read 41 SAP S4HANA on AWS reviews

2,208 Views
1,821 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Google Compute Engine

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Google Compute Engine and SAP S4HANA on AWS compete in cloud services. SAP S4HANA on AWS appears to have the upper hand due to its superior real-time processing and advanced analytics.

Features: Google Compute Engine offers flexible virtual machine customization, preemptible VMs for cost savings, and seamless integration with Google services for automation. SAP S4HANA on AWS provides an in-memory database, real-time data processing, and comprehensive analytics capabilities, ideal for ERP systems in financial and manufacturing sectors.

Room for Improvement: Google Compute Engine could improve its user interface, simplify security settings, and enhance intuitive auto-scaling features. SAP S4HANA on AWS is criticized for its high cost, complex integration, and a need for a more modern GUI with better support for additional cloud providers.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Google Compute Engine offers straightforward deployment on public cloud infrastructure with community-driven support, though customer support can be inconsistent. SAP S4HANA on AWS provides multiple deployment options, including hybrid and private clouds, with generally reliable support, although the setup can be complex and requires careful planning for optimal integration.

Pricing and ROI: Google Compute Engine's pay-as-you-go model offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness, particularly in development and testing environments, benefiting from integration with other Google services. SAP S4HANA on AWS is more expensive with substantial initial investments, but large enterprises find the comprehensive service quality justifies the cost for robust, integrated solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Compute Engine vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Compute Engine vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.3

Compute Engine offers initial cost savings and performance boosts, but financial benefits and precise savings remain challenging to gauge.

Sentiment score

7.4

SAP S4HANA on AWS boosts performance, efficiency, and ROI, with payback in months and long-term financial benefits.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Compute Engine report

On a very good implementation, usually, if the scale of the business is large, the implementation can give a payback within six, seven, or eight months of implementation.

AtifNajam

Group CIO at Ghulam Faruque Group

Although our investment was higher compared to the previous ERP system, we are able to derive ROI from SAP S4HANA on AWS.

SrinivasVadde

Finance Controller at kauvery

For more quotes and insights, download the SAP S4HANA on AWS report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.3

Google Compute Engine support receives mixed reviews; some praise responsiveness while others note inadequate assistance and delayed responses.

Sentiment score

6.5

SAP S4HANA on AWS support receives mixed reviews; AWS prompt, SAP varies, necessitating improvement and expertise due to complexity.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Compute Engine report

We received the right support during our implementation and continue to benefit from it.

SrinivasVadde

Finance Controller at kauvery

They have a support model available, with first-level support handling initial issues when I integrate the system.

AtifNajam

Group CIO at Ghulam Faruque Group

For more quotes and insights, download the SAP S4HANA on AWS report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

8.0

Google Compute Engine is scalable and versatile, suitable for varying workloads, with strong network and security features.

Sentiment score

7.8

SAP S4HANA on AWS provides scalable support for large enterprises, integrates well, but requires technical expertise for efficient scaling.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Compute Engine report

AWS has been running probably 96% of Fortune 500 companies across the globe, so scalability is not an issue.

AtifNajam

Group CIO at Ghulam Faruque Group

The product is versatile and can manage complexity beyond expectations.

Yasir Khalid

Project Manager at BSF

For more quotes and insights, download the SAP S4HANA on AWS report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.3

Google Compute Engine is highly reliable with a 99.99% SLA, frequently surpassing performance expectations and stability compared to competitors.

Sentiment score

7.8

SAP S4HANA on AWS is praised for stability and reliability, though performance can vary with specific setups and configurations.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Compute Engine report

As a finance controller, we have seen improvements in finance deliverables, SLAs in payables, and reconciliation timelines.

SrinivasVadde

Finance Controller at kauvery

For more quotes and insights, download the SAP S4HANA on AWS report

Room For Improvement

Google Compute Engine users seek UI enhancements, expanded options, improved security, synchronization, and better support and marketing focus.

SAP S4HANA on AWS needs better integration, cost efficiency, user-friendly interfaces, improved support, scalability, and enhanced deployment resources.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Compute Engine report

Having these integrations as a single source rather than working in silos would be beneficial for customers.

SrinivasVadde

Finance Controller at kauvery

SAP introduced flexible workflows, which are even better if I want customized workflows for my documentation within the procurement domain.

AtifNajam

Group CIO at Ghulam Faruque Group

The interface and interaction with the technical team require intensive training.

Yasir Khalid

Project Manager at BSF

For more quotes and insights, download the SAP S4HANA on AWS report

Setup Cost

Google Compute Engine offers competitive, flexible pricing, often cheaper than Azure and AWS, with savings possible through resource optimization.

SAP S4HANA on AWS is costly but offers value with flexibility, significant enterprise investment, and potential discounts.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Compute Engine report

The initial setup required a higher investment, but the return on investment has justified the cost.

SrinivasVadde

Finance Controller at kauvery

SAP is not cheap, with many hidden costs encountered during implementation.

Yasir Khalid

Project Manager at BSF

For more quotes and insights, download the SAP S4HANA on AWS report

Valuable Features

Google Compute Engine offers customizable VMs, scalability, cost-effectiveness, security features, and diverse compute and storage options.

