Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Glean Platform vs Lucidworks comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Glean Platform
Ranking in Indexing and Search
16th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Search as a Service (11th), AI-Agent Builders (10th)
Lucidworks
Ranking in Indexing and Search
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Indexing and Search category, the mindshare of Glean Platform is 1.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lucidworks is 11.6%, up from 8.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Indexing and Search Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Lucidworks11.6%
Glean Platform1.7%
Other86.7%
Indexing and Search
 

Featured Reviews

Use Glean Platform?
Share your opinion
OK
Provides the ability to control how indexing and searching perform
* Facets were one of the major features which provide powerful ways to filter search results. * A wide range of connectors allows you to utilize Fusion on different areas. * Ability to control how indexing and searching perform and controls how the scoring for search results is done, letting you customize the search experience according to your needs. * High availability
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Indexing and Search solutions are best for your needs.
870,623 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Wells Fargo, Cisco, Nike, Target, Verizon, Hortonworks
Find out what your peers are saying about Elastic, Luigi's Box, Lucidworks and others in Indexing and Search. Updated: September 2025.
870,623 professionals have used our research since 2012.