Google Chronicle Suite vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform comparison

Google and Seceon are both solutions in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category. Google is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.5, while Seceon is ranked #44 with an average rating of 7.0. Google holds a 2.0% mindshare in SIEM, compared to Seceon’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Seceon users who would recommend it.

Google Chronicle Suite

Read 16 Google Chronicle Suite reviews

4,123 Views
3,793 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Read 13 Seceon Open Threat Management Platform reviews

1,343 Views
1,316 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Google Chronicle Suite

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

The Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and Google Chronicle Suite compete in the cybersecurity solutions category. Google Chronicle Suite seems to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and perceived value, despite Seceon's better support and pricing.

Features: Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers comprehensive threat detection, automated response capabilities, and proactive security management. Google Chronicle Suite provides extensive integration options, deeper data analysis features, and a more sophisticated and scalable feature set.

Room for Improvement: Seceon Open Threat Management Platform needs better documentation, more frequent updates, and enhanced user education. Google Chronicle Suite could improve its user education, onboarding processes, and documentation comprehensiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is straightforward to deploy, with responsive customer service. Google Chronicle Suite may require a more complex setup, but the detailed guidance provided is valued by users.

Pricing and ROI: Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers favorable setup costs and high return on investment, with good value for money. Google Chronicle Suite, while more expensive upfront, provides substantial long-term benefits, justifying its higher costs due to advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Google Chronicle Suite vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Google Chronicle Suite vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Google Chronicle Suite

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Seceon Open Threat Manageme...

Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

44th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Google Chronicle Suite is 2.0%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Google Chronicle Suite	2.0%
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform	0.8%
Other	97.2%

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)

Featured Reviews

Viney Bhardwaj

Director at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees

Has required significant customization but has supported threat pattern discovery and AI-driven analytics

The integration of Google Chronicle Suite with existing SIEM systems needs to be more mature, so some customization is required. With custom applications, it's quite difficult, and they need to work on this. The automated threat detection features in Google Chronicle Suite come with a lot of false positives and noise. They are new to the market and need to improve significantly. Customization is vital where users can customize the alerts, dashboard, or content as per their needs. This is more required in Google Chronicle Suite, allowing analysts or engineers to create according to the organization. They need to provide cheaper options for online versus offline log storage and improve retention and compression of the logs. Especially searching offline logs is a feature missing from most SIEM solutions nowadays.

Read full review

TamimKhan

Solution Architect at Tiger IT Bangladesh Limited

Customization options need improvement but valuable threat management features and reasonable pricing benefit service providers

We are a Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), and we provide services to our customers Seceon Open Threat Management Platform offers valuable features such as XDR and EDR. I also find the SOC and SOAR features valuable. Log management is another key functionality of the product. There are…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The UEBA capabilities provide valuable user and entity behavior analytics, and the context from Google threat intelligence significantly bolsters threat detection."

"The language used for content creation is very flexible and visually appealing."

"Google Chronicle Suite is a highly scalable solution with good search capabilities."

"The dashboards are clean and clearly written, making it easy to use and understand."

"What sets Chronicle apart from other solutions is its emphasis on threat hunting rather than solely serving as a monitoring tool."

"The main advantage I see is the cost, which is currently low."

"The tool's most valuable feature is the search option, allowing easy navigation."

"The price of Google Chronicle Suite is its number one selling point."

More Google Chronicle Suite pros

"The main thing is the value proposition. It is one of the most sophisticated yet affordable solutions that I've come across. It is also one of the easiest-to-manage yet comprehensive solutions for a SOC analyst. Its customizations are really good, and it has a lot of integrations. It is multi-tenant and very fast to onboard. Its stability is 100%. We've never had an outage with it. It doesn't require extensive hardware resources. Its level of support is also very good. They have a very responsive technical team."

"It is effective because it has threat intelligence from across the world and constantly checks and updates for new threats."

"The most valuable features are behaviour analytics, threat intelligence, endpoint detection, and response features."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform notifies only genuine alerts. It offers plenty of options that are suitable for MSPs."

"The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable."

"We only recently started using Seceon, so we aren't taking advantage of all its features yet. We have enabled some proactive alerts about utilization and bottlenecks from high traffic."

"The solution is very cost-effective compared to Splunk and LogRhythm."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its artificial intelligence."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform pros

Cons

"The dashboarding feature does not meet our expectations."

"In terms of improvement, the UI can be a bit challenging for beginners."

"It is still not mature enough. If I create some content, there might be roadblocks, although this could change in the future."

"The graphical user interface could be improved to enhance user experience."

"The configuration is not optimal."

"They are slow, and the initial responses often require more information rather than providing helpful solutions."

"The tool needs to improve tasking packages. Its GUI needs to be improved. The product needs to include time-based filtration. We can only see the alert detection timeline now."

"The tool is a little bit difficult to use compared to Microsoft Sentinel."

More Google Chronicle Suite cons

"The product should improve the triggering rate."

"It would be ideal with the processing was more manageable. Not many customers are willing to have a dedicated server with two CPUs and one TB of memory. The cost of this is huge for a smaller organization."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform sells some add-ons as part of the whole suite but not individually. If they sold them individually, they could potentially attract more business."

"It would be better if they offered global coverage."

"The SOP they provided wasn't great. They offered training over Sherp Virtualization, and the Seceon leadership visited our location to explain everything in detail, but the documentation and training could be better. It isn't as effective as it could be. There's some room for improvement there."

