GitHub vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

GitHub and Spirent are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.9, while Spirent is ranked #35 with an average rating of 7.0. GitHub holds a 0.8% mindshare in AS, compared to Spirent’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,518 Views
1,112 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood

Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood reviews

156 Views
93 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub

Spirent CyberFlood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Spirent CyberFlood and GitHub operate in cybersecurity and software development, respectively, with overlaps in certain functions. Data shows Spirent CyberFlood is preferred for specific security testing needs, while GitHub is more suited for collaborative development workflows due to its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Spirent CyberFlood excels in traffic generation, performance analysis, and user-friendly scheduling, providing strong security testing capabilities. In contrast, GitHub offers advanced version control, robust security, and a collaborative coding environment, benefiting team productivity and project management.

Room for Improvement: Spirent CyberFlood could improve by enhancing integration with existing IT structures, offering more flexible deployment options, and expanding its feature set for broader functionality. GitHub may enhance its platform by improving integration with other DevOps tools, refining its project management capabilities, and offering more direct support options for less experienced users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying Spirent CyberFlood involves structured IT setups and offers personalized support for technical environments. GitHub benefits from cloud-based deployment models, ensuring straightforward setup and diverse support channels, making it advantageous for various teams.

Pricing and ROI: Spirent CyberFlood offers competitive pricing focused on delivering security testing benefits for organizations with rigorous requirements. GitHub's tiered pricing is justified by its comprehensive tools that enhance development efficiency, often resulting in a higher perceived ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Spirent CyberFlood

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Spirent CyberFlood

Ranking in Application Security Tools

35th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (32nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Jos Badimo

Director at BAMS

Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance

The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests."

"I appreciate saving from Visual Studio Code that implements changes directly on GitHub."

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"For branching, it works well, especially in an agile environment."

"The ease of use is valuable."

"The most valuable features are GitHub are the standard features, they are very useful."

"There are no issues. It's simple, easy, and fully compatible from my perspective with Git."

"I like the CI/CD features."

More GitHub pros

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

"CyberFlood is flexible."

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

Cons

"We want to incorporate management comments within GitHub, making it more like a product management tool. We haven't done that yet. Another change we're considering is migrating from GitHub to Azure DevOps, especially now that Microsoft has introduced it."

"There is room for improvement in terms of interface."

"One thing GitHub could do is probably the same thing as what Sourcetree does. When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict."

"I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity."

"If you are uploading or cloning a large file, with more than 25 megs, it's pretty slow."

"While using the solution when merging two code branches the code becomes a bit messy. This should be improved in the future."

"As of now, if I would like to learn about GitHub or its features, I would have to look on YouTube. It would be nice if they were able to send out a newsletter with explanations of new features that they are offering and what features are available."

"I would like to see more security where a plugin was available for us to update in relation to security."

More GitHub cons

"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."

"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"I use the free version of the tool."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Spirent CyberFlood?

CyberFlood is flexible.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 78% of the time

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 22% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

April 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

April 2025

Download Spirent CyberFlood product report

Also Known As

No data available

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Spirent

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Spirent CyberFlood

April 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. Spirent CyberFlood

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.