SAP S4HANA on AWS offers a user-friendly interface, real-time processing, scalability, AI integration, and cost-effective, high-availability hosting.

In GCP, there's a custom configuration feature unlike AWS and Azure.

reviewer2602254

Senior Cloud Engineer at Sprinklr

For more quotes and insights, download the Google Compute Engine report

The costing and personnel planning integration are among the strongest areas of this solution.

AtifNajam

Group CIO at Ghulam Faruque Group

From the finance side, we have enhanced our internal controls and reduced the timeline for closing the month from a year to just two days.

SrinivasVadde

Finance Controller at kauvery

The configurations are quite comprehensive, and the product can handle many complex scenarios.

Yasir Khalid

Project Manager at BSF

For more quotes and insights, download the SAP S4HANA on AWS report

Categories and Ranking

Google Compute Engine

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

10th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP S4HANA on AWS

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

7th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of Google Compute Engine is 0.9%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP S4HANA on AWS is 3.7%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

Featured Reviews

WahyuKurniawan

Head of Software Engineering at Abarobotics.com

Reasonably priced and offers high availability features

The synchronization between two tools, meaning if I have another server outside Google Cloud, as far as I know, I cannot mimic the server in Google Cloud to another server outside Google Cloud. I don't know if Google has the above-mentioned features or not, and if it does have them, then maybe Google can help us set things right and how to make a server mimic either of the servers outside Google. With the hot swap features or if Google Cloud itself is down, we can replace the services with another server. Right now, I have another server outside Google as a backup of a production server. There should be synchronization between servers inside Google and those outside it. The high availability features in Google are only available in Google Compute Engine in different regions. If I have another server outside Google, the high availability features in Google cannot synchronize with such a server.

Read full review

AtifNajam

Group CIO at Ghulam Faruque Group

Strong integration in manufacturing and enhances flexibility with useful workflow management

Installation is very straightforward, however, implementation takes years or months based on the project's size. In manufacturing, the requirement might go from ten to 12 people. If I'm a sales-oriented company, such as an FMCG or something else, then I might need around seven or eight people at the very minimum. It is not an easy task to migrate. If I'm moving from a different ERP to S/4HANA, I need a proper project that probably spans several months, with significant engagement from both the business side and the technical side. I need an opportunity partner on it. Processing to SCE S/4HANA takes a bit of effort.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

27%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Compute Engine?

Everything is simple and useful. The initial setup is not challenging.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Compute Engine?

Google resources are cheaper compared to AWS and Microsoft Azure. Among the three, Google is the cheapest option.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Compute Engine?

Google has a lack of focus on their products. They have many products in various areas of the market, but they do not productize or appeal to the market effectively. They should concentrate on prod...

See all answers

What do you like most about SAP S4HANA on AWS?

With extensive data and a sizable client base, this ensures seamless operations, responsiveness, and overall reliability, addressing our enterprise-scale needs effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP S4HANA on AWS?

The initial setup required a higher investment, but the return on investment has justified the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP S4HANA on AWS?

Currently, we have some integration areas like Concur and Ariba that could be improved. Having these integrations as a single source rather than working in silos would be beneficial for customers.

See all answers

Comparisons

VMware Cloud Foundation vs Google Compute Engine

Compared 32% of the time

Amazon EC2 vs Google Compute Engine

Compared 19% of the time

Tencent Cloud vs Google Compute Engine

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Google Compute Engine

Compared 15% of the time

Google Cloud vs Google Compute Engine

Compared 14% of the time

More Google Compute Engine Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 69% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 7% of the time

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon AWS vs SAP S4HANA on AWS

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP S4HANA on AWS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Compute Engine

June 2025

Download Google Compute Engine product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP S4HANA on AWS

June 2025

Download SAP S4HANA on AWS product report

Also Known As

No data available

SAP S/4HANA on AWS

Overview

Google Compute Engine delivers virtual machines running in Google's innovative data centers and worldwide fiber network. Compute Engine's tooling and workflow support enable scaling from single instances to global, load-balanced cloud computing.

Compute Engine's VMs boot quickly, come with persistent disk storage, and deliver consistent performance. Our virtual servers are available in many configurations including predefined sizes or the option to create Custom Machine Types optimized for your specific needs. Flexible pricing and automatic sustained use discounts make Compute Engine the leader in price/performance.

Google

SAP customers of all sizes can fully realize all the benefits of the SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud. With SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition on the AWS Cloud you can:

Achieve faster time to value with the AWS on-demand infrastructure
Rapidly provision infrastructure for SAP S/4HANA with no upfront cost or long-term commitment
Pay for only what you need Don't spend upfront costs purchasing hardware for what you can't forecast
Test and evaluate SAP S/4HANA, on-premise edition with a free trial offering from SAP on AWS

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

Allthecooks, BetterCloud, Bluecore, Cosentry, Evite, Ezakus, HTC, Infectious Media, iStreamPlanet, Mendelics, SageMathCloud, Sedex, Treeptik, Wibigoo, Wix, zulily, Zync

Brigade Group, DoHome, Royal FloraHolland

Buyer's Guide

Google Compute Engine vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

June 2025

Free Report: Google Compute Engine vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Compute Engine vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Compute Engine vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.

See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.