GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between GitGuardian Public Monitoring and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for.""One thing I really like about it is the fact that we can add search words or specific payloads inside the tool, and GitGuardian will look into GitHub and alert us if any of these words is found in a repository... With this capability in the tool, we have good surveillance over our potential blind spots."

More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Pros →

"The logs play a crucial role as they contribute to blocking unwanted Internet traffic.""It integrates well with other solutions and provides good threat intelligence in terms of external threats.""The feature that I like best is the dashboard.""I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.""The most valuable feature is alerting."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pros →

Cons
"I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems like a compelling approach to lure and identify attackers.""I would like to see improvement in some of the user interface features... When one secret is leaked in multiple files or multiple repositories, it will appear on the dashboard. But when you click on that secret, all the occurrences will appear on the page. It would be better to have one secret per occurrence, directly, so that we don't have to click to get to the list of all the occurrences."

More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Cons →

"It would be helpful to have better documentation for configuring and installing the solution.""I would like to have more technical documentation that contains greater detail on the types of threats that are occurring.""It is a completely cloud-based product at present.""I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate.""It would be better if they used the threat intelligence feeds directly from their side and changing the verdict instead of us requesting it."

More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for."
  • More GitGuardian Public Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is expensive."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced."
  • More Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Threat Intelligence Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The Explore function is valuable for finding specific things I'm looking for.
    Top Answer:It's a bit expensive, but it works well. You get what you pay for. You get something that is fully managed with a lot of features, and a tool that is very efficient.
    Top Answer:I'm excited about the possibility of Public Postman scanning being integrated with GitGuardian in the future. Additionally, I'm interested in exploring the potential use of honeytokens, which seems… more »
    Top Answer:I am impressed with the tool's integration of Palo Alto products which serves as a platform for security.
    Top Answer:I would like the tool to see more integration with Cortex XDR. There is no real reason to keep them separate.
    Top Answer:The tool along with other suite of products provides us with threat and alert information.
    Ranking
    Views
    82
    Comparisons
    33
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,292
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    1,164
    Comparisons
    388
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    354
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring allows real-time GitHub scanning and alerting to uncover sensitive company information hiding in online repositories. It monitors both organization repositories and developers' personal repositories. The solution gives visibility to developers and security teams on this very critical blindspot that are the organization developers' personal repositories on GitHub (80% of leaked corporate secrets on public GitHub come from developers’ personal repositories).

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring is particularly interesting for companies with large development teams (above 200 developers) and modern development practices.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring cover 350+ API providers, database connection strings, private keys, certificates, usernames and passwords and intellectual property. It uses sophisticated pattern matching techniques to detect credentials that cannot be strictly defined with a distinctive pattern (like unprefixed credentials). The algorithm has a high precision (91% “true positive” feedback following our alerts, as reported by our users.)

    The alerting is done in real-time (a few seconds after the secret was publicly exposed) which allows fast remediation involving in a collaborative way developers, security teams and operations.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring also allows red teams and pentesters to proactively look for sensitive information by performing complex queries on 12 billion documents and metadata from more than 3 years of GitHub history.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring scans public GitHub activity in real-time, helping organizations detect sensitive information leaks in source code repositories. Our solution gives Threat Intelligence and Security teams full visibility over their organization’s public GitHub Attack Surface, by monitoring both organization-owned repositories and developers' personal repositories.

    With 80% of secrets and credentials leaks on public GitHub finding their source in developers' personal repositories, GitGuardian for Public Monitoring helps organizations address a critical security blind spot.

    With real-time incident notification, Threat Intelligence and Security teams are guaranteed to reach the incident scene before everyone else and take action to mitigate the threat of breaches and intrusions.

    AutoFocus contextual threat intelligence service accelerates analysis, correlation and prevention workflows. Unique, targeted attacks are automatically prioritized with full context, allowing security teams to respond to critical attacks faster, without additional IT security resources.

    Sample Customers
    Align Technology, Automox, Fred Hutch, Instacart, Maven Wave, Mirantis, SafetyCulture, Snowflake, Talend
    Telkom Indonesia
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitGuardian Public Monitoring is ranked 17th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 2 reviews while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is ranked 10th in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 5 reviews. GitGuardian Public Monitoring is rated 9.0, while Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of GitGuardian Public Monitoring writes "Helps us prioritize remediation tasks efficiently, improves our overall security visibility, and is effective in detecting and alerting us to security leaks quickly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus writes "Impressive performance and monitoring capabilities but lacks in documentation". GitGuardian Public Monitoring is most compared with Snyk, whereas Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is most compared with ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), Anomali ThreatStream, VirusTotal, LogRhythm SIEM and Cisco Threat Grid. See our GitGuardian Public Monitoring vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus report.

    See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.