We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox CORE comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fortinet FortiNAC Logo
9,662 views|6,293 comparisons
Portnox CORE Logo
2,646 views|1,636 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiNAC vs. Portnox CORE and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
563,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Fortinet FortiNAC is both scalable and stable.""Provides containment and security and and carries out file analysis for cyber theft.""Compliance checks are a good feature. Compliance check is for windows updates and for antivirus updates, etc.""The most valuable features of the solution are the user-friendliness, the graphical interface, and the technical support. The interface is very nice and the customization is good.""The most valuable features are the ease of deployment and ease of use.""This solution is very easy to implement and use. The interface is user-friendly.""The most valuable features are usability and security."

More Fortinet FortiNAC Pros →

"There is an add-on feature for application control to kill unwanted applications when launched on a user's device.""Technical support was very helpful when we needed them.""It's so easy to set up, you don't need outside assistance.""For the information security team, the security level was improved because it helped to manage and prevent rogue devices from connecting to the corporate network. The reporting was granular, and reports we scheduled for delivery on Portnox were useful during investigations and audits, especially in cases where the IP address changed."

More Portnox CORE Pros →

Cons
"Admin UI could be better matched and easier to use; it cannot work as a RADIUS server.""The GUI is a little bit strange — different than other Fortinet products.""For our organization and our clients, the price is the main concern. They should work to make it more competitive.""The response and resolution time for technical support issues need to be improved.""The reporting capability needs to be improved.""This solution could be more agile.""The implementation process needs improvement. Right now, it's somewhat complicated. They could create some templates to facilitate implementation. Right now everything is done manually, and it just takes a really long time at the initial setup."

More Fortinet FortiNAC Cons →

"Now, the way security is viewed, maybe including something like AI, to automate some of the things that are required to be done would be great.""The solution did have some stability issues, however, all I had to do was restart it.""Portnox CORE can improve on support for unmanaged switches (or hubs) and other brands of network devices. These kinds of devices are still in use in organisations, especially SMEs who cannot afford to buy a managed switch."

More Portnox CORE Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing fees are a little bit high."
  • "The pricing is similar to that of other solutions."
  • More Fortinet FortiNAC Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The vendor price is fair."
  • "The licensing module should be reviewed to count the number of devices instead of port numbers of total switches. There is a case for this where not all ports for a switch are used by devices. Unused ports are calculated in the license, then the customer pays for license for those unused ports."
  • More Portnox CORE Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.
    563,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    Cisco ISE uses AI endpoint analytics to identify new devices based on their behavior. It will also notify you if someone plugs in with a device that is not allowed and will block it. The user… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Hi, The NAC can operate without the 802.1x mechanism on the switch side. Also, I think you are making a very wrong comparison on the basis of the class it belongs to(FortiNac vs FortiAuthenticator).… more »
    Top Answer: 
    My preference would be HPE/Aruba's Clearpass product over either of these 2 products, although Clearpass really shines when using the Wireless Guest and OnBoarding functions.  The authentication… more »
    Top Answer: 
    Technical support was very helpful when we needed them.
    Top Answer: 
    We have just some list prices, just so we can evaluate the product. That said, from what I have seen, the prices are okay. They're not cheap and they're not very expensive. They are okay in terms of… more »
    Top Answer: 
    It would be ideal if the configuration aspect of the product was easier. It's possible that the documentation could be better and could help with simplifying configuration steps. The solution did have… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    9,662
    Comparisons
    6,293
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    473
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    2,646
    Comparisons
    1,636
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    671
    Rating
    9.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    FortiNAC, Bradford Networks, Bradford Networks Sentry, Network Sentry Family
    Access Layers portnox
    Learn More
    Overview

    The proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, has made it necessary for organizations to improve their visibility into what is attached to their networks. They need to know every device and every user accessing their networks. IoT devices enable digital transformation initiatives and improve efficiency, flexibility, and optimization. However, they are inherently untrustworthy, with designs that prioritize low-cost over security. FortiNAC provides the network visibility to see everything connected to the network, as well as the ability to control those devices and users, including dynamic, automated responses.

    Portnox CORE provides 100% actionable visibility and control of all devices that are connected to the enterprise network. As a software-based Network Access Management (NAM) platform, Portnox CORE’s patented solution allows for efficient management of the security and compliance challenges that organizations face in a smart and simple way.

    Offer
    Learn more about Fortinet FortiNAC
    Learn more about Portnox CORE
    Sample Customers
    Isavia, Pepperdine University, Medical University of South Carolina, Columbia University Medical Center, Utah Valley University
    EL AL Israeli Airlines, Channel 10 News, Wales Millennium Centre, The College of Management Academic Studies
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Government14%
    Educational Organization14%
    University14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider27%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Government6%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider33%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Government5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise53%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise57%
    Large Enterprise14%
    Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiNAC vs. Portnox CORE and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    563,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 7 reviews while Portnox CORE is ranked 6th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 3 reviews. Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 8.4, while Portnox CORE is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "Enhances the Security Fabric with visibility, control, and automated response for everything that connects to the network & protection against IoT threats extending control to third-party devices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Portnox CORE writes "Great dashboards, easy to set up, and very scalable". Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiClient and macmon Network Access Control, whereas Portnox CORE is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Forescout Platform, Aruba ClearPass, Portnox Clear and Sophos Network Access Control. See our Fortinet FortiNAC vs. Portnox CORE report.

    See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

    We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.