GitHub vs ReversingLabs comparison

GitHub and ReversingLabs are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.9, while ReversingLabs is ranked #24 with an average rating of 10.0. GitHub holds a 0.8% mindshare in AS, compared to ReversingLabs’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ReversingLabs users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,347 Views
1,098 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ReversingLabs

Read 4 ReversingLabs reviews

238 Views
138 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub

ReversingLabs

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

GitHub and ReversingLabs compete within software development and cybersecurity threat intelligence, respectively. GitHub has the upper hand in community engagement and tool integration, while ReversingLabs excels in security analytics.

Features: GitHub offers seamless version control, extensive integration with development tools, and robust collaboration features that cater to development teams. ReversingLabs is known for its sophisticated threat detection, large-scale file analysis, and comprehensive malware intelligence, establishing it as a leader in security.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance its DevOps integration to match the capabilities available out of the box in competitors like GitLab. It would also benefit from improving its user interface and onboarding support. Additionally, strengthening its security features could make GitHub more attractive to security-conscious teams. ReversingLabs could simplify its deployment process to facilitate easier integration for non-specialized users. It may also consider expanding its analytics beyond traditional security data and reduce the complexity of its interface to improve user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub offers an intuitive deployment model with comprehensive resources and responsive customer support, making it ideal for development-focused teams. ReversingLabs provides detailed support, though its deployment is more complex due to the product's security-centric nature, requiring specialized knowledge for effective use.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides flexible pricing with strong ROI for development teams through affordable plans that enhance productivity. On the other hand, ReversingLabs reflects its specialized security features with higher setup costs, offering significant ROI via its advanced threat detection capabilities. GitHub is more cost-effective for development requirements, while ReversingLabs offers value for entities prioritizing comprehensive security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. ReversingLabs Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. ReversingLabs

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

ReversingLabs

Ranking in Application Security Tools

24th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (18th), Container Security (26th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (12th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (11th), Software Supply Chain Security (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReversingLabs is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Jesse Harris

Principal Solutions Architect at Tanium

Comes with a large sample size and helps t stay on top of emerging threats

The solution helps to stay on top of emerging threats with easy integration with other products. ReversingLabs has a large sample size. The solution needs to improve integrations. I have been using the solution for four to five years. ReversingLabs' stability is excellent. I rate the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The features of GitHub are very nice and helpful for developers."

"The Projects Tab, which shows you the todo list and the progress for projects, is very helpful."

"The most valuable features are GitHub Actions for triggering workflows, GitHub Secrets for saving credentials without needing a third-party service, and the UI for identifying errors in the code when we commit."

"It's beneficial for managing multiple tasks and controlling versions of your product."

"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."

"You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests."

"The best feature is the ability to track the history of all code changes, and it's easy to use. Additionally, as it's open source, anyone can use that feature resulting in distributed development. This opens the door to collaboration with different code and developer, feature, and master branches of development."

"The most valuable features are the speed, low latency, and the clear, concise set of commands."

More GitHub pros

"ReversingLabs has a large sample size."

"It offers reports on a great many more file types than the other analysis solutions we have. It can give us a more in-depth analysis and better reporting on a larger number of file types. It also gives us a more comprehensive score on a number of things as well, and that's why we're using it as a front-end filter. It gives us more information... It's valuable because of its depth of information, as well as the breadth it gives us. There aren't a lot of tools that cover all of the different file types."

"As far as static analysis information is concerned, we use most of the information that is available in order to determine whether or not we might be dealing with a malware variant. This includes information that is related to Java rules. This is also related to malware families indicated or specific malicious software variants that are labeled by name."

"As far as the malware repository is concerned, it's extensive. It's a good source for finding samples, where we are unable to find them on other channels or by leveraging other sources."

"The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild."

Cons

"It would be good if there were training materials for junior developers."

"The security point should be addressed in the next release and scaling is also an issue."

"The GUI design is poor, so I exclusively use the CLI, which is much easier to use and understand. It would be great to see the GUI updated to be more user-friendly."

"It would be useful to have tutorial videos within the GitHub dashboard."

"The merging features can be improved."

"I cannot recall coming across any shortcomings of the product."

"One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools."

"The solution needs some more controls for deleting code."

More GitHub cons

"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality."

"The product support could be better at times. Sometimes, the resources that they provide could be of higher quality."

"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets. Right now, I can only do them individually."

"We would really like further integration with our threat intelligence platform, which is called ThreatConnect. We would also really like further integrations with an endpoint protection product we use called Tanium. The reason I mentioned both of these is that ReversingLabs claims to have extensive integrations with both of them, but they did not work for us."

"The solution needs to improve integrations."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"We have a yearly contract based on the number of queries and malicious programs which can be processed."

"Currently, the license number of lookups that we purchased has not been reached yet, because the integration has only recently been completed. However, our usage is expected and planned to increase over the next couple of months."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

See all answers

What do you like most about ReversingLabs?

ReversingLabs has a large sample size.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ReversingLabs?

The solution needs to improve integrations.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ReversingLabs?

I rate the product a ten out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs

Compared 24% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs ReversingLabs

Compared 13% of the time

JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs

Compared 13% of the time

Black Duck vs ReversingLabs

Compared 12% of the time

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox vs ReversingLabs

Compared 9% of the time

More ReversingLabs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

April 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

ReversingLabs

April 2025

Download ReversingLabs product report

Also Known As

No data available

ReversingLabs Titanium, ReversingLabs secure.software

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

ReversingLabs is the trusted authority in software and file security. We provide the modern cybersecurity platform to verify and deliver safe binaries. Trusted by the Fortune 500 and leading cybersecurity vendors, the ReversingLabs Titanium Platform® powers the software supply chain and file security insights, tracking over 35 billion files daily with the ability to deconstruct full software binaries in seconds to minutes. Only ReversingLabs provides that final exam to determine whether a single file or full software binary presents a risk to your organization and your customers.

RL - Trust Delivered.

https://www.reversinglabs.com

ReversingLabs

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, oil & gas, telecommunications, information technology

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. ReversingLabs

April 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. ReversingLabs

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. ReversingLabs and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. ReversingLabs report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.