OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Rapid7 AppSpider comparison

The compared OpenText and Rapid7 solutions aren't in the same category. OpenText is ranked #3 in DAST , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 22.2% mindshare in the category. Rapid7 is ranked #32 in SAST , and holds a 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Read 21 OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews

744 Views
308 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

Rapid7 AppSpider

Read 14 Rapid7 AppSpider reviews

846 Views
127 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Rapid7 AppSpider

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and Rapid7 AppSpider based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. Rapid7 AppSpider Report (Updated: May 2022).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

May 2022

Download the complete report

Helped 860,711 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (3rd), DevSecOps (10th)

Rapid7 AppSpider

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (32nd)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is designed for Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and holds a mindshare of 22.2%, down 30.5% compared to last year.
Rapid7 AppSpider, on the other hand, focuses on Static Application Security Testing (SAST), holds 0.5% mindshare, down 0.5% since last year.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

Navin N

Global ISO 27001 Program Lead at DXC Technology

Effective scanning of diverse file extensions with fast reporting and issue resolution

We develop software packages for clients, and these clients are mostly in the BFSI sector. The