GitHub vs ReversingLabs comparison

GitHub and ReversingLabs are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #4 with an average rating of 9.0, while ReversingLabs is ranked #42. GitHub holds a 1.1% mindshare in AS, compared to ReversingLabs’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ReversingLabs users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 97 GitHub reviews

3,549 Views
2,094 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ReversingLabs

Read 4 ReversingLabs reviews

2,019 Views
444 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub

ReversingLabs

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

GitHub and ReversingLabs operate in the software development and cybersecurity sectors, respectively. GitHub has an edge in development environments with its integration and collaboration features, while ReversingLabs excels in threat detection and analysis due to its specialized security tools.

Features: GitHub offers strong collaboration through its innovative source code management, easy integration with various tools, and flexibility in repository management, making it ideal for development teams. ReversingLabs provides deep insights into malware, an extensive repository for static and dynamic analysis, and robust threat intelligence.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve its user interface for navigating extensive repositories, enhance security features, and offer more built-in project management tools. ReversingLabs might benefit from simplified integration with other security tools, faster analysis speeds, and more intuitive interfaces for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is seamless to deploy, with various integrations that support different environments, and offers extensive online support. ReversingLabs provides detailed customer support and hands-on assistance, preferred by users needing expert guidance during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides competitive pricing with multiple subscription tiers that yield substantial ROI in terms of productivity and collaboration. ReversingLabs has a higher initial cost but offers significant returns through its advanced security solutions. GitHub is cost-effective for developers, while ReversingLabs's value lies in enhancing cybersecurity.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. ReversingLabs Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. ReversingLabs

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,853 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd), Agile and DevOps Services (2nd)

ReversingLabs

Ranking in Application Security Tools

42nd

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (46th), Container Security (48th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (25th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (30th), Software Supply Chain Security (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReversingLabs is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub	1.1%
ReversingLabs	0.5%
Other	98.4%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Murathan OK

Software Development Manager at a media company with 10,001+ employees

CI/CD workflows have become streamlined and AI support has improved collaborative development

We are using GitHub because it is open-source software, which is the most valuable solution for us. The open source and community support are very good. We are always up-to-date with the community, and integration difficulty is very low. If you integrate any CI/CD solutions on GitHub, it's very easy. We started using GitHub about three months ago with AI integration. For our deployments, some developers can be very shy about asking for descriptions on their commits. We are using AI support for comments and deployment management, which is beautiful. We are not using the GitHub API for automating workflows in our projects. I give GitHub a five-star rating for the review capabilities. I also give GitHub five stars for integration with third-party applications. There is a lot of integration available on GitHub. If you want to integrate something, even if it could be integrated before GitHub, you can make your code and integrate your own in-house applications. It's a very easy and powerful aspect of GitHub.

Read full review

Tim Craig

Forensic Lead, Global Security Fusion Center at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Very good malware and goodware repository and enables us to look more deeply at indicators of compromise

The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild. Also, the solution’s object and file analysis provide us with actionable insights. Its malware and goodware repository is very good. It's very robust. It gets all of the different repositories that are out there that do analysis and brings them under one roof where we can statically analyze for those indicators of compromise and look at them more deeply. If we need to go deeper into things, we can do that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The support team is good."

"We can make a private repository."

"The most valuable features of GitHub are the ease of integration into Microsoft Azure DevOps. The process that you need to deploy into Microsoft Azure becomes fairly simple and the templates are already available, a lot of the engineers find it easier to use."

"We've found the technical support to be very helpful."

"A great feature is being able to have different repositories and different kinds of projects in a single solution at a single time. It's just a click away."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"GitHub is good for collaboration because everyone can access it or we can restrict access to a few users. If I upload a file and share the URL, it's not restricted to a set number of users. Everyone with the link can download the files."

"The flexibility of this solution has been most valuable. It operates on a pay per use basis where you can ramp up or decrease usage."

More GitHub pros

"It offers reports on a great many more file types than the other analysis solutions we have. It can give us a more in-depth analysis and better reporting on a larger number of file types. It also gives us a more comprehensive score on a number of things as well, and that's why we're using it as a front-end filter. It gives us more information... It's valuable because of its depth of information, as well as the breadth it gives us. There aren't a lot of tools that cover all of the different file types."

"The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild."

"ReversingLabs has a large sample size."

"As far as static analysis information is concerned, we use most of the information that is available in order to determine whether or not we might be dealing with a malware variant. This includes information that is related to Java rules. This is also related to malware families indicated or specific malicious software variants that are labeled by name."

"As far as the malware repository is concerned, it's extensive. It's a good source for finding samples, where we are unable to find them on other channels or by leveraging other sources."

Cons

"The user interface on GitLab is better."

"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."

"I faced one or two breakdowns. That said, they lasted only for a few seconds or a minute."

"GitHub uses basic configuration, but messaging is not clear."

"When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict."

"I would like to see integration with Slack such that all of the changes made in GitHub are reflected there."

"GitHub could expand the limits of the free version."

"The project management sector really needs some improvement for GitHub. I don't know if GitHub made sense for me as a project manager."

More GitHub cons

"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality."

"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets. Right now, I can only do them individually."

"The solution needs to improve integrations."

"The product support could be better at times. Sometimes, the resources that they provide could be of higher quality."

"We would really like further integration with our threat intelligence platform, which is called ThreatConnect. We would also really like further integrations with an endpoint protection product we use called Tanium. The reason I mentioned both of these is that ReversingLabs claims to have extensive integrations with both of them, but they did not work for us."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"Currently, the license number of lookups that we purchased has not been reached yet, because the integration has only recently been completed. However, our usage is expected and planned to increase over the next couple of months."

"We have a yearly contract based on the number of queries and malicious programs which can be processed."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Insurance Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	49

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I was paying approximately one hundred dollars annually about a year ago. I am uncertain of the current cost, but GitHub without Copilot is free as far as I know. I am not paying anything for my Gi...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Security could make GitHub better. OWASP Top Ten security advisors could be integrated on GitHub, and it could provide checks and advice. That would be much better. Additionally, LLM integration on...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs

Compared 16% of the time

JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs

Compared 11% of the time

MetaDefender vs ReversingLabs

Compared 8% of the time

OPSWAT Filescan Sandbox vs ReversingLabs

Compared 7% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs ReversingLabs

Compared 7% of the time

More ReversingLabs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

December 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

ReversingLabs

December 2025

Download ReversingLabs product report

Also Known As

No data available

ReversingLabs Titanium, ReversingLabs secure.software

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

ReversingLabs is the trusted authority in software and file security. We provide the modern cybersecurity platform to verify and deliver safe binaries. Trusted by the Fortune 500 and leading cybersecurity vendors, the ReversingLabs Titanium Platform® powers the software supply chain and file security insights, tracking over 35 billion files daily with the ability to deconstruct full software binaries in seconds to minutes. Only ReversingLabs provides that final exam to determine whether a single file or full software binary presents a risk to your organization and your customers.

RL - Trust Delivered.

https://www.reversinglabs.com

ReversingLabs

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, oil & gas, telecommunications, information technology

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. ReversingLabs

December 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. ReversingLabs

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. ReversingLabs and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,853 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. ReversingLabs report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.