Fortra Tripwire IP360 vs Veracode comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fortra Logo
433 views|322 comparisons
60% willing to recommend
Veracode Logo
25,659 views|17,134 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortra Tripwire IP360 and Veracode based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's become the pinnacle point for anything that enters the network or anything that's passing through to production to first be affected by IP360, hardened, and up to standard. For our integrity management, one was deployed in the bank about two years ago and that's still going to expand the usage and the product itself. That will go hand in hand with training and expanding the product as for where it's deployed.""We could manage our entire IP range with the solution.""Tripwire IP360 is a very stable solution."

More Fortra Tripwire IP360 Pros →

"Veracode is a valuable tool in our secure SDLC process.""The capability to identify vulnerable code is the most valuable feature of Veracode.""This is a great tool for learning about potential vulnerabilities in code.""The solution's ability to prevent vulnerable code from going into production is perfectly fine. It delivers, at least for the reports that we have been checking on Java and JavaScript. It has reported things that were helpful.""The user interface is quick, familiar, and user-friendly and makes navigation to other software very easy.""One thing we like is the secret detection feature. It has helped us to discover keys stored in our settings file as a TXT document. We can address that vulnerability by using encryption. We can even scan Docker images for vulnerabilities. Static analysis is another good feature of Veracode because we can run a security scan during development to identify the vulnerabilities.""The recommendations and frequent updates are the most valuable features of Veracode.""Code scanning is the most valuable feature."

More Veracode Pros →

Cons
"We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running.""I am not very impressed by the technical support.""The reporting functions can use improvement. There is room for growth because reporting functions differ a lot depending on what you're going to output. It depends on whether it's for technical or senior management and how it's interpreted. There could be growth within the reporting functionality side."

More Fortra Tripwire IP360 Cons →

"The documentation is poor and the technical support isn't helpful.""It can take time to find options if you don’t use the interface a lot. At some point, a bit of interface restyling may help.""Veracode's ease of use could be improved. I would also like to see more online videos and tutorials that could help us understand the product better. It would also be helpful if Veracode created a certification program for DevSecOps staff to learn about their product and get certified. This kind of training would raise the company's profile within the industry.""The dynamic scanning feature works, but it doesn't work properly for some of our applications. It doesn't allow us to skip. They claim that we can do this, but it doesn't work when we're scanning the applications in real-time.""Veracode should provide more flexibility in its pricing and licensing modules so that it could be more affordable for all types of projects and not only for very active mission-critical projects.""Static scanning takes a long time, so you need to patiently wait for the scan to achieve. I also think the software could be more accurate. It isn't 100 percent, so you shouldn't completely rely on Veracode. You need to manually verify its findings.""Their scanning engine is sometimes a little bit slow. They can improve the scan time.""The scanning could be a little faster. The process around three or four minutes, but it would help if it could be further reduced."

More Veracode Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I believe the price compares well within the market."
  • "The product was expensive for us."
  • More Fortra Tripwire IP360 Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Its complexity makes it quite expensive, but it’s all worth it, with all the engineering in the background."
  • "The pricing is pretty high."
  • "The worst part about the product is that it does not scale at all. Also, microservices apps will cost you a fortune."
  • "I think licensing needs to be changed or updated so that it works with adjustments. Pricing is expensive compared to the amount of scanning we perform."
  • "It's worth the value"
  • "Pricing seems fair for what is offered, and licensing has been no problem. All developers are able to get the access they need."
  • "It can be expensive to do this, so I would just make sure that you're getting the proper number of licenses. Do your analysis. Make sure you know exactly what it is you need, going in."
  • "The licensing and prices were upfront and clear. They stand behind everything that is said during the commercial phase and during the onboarding phase. Even the most irrelevant "that can be done" was delivered, no matter how important the request was."
  • More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We could manage our entire IP range with the solution.
    Top Answer:The product was expensive for us. It was not cost-effective for how we used it to do the job. We didn't think it was worth the money.
    Top Answer:It's an enterprise-level tool. If we’re not putting it in everything, it's very expensive to maintain in terms of people and time. We need to dedicate time and resources to keep it running. It was… more »
    Top Answer:SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use… more »
    Top Answer:The SAST and DAST modules are great.
    Top Answer:The product’s price is a bit higher compared to other solutions. However, the tool provides good vulnerability and database features. It is worth the money.
    Ranking
    39th
    Views
    433
    Comparisons
    322
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    592
    Rating
    6.0
    Views
    25,659
    Comparisons
    17,134
    Reviews
    101
    Average Words per Review
    976
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IP360
    Crashtest Security , Veracode Detect
    Learn More
    Overview

