We performed a comparison between GitHub and Spirent CyberFlood based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."
"The most important feature of GitHub is the maintainability of the versions of the code."
"Our code is secure."
"We've found the technical support to be very helpful."
"GitHub's version control is valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the source code management. It's very helpful and it's a great product."
"GitHub provides good time reduction and this is what I value the most."
"Complication free with good ability for third-party integrations."
"CyberFlood is flexible."
"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."
"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."
"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."
"The descriptions within Github could be more user-friendly to show the trees of Gitflow."
"The solution can improve by adding video guides, official guides, or short courses that cater to beginners who are new to the system. These resources could offer step-by-step guidance on how to use GitHub, including common procedures such as pulling and committing. Currently, many of us have to resort to searching for information on how to do these tasks via Google. An official guide provided by GitHub itself would be a valuable asset to newcomers and would save them time and effort."
"The onboarding process could be simplified."
"If it had all of the end-to-end integration, then we probably wouldn't have any doubts about what we have installed. However, at this point, we're still trying to figure out how to use it end-to-end."
"GitHub could add more security features. I am not sure how secure it is. If they provide more security features, then it can be used in more official applications."
"GitHub could have better integration or capability with other solutions."
"The solution should have less integration with the AI part, but it needs to add features with other automation tools so that it can be easily integrated."
"I would like to see more security where a plugin was available for us to update in relation to security."
"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."
"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."
"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."
"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."
GitHub is ranked 13th in Application Security Tools with 64 reviews while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 33rd in Application Security Tools with 4 reviews. GitHub is rated 8.6, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "I like the solution's flexibility". GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, Atlassian SourceTree and Fortify on Demand, whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint and Ixia BreakingPoint VE. See our GitHub vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
