GitHub vs Spirent CyberFlood comparison

GitHub and Spirent are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0, while Spirent is ranked #32. GitHub holds a 0.9% mindshare in AS, compared to Spirent’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Spirent users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 94 GitHub reviews

3,586 Views
2,116 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Spirent CyberFlood

Read 5 Spirent CyberFlood reviews

681 Views
245 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub

Spirent CyberFlood

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Spirent CyberFlood and GitHub target different markets; CyberFlood focuses on network security stress testing while GitHub is centered on software development collaboration. GitHub seems to have an upper hand due to its comprehensive features and perceived value, especially in collaboration and integration.

Features: Spirent CyberFlood stands out with its advanced threat simulation, protocol support, and compliance testing capabilities, which are essential for network security validation. GitHub excels with its version control system, collaborative tools, and seamless integration capabilities. The platform also supports branching, automating tasks, and advanced security measures.

Room for Improvement: Spirent CyberFlood could enhance its user interface, increase scalability options, and provide more streamlined reporting tools. GitHub has room to improve on integration capabilities with other DevOps tools, offer enhanced offline functionalities, and refine its documentation to further assist new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Spirent CyberFlood provides a straightforward deployment process with strong support services geared towards assisting in network security testing. GitHub offers an easy-to-implement cloud-based solution that facilitates quick onboarding for development teams, backed by substantial documentation and community resources.

Pricing and ROI: Spirent CyberFlood requires a significant initial investment tailored to enterprise-scale deployments, offering strong ROI through enhanced security testing. GitHub offers flexible pricing tiers suitable for teams of varying sizes, promising ROI by boosting productivity and collaboration. Its cost-effective structure makes it accessible to a broader audience.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Spirent CyberFlood Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Spirent CyberFlood

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Spirent CyberFlood

Ranking in Application Security Tools

32nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spirent CyberFlood is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Improved deployment pipeline visibility with generally good support

My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Read full review

Jos Badimo

Director at BAMS

Test assurance improves compliance and products with good performance

The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation. The most significant issue I encounter with the solution is the user interface. It would be beneficial if I could remain on one screen most of the time. Even if the system navigates me to another screen, it should effectively return me to the main screen.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The features of GitHub are very nice and helpful for developers."

"It has a lot of features from the code development perspective. You get a lot of features such as repo, commit, merge, and branch. You can play around and do things on the fly. It is easy and simple to deploy. It is also easier to use when working from home."

"Has great integration with third-party tools."

"I recommend using GitHub because it is reliable and helpful for developers."

"I like the CI/CD features."

"Even if I'm not in the office, I can access and work on my code from anywhere with my account credentials."

"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."

"The deployment is fast since we just have to run the script, and once it's done, it takes a few minutes."

More GitHub pros

"CyberFlood is flexible."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"CyberFlood's best features are its user-friendliness and scheduling function."

"The feature I find most valuable is the traffic generator."

"The testing compliance feature is particularly impressive."

"Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer."

Cons

"It would be beneficial if GitHub provided some security scanning for new libraries to ensure that there are no viruses in it."

"GitHub uses basic configuration, but messaging is not clear."

"The ticketing system is not working."

"I would like to see integration with Slack such that all of the changes made in GitHub are reflected there."

"The solution can improve by adding video guides, official guides, or short courses that cater to beginners who are new to the system. These resources could offer step-by-step guidance on how to use GitHub, including common procedures such as pulling and committing. Currently, many of us have to resort to searching for information on how to do these tasks via Google. An official guide provided by GitHub itself would be a valuable asset to newcomers and would save them time and effort."

"It would be good if there were training materials for junior developers."

"The sign in process is a bit difficult."

"There is room for improvement in terms of interface."

More GitHub cons

"The solution needs more ports, more speed, and more gigabytes."

"The initial setup is not straightforward and can be quite challenging."

"I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule."

"The user interface could be improved to facilitate easier navigation."

"Sometimes, when you configure parameters the hardware can't run, it will get stuck at those points without telling you what happened. It would be helpful if the error reporting provided more details about why the test setting is not running. It would be nice if there were a space in the hardware module for you to add some external hardware for more rigorous testing."

"CyberFlood's accessibility and support for multiple browsers could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"CyberFlood is reasonably priced."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spirent CyberFlood?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Spirent CyberFlood?

I have been using the solution for a year now. The customers I work with are focused on both custom test assurance and test automation. The solution is utilized in the financial services sector and...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Spirent CyberFlood?

The language barrier and time difference pose significant issues with customer support. The price is competitive. The biggest benefits I find are test assurance, the reliability of the test results...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Ixia BreakingPoint vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 61% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 25% of the time

Ixia BreakingPoint VE vs Spirent CyberFlood

Compared 14% of the time

More Spirent CyberFlood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

August 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

July 2025

Download Spirent CyberFlood product report

Also Known As

No data available

CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Spirent

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Digicel

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Spirent CyberFlood

July 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. Spirent CyberFlood

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Spirent CyberFlood and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Spirent CyberFlood report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.