GitHub vs ReversingLabs comparison

GitHub and ReversingLabs are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.0, while ReversingLabs is ranked #21 with an average rating of 10.0. GitHub holds a 0.9% mindshare in AS, compared to ReversingLabs’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ReversingLabs users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 94 GitHub reviews

3,586 Views
2,116 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ReversingLabs

Read 4 ReversingLabs reviews

1,589 Views
254 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub

ReversingLabs

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

GitHub and ReversingLabs operate in the technology and cybersecurity sectors, catering to software development and threat intelligence, respectively. GitHub holds a competitive edge in software development due to its user-friendly interface and efficient collaboration tools, while ReversingLabs excels in security with its advanced threat detection capabilities.

Features: GitHub offers a robust platform for collaboration with tools like version control, GitHub Actions, and integrations with Microsoft's Azure. Its interface supports smooth navigation for development teams. ReversingLabs focuses on comprehensive threat detection with its automated static analysis, detailed malware repository, and actionable security insights, making it an essential tool for security operations.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance its security measures to compete better in security-focused environments and explore more robust project management integrations. ReversingLabs might work on improving its ease of use, documentation clarity, and streamlining integrations with non-security platforms to widen its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub features a simple deployment process with extensive support documents, making it accessible for developers of all levels, and it also benefits from strong community support. ReversingLabs requires more technical expertise for deployment, offering comprehensive vendor support to ensure effective integration into security infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides a flexible pricing scheme starting with free individual use, scaling up to enterprise services, offering a high ROI through collaboration and development efficiency. ReversingLabs charges a premium for its services, justified by its substantial contributions to security measures and threat intelligence, providing an excellent ROI for companies focused on cybersecurity.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. ReversingLabs Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. ReversingLabs

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

ReversingLabs

Ranking in Application Security Tools

21st

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (18th), Container Security (31st), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (11th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (14th), Software Supply Chain Security (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReversingLabs is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Kamalanadha Reddy

Senior DevOps Engineer at Simplify3x Software Private Limited

Improved deployment pipeline visibility with generally good support

My primary use case involves working with GitHub for code management. I have extensive experience using it for various tasks, such as creating repositories, managing pull requests, and utilizing GitHub Actions for automating workflows GitHub contributes to efficient project management by…

Read full review

Jesse Harris

Principal Solutions Architect at Tanium

Comes with a large sample size and helps t stay on top of emerging threats

The solution helps to stay on top of emerging threats with easy integration with other products. ReversingLabs has a large sample size. The solution needs to improve integrations. I have been using the solution for four to five years. ReversingLabs' stability is excellent. I rate the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is help offered by the community for open-source projects."

"I find GitHub very user friendly."

"This product is very good for storing and versioning code."

"For branching, it works well, especially in an agile environment."

"The solution is scalable."

"Has great integration with third-party tools."

"GitHub provides enough storage for uploading the source code."

"GitHub is very straightforward. I really appreciate the versioning capabilities, ease of use, and the ability to host code."

More GitHub pros

"As far as the malware repository is concerned, it's extensive. It's a good source for finding samples, where we are unable to find them on other channels or by leveraging other sources."

"As far as static analysis information is concerned, we use most of the information that is available in order to determine whether or not we might be dealing with a malware variant. This includes information that is related to Java rules. This is also related to malware families indicated or specific malicious software variants that are labeled by name."

"It offers reports on a great many more file types than the other analysis solutions we have. It can give us a more in-depth analysis and better reporting on a larger number of file types. It also gives us a more comprehensive score on a number of things as well, and that's why we're using it as a front-end filter. It gives us more information... It's valuable because of its depth of information, as well as the breadth it gives us. There aren't a lot of tools that cover all of the different file types."

"The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild."

"ReversingLabs has a large sample size."

Cons

"The descriptions within Github could be more user-friendly to show the trees of Gitflow."

"It would be useful to have tutorial videos within the GitHub dashboard."

"I decided not to use GitHub but developed my tool because I found it more efficient. I'm familiar with my tools, making them easier to use. I like being able to customize them to fit my workflow and the way I think.. Software development is like a personal workshop, and I tailor my version control to match my approach."

"When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict."

"The user interface on GitLab is better."

"We are not able to access GitHub from our VPN."

"One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools."

"The query function in GitHub is a bit stiff."

More GitHub cons

"The solution needs to improve integrations."

"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality."

"We would really like further integration with our threat intelligence platform, which is called ThreatConnect. We would also really like further integrations with an endpoint protection product we use called Tanium. The reason I mentioned both of these is that ReversingLabs claims to have extensive integrations with both of them, but they did not work for us."

"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets. Right now, I can only do them individually."

"The product support could be better at times. Sometimes, the resources that they provide could be of higher quality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"Currently, the license number of lookups that we purchased has not been reached yet, because the integration has only recently been completed. However, our usage is expected and planned to increase over the next couple of months."

"We have a yearly contract based on the number of queries and malicious programs which can be processed."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

See all answers

What do you like most about ReversingLabs?

ReversingLabs has a large sample size.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ReversingLabs?

The solution needs to improve integrations.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ReversingLabs?

I rate the product a ten out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs

Compared 23% of the time

JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs

Compared 12% of the time

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox vs ReversingLabs

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ReversingLabs

Compared 9% of the time

Black Duck vs ReversingLabs

Compared 9% of the time

More ReversingLabs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

August 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

ReversingLabs

August 2025

Download ReversingLabs product report

Also Known As

No data available

ReversingLabs Titanium, ReversingLabs secure.software

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

ReversingLabs is the trusted authority in software and file security. We provide the modern cybersecurity platform to verify and deliver safe binaries. Trusted by the Fortune 500 and leading cybersecurity vendors, the ReversingLabs Titanium Platform® powers the software supply chain and file security insights, tracking over 35 billion files daily with the ability to deconstruct full software binaries in seconds to minutes. Only ReversingLabs provides that final exam to determine whether a single file or full software binary presents a risk to your organization and your customers.

RL - Trust Delivered.

https://www.reversinglabs.com

ReversingLabs

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, oil & gas, telecommunications, information technology

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. ReversingLabs

July 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. ReversingLabs

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. ReversingLabs and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. ReversingLabs report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.