    Tripwire IP360 is a powerful vulnerability management solution that identifies and prioritizes network vulnerabilities for remediation. It is highly effective in scanning devices and applications, improving security posture, ensuring compliance, and managing risks. 

    Users value its detailed reporting, user-friendly interface, and seamless integration with other security tools for efficient security management.

    Veracode is a leading application security platform that helps organizations to develop and deliver secure software. Veracode's solution provides comprehensive capabilities for static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, and manual penetration testing.

    Veracode's static analysis solution scans source code for various security vulnerabilities, including common web application attack vectors, injection flaws, cross-site scripting, and insecure direct object references. Veracode's dynamic analysis solution simulates real-world attacks to identify vulnerabilities that may not be detectable by static analysis alone. Veracode's software composition analysis solution scans open-source and third-party components for known vulnerabilities. Veracode's manual penetration testing service is performed by experienced security professionals who use a variety of techniques to identify vulnerabilities in software applications.

    Many organizations, including Fortune 500 companies, government agencies, and startups, use Veracode's solution. Veracode's customers rely on Veracode to help them to improve the security of their software applications and to reduce the risk of data breaches and other security incidents.

    Here are some of the benefits of using Veracode:

    • Veracode provides capabilities for static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, and manual penetration testing to help organizations identify and fix security vulnerabilities in their software applications early in the development process.
    • Veracode helps organizations reduce the risk of data breaches and other security incidents by identifying and fixing security vulnerabilities in their software application. 
    • Veracode helps organizations to comply with industry regulations. Many industries have regulations that require organizations to implement security measures to protect their customers' data. Veracode's solution can help organizations to comply with these regulations by providing them with the tools and resources they need to identify and fix security vulnerabilities in their software applications.
    Sample Customers
    1. Aetna 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. AIG 5. Airbus 6. Akamai 7. Amazon 8. American Express 9. Aon 10. Apple 11. ATT 12. Autodesk 13. Bank of America 14. Barclays 15. Bayer 16. Bechtel 17. BlackRock 18. Boeing 19. BNP Paribas 20. Cisco 21. CocaCola 22. Comcast 23. Dell 24. Deutsche Bank 25. eBay 26. ExxonMobil 27. FedEx 28. Ford 29. General Electric 30. Google 31. HP 32. IBM
    Manhattan Associates, Azalea Health, Sabre, QAD, Floor & Decor, Prophecy International, SchoolCNXT, Keap, Rekner, Cox Automotive, Automation Anywhere, State of Missouri and others.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Government9%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Insurance Company9%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise49%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Vulnerability Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: April 2024.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortra Tripwire IP360 is ranked 39th in Vulnerability Management with 6 reviews while Veracode is ranked 2nd in Application Security Tools with 194 reviews. Fortra Tripwire IP360 is rated 7.0, while Veracode is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fortra Tripwire IP360 writes "The solution helps users to manage their entire IP range, but it's unreliable and very expensive to maintain". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veracode writes "Helps to reduce false positives and prevent vulnerable code from entering production, but does not support incremental scanning ". Fortra Tripwire IP360 is most compared with Tenable Nessus, whereas Veracode is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx One, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and OWASP Zap.

    We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.