We performed a comparison between Goliath Performance Monitor and NetCrunch based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."Offers a diversity of features."
"I like that it not only has the ability to monitor but that it can do a lot of specific Citrix monitoring."
"Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."
"I would love to be able to tell what ISP the user is coming from."
"Issues with generating reports; consistency is not there."
"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."
Goliath Performance Monitor is ranked 60th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while NetCrunch is ranked 67th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Goliath Performance Monitor is rated 7.6, while NetCrunch is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Goliath Performance Monitor writes "Monitors well with Citrix, stable, and the support is very responsive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetCrunch writes "A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better". Goliath Performance Monitor is most compared with ControlUp, Zabbix and eG Enterprise, whereas NetCrunch is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor and Fortinet FortiSIEM.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