"The dashboard has always been an issue."

"It is a standalone solution now. They need to make it into a cloud-based subscription model. It needs more compatibility for co-managed solutions. It can also have more threats and deeper integration with Microsoft."

"For future releases, integrating incident response tools and improving communication on incident reporting could be beneficial."

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is cheaper than Microsoft Sentinel."

"Compared to other solutions, Google Chronicle Suite's pricing is fine."

"The solution's pricing is dependent on the data amount."

"We have to pay extra charges for the amount of data transfer and technical support services."

"I find Seceon OTM's pricing to be reasonable, not too high or low, just okay for the market standards. I can't disclose specific figures, we pay on a quarterly basis under a service model. I would rate it eight out of ten. As a customer, I always hope for better pricing options."

"The solution is cheap and very competitive. It offers good tuning in terms of the pricing. Other solutions like Palo Alto and IBM are more expensive."

"The price is quite reasonable."

"We used the solution's trial version for two months and later purchased it."

"It has a per-asset model instead of an ingestion-based model, which gives predictable pricing. In terms of price, it is in the middle to lower range of SIEMs that it competes against. It is the most affordable solution that we have implemented so far. It was much more affordable than anything else I've implemented."

"The pricing is very competitive. It's not expensive."

"Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is cost-effective because it's a comprehensive platform that offers high availability."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Chronicle Suite?

Google Chronicle Suite is a highly scalable solution with good search capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Chronicle Suite?

Our license is based on the size of the company with an all-you-can-eat model, considering storage capabilities per day. It's a flexible pay method.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Google Chronicle Suite?

See all answers

What do you like most about Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The algorithm used in Seceon OTM is clear and logical, categorizing events as needed. This helps us identify and respond to threats effectively.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

The pricing of Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is very reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Seceon Open Threat Management Platform?

There are areas for improvement in the customization options. Every ( /products/every-reviews ) quarter, they are developing the platform with new updates based on feedback provided.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Sentinel vs Google Chronicle Suite

Compared 16% of the time

Google Security Operations vs Google Chronicle Suite

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Google Chronicle Suite

Compared 10% of the time

Sentinel vs Google Chronicle Suite

Compared 10% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Google Chronicle Suite

Compared 7% of the time

More Google Chronicle Suite Competitors

LogRhythm SIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 10% of the time

DNIF HYPERCLOUD vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Wazuh vs Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Compared 8% of the time

More Seceon Open Threat Management Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Google Chronicle Suite

January 2026

Download Google Chronicle Suite product report

Buyer's Guide

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

January 2026

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report

Download Seceon Open Threat Management Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Seceon OTM, Seceon aiSIEM, aiSIEM, Seceon Open Threat Management

Overview

Organizations primarily leverage Google Chronicle Suite for centralized log management, threat intelligence, and endpoint security, addressing MDR requirements with continuous monitoring.

Google Chronicle Suite supports storage, security, and alert checking. Utilizing log information to generate alerts and integration with search engines, it monitors network and login issues. It is a choice for consultants on client projects, and partners handle its global resale and implementation.

What are the key features of Google Chronicle Suite?

Threat Hunting: Enables proactive searches for potential threats.
Fast Information Retrieval: Swiftly accesses necessary data.
Efficient Search: Provides easy-to-use searching capabilities.
Premade Dashboards: Ready-to-use dashboards for quick insights.
Simple Log Management: Streamlines the logging process.
Multiple Connectors: Broad connectivity support.
Flexible Data Outputs: Versatile data handling.
Top Threat Intelligence: High-quality intelligence capabilities.
Speed Handling Real-Time Cyber Threats: Rapid threat response.
Proactive Threat Identification: Detects threats before they occur.

What are the benefits and ROI of Google Chronicle Suite?

Centralization: Unified log management boosts efficiency.
Enhanced Security: Advanced threat intelligence improves protection.
Global Implementation: Available worldwide through partners.
Consultant Benefit: Useful for client-specific challenges.
Continuous Monitoring: Non-stop network and login issue tracking.

Industries employ Google Chronicle Suite for its robust security measures and log management. It is especially vital for IT, finance, healthcare, and any sector needing stringent security and compliance. Consultants find it essential for tailoring security protocols in client projects, while partners ensure seamless implementation across regions.

Google

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that offers real-time threat detection, analysis, and response capabilities. It leverages advanced AI and machine learning algorithms to provide proactive threat hunting and automated incident response.

With its intuitive dashboard, users can gain complete visibility into their network, applications, and endpoints, enabling them to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. The platform integrates seamlessly with existing security infrastructure, consolidating data from various sources for centralized monitoring and analysis.

Its threat intelligence feeds and behavioral analytics enable the identification of both known and unknown threats, ensuring comprehensive protection against advanced cyber attacks. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform empowers security teams with actionable insights, enabling them to prioritize and respond to threats swiftly. With its automated remediation capabilities, it minimizes the impact of attacks and reduces response time. The platform also offers customizable reporting and compliance management features, facilitating regulatory compliance and providing stakeholders with comprehensive security status updates.

Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a robust and scalable solution that caters to the evolving cybersecurity needs of organizations across industries.

Seceon

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Caduceus, SUNY

Buyer's Guide

Google Chronicle Suite vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

December 2025

Free Report: Google Chronicle Suite vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Google Chronicle Suite vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Google Chronicle Suite vs. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform report.

See our list of best Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) vendors.

We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.