Frontegg vs Venafi comparison

Frontegg and CyberArk are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. Frontegg is ranked #30, while CyberArk is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3. Frontegg holds a 0.4% mindshare in AS, compared to CyberArk’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Frontegg users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of CyberArk users who would recommend it.

Frontegg

Read 6 Frontegg reviews

207 Views
138 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Venafi

Read 8 Venafi reviews

782 Views
361 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Frontegg

Venafi

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 11, 2024

Venafi and Frontegg are both notable contenders in their respective domains. Despite Venafi's robust security features, Frontegg edges ahead for its comprehensive toolkit and streamlined user experience.

What features are offered by Venafi in comparison to Frontegg?

Venafi is praised for its encryption, key management, and security measures. Frontegg is valued for its broad range of integrative capabilities, user authentication, and flexibility. Users view Frontegg's versatility as more beneficial compared to Venafi's focused security features.

What areas of improvement can be found in Venafi in comparison to Frontegg?

Venafi users suggest improvements in its user documentation, support responsiveness, and interface usability. Frontegg users point out the need for more customization options, better performance metrics, and enhanced reporting features. User support needs enhancement for both products in different aspects.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Venafi in comparison to Frontegg?

Venafi's deployment is considered thorough but complex. Frontegg is preferred for its simpler, faster deployment process. Customer service requires improvement for both products, with Frontegg users experiencing slightly better support responses.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Venafi in comparison to Frontegg?

Venafi's setup costs are deemed high, though justified by its security ROI. Frontegg's competitive pricing and effective ROI make it appealing despite higher upfront costs. Users believe Frontegg's value proposition outweighs Venafi's.

To learn more, read our detailed Frontegg vs. Venafi Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Venafi

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Frontegg

Ranking in Authentication Systems

30th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Single Sign-On (SSO) (18th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (9th)

Venafi

Ranking in Authentication Systems

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of Frontegg is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Venafi is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

reviewer1645395

Developer at Kovrr

Intuitive with reCaptcha integration and helpful technical support

Frontegg's solution fits us very well, as it removes the extra work of developing, maintaining, storing, and securing all of the user-management platforms. It saves us a lot of time and money every single day. Frontegg allows our organization to focus on what matters - creating meaningful, innovative solutions for our customers without wasting time and energy on problems that were already solved by the industry many, many times before. Without Frontegg, our dev velocity would have been compromised greatly, since we would have to invest in a lot of resources to maintain a properly secured, granular, and flexible user-management framework.

Read full review

Adam Goldstein

Systems Engineer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

Automates certificate management across platforms and has enhanced integration support

Venafi's automation capabilities were significant, as they allowed us to automate certificate rotation and deployment effectively. We integrated it with GlobalSign and aimed to automate DNS verification, although challenges remained. Venafi's platform-agnostic nature was beneficial for handling certificates across different systems like IIS, AWS, and Azure. It ensures centralized certificate management, which is crucial for compliance and maintaining best practices. It significantly improved our operational efficiency by automating certificate workflows. This reduced the number of certificates requiring manual management, freeing internal resources from deploying trivial certificates. While some complex certificates still needed manual intervention, automating simpler ones eliminated internal bottlenecks associated with tasks like uploading certificates to Imperva. By automating these processes, we reduced errors, streamlined workflows, and eliminated the need to repeatedly remember and execute complex procedures, ultimately increasing our overall operational efficiency. The automation capabilities are good; when properly configured, it performs as expected.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has Audit Log and many cool features that if we were to develop them by ourselves, it would require a lot of research and development resources. Frontegg gives us everything we need to ensure that our customers have a safe and reliable authentication system in which they can also manage some of the features and roles by themself which gives them more control over their environment."

"The MFA policy via Frontegg allows us to enable/disable/enforce the Multi-Factor Authentication policy of our users and to enhance security and adhere to modern standards."

"The admin portal layer is super useful and saves valuable front-end development time."

"Their developers were always willing to meet even though we are in very different time zones."

"Every feature is multi-tenant by design, making different customer requests effortless to provide."

"We like the SSO, permissions and roles, multiple workspaces, and react login components."

"Venafi's automation capabilities were significant, as they allowed us to automate certificate rotation and deployment effectively."

"It's definitely worth the money to have Venafi as a tool; it's definitely miles away from the competition, in my opinion."

