We performed a comparison between GitGuardian Public Monitoring and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."One thing I really like about it is the fact that we can add search words or specific payloads inside the tool, and GitGuardian will look into GitHub and alert us if any of these words is found in a repository... With this capability in the tool, we have good surveillance over our potential blind spots."
"The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for."
"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is one of the best user-friendly solutions for getting the proxy set up."
"The Repeater and the BApp extensions are particularly useful. Certain extensions, such as the Active Scan extensions and the Autoracer extension, are very good."
"The automated scan is what I find most useful because a lot of customers will need it. Not every domain will be looking for complete security, they just need a stamp on the security key. For these kinds of customers, the scan works really well."
"The Spider is the most useful feature. It helps to analyze the entire web application, and it finds all the passes and offers an automated identification of security issues."
"This tool is more accurate than the other solutions that we use, and reports fewer false positives."
"The most valuable feature of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is the advanced features, user-friendly interface, and integration with other tools."
"The suite testing models are very good. It's very secure."
"The initial setup is simple."
"I would like to see improvement in some of the user interface features... When one secret is leaked in multiple files or multiple repositories, it will appear on the dashboard. But when you click on that secret, all the occurrences will appear on the page. It would be better to have one secret per occurrence, directly, so that we don't have to click to get to the list of all the occurrences."
"I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems like a compelling approach to lure and identify attackers."
"The Auto Scanning features should be updated more frequently and should include the latest attack vectors."
"The scanner and crawler need to be improved."
"The technical support team's response time is mostly delayed and should be improved."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The biggest drawback is reporting. It's not so good. I can download them, but they're not so informative."
"It should provide a better way to integrate with Jenkins so that DAST (dynamic application security testing) can be automated."
"If your application uses multi-factor authentication, registration management cannot be automated."
"One area that can be improved, when compared to alternative tools, is that they could provide different reporting options and in different formats like PDF or something like that."
More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
GitGuardian Public Monitoring is ranked 27th in Application Security Tools with 2 reviews while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is ranked 9th in Application Security Tools with 55 reviews. GitGuardian Public Monitoring is rated 9.0, while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of GitGuardian Public Monitoring writes "Helps us prioritize remediation tasks efficiently, improves our overall security visibility, and is effective in detecting and alerting us to security leaks quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional writes "The solution is versatile and easy to deploy, but it needs to give more detailed security reports". GitGuardian Public Monitoring is most compared with Snyk, whereas PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is most compared with OWASP Zap, Fortify WebInspect, Acunetix, HCL AppScan and Qualys Web Application Scanning.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.