"Venafi is super stable, and we experienced no issues with its stability."

"What I appreciate most about Venafi is that it is very easy to use, easy to implement, and easy to navigate, which simplifies the certification-creation process."

"We use Venafi for PKI certificates."

"We have reduced 80% to 90% of our outages with Venafi, which impacts the revenue substantially."

"What I appreciate most about Venafi is that it is very easy to use, easy to implement, and easy to navigate, which simplifies the certification-creation process."

"The feature that I have found most valuable is their certificate discovery."

More Venafi pros

Cons

"The web interface is missing a way to delete a workspace. I have accidentally created a workspace and was not able to delete it. It's a minor thing that should be supported."

"Frontegg is fairly stable, however, we are looking forward to some promised capabilities, such as more tightly integrated Feature Flag support."

"We're hoping to see more user management-related features, according to Frontegg's roadmap."

"It would be nice to have a backup export with all tenant/users so that in case of a mistake we can have the option to restore the users."

"We really like the ability to add the same user across tenants. From a UX perspective, the flow can be betterized."

"The PHP SDK is limited. It's not a huge deal as we can just use their web API directly, but it is something to note if you're using PHP.‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎ ‎‏‏‎"

"Venafi excels in automating certificate rotation and deployment but could enhance its offering by improving support for hardware security modules like Fortanix and providing more advanced, out-of-the-box integrations with public certificate authorities for DNS re-verification."

"The product was really good when it was a Venafi product. However, since its acquisition by CyberArk, there has been a lack of significant innovations. They are pushing for cloud adoption, but we prefer on-premises solutions due to regulatory concerns."

"The product was really good when it was a Venafi product. However, since its acquisition by CyberArk, there has been a lack of significant innovations."

"Venafi's overall installation could be made easier."

"There's definitely lots of room for improvement with Venafi. They have a website where we can suggest new features, and they need to take that a little bit more seriously."

"There are quite a few different technical aspects of Venafi that I feel they just missed out on; I'd have to look at my notes for the specifics."

"Currently, specific processes require manual installations due to the lack of built-in integrations."

"I would like to see included in the next release of Venafi integration with the cloud HSM's, Hardware Security Module. Additionally, I would say other cloud services, because it's not only cloud that's essential. If you have a customer that has a lot of their IT moved into cloud, integration with different cloud services is always an area to improve."

More Venafi cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing model is complex, considering factors beyond the number of certificates. This complexity can make our payments to Venafi challenging if costs continue to rise. It is good but more expensive than the competitors."

"The pricing of Venafi is really good, and that was a key reason we chose it. The pricing is very competitive compared to other solutions."

"Venafi's pricing appears to be competitive within the market."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Educational Organization

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Venafi?

We use Venafi for PKI certificates.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Venafi?

The pricing has increased for us, impacting our organization due to its operational expenditure (OPEX). The pricing model is complex, considering factors beyond the number of certificates. This com...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Venafi?

The product was really good when it was a Venafi product. However, since its acquisition by CyberArk, there has been a lack of significant innovations. They are pushing for cloud adoption, but we p...

See all answers

Comparisons

Auth0 vs Frontegg

Compared 64% of the time

WorkOS vs Frontegg

Compared 14% of the time

Descope vs Frontegg

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Frontegg

Compared 10% of the time

More Frontegg Competitors

AppViewX CERT+ vs Venafi

Compared 41% of the time

DigiCert PKI Platform vs Venafi

Compared 32% of the time

Entrust Identity Enterprise vs Venafi

Compared 15% of the time

Axiad Conductor vs Venafi

Compared 12% of the time

More Venafi Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

April 2025

Download Frontegg product report

Buyer's Guide

Venafi

April 2025

Download Venafi product report

Overview

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Frontegg

Venafi automates protection for machine identities, which all organizations rely on to keep communications between machines secure and private. Venafi generates the machine identity intelligence necessary to automatically safeguard the flow of information to trusted machines and prevent communication with untrusted ones - all at machine speed and scale.

CyberArk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Surescripts, CME Group, TD Bank Group, Aetna, MoneyGram, Zions Bancorp, Cisco

Buyer's Guide

Frontegg vs. Venafi

April 2025

Free Report: Frontegg vs. Venafi

Find out what your peers are saying about Frontegg vs. Venafi and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Frontegg vs. Venafi report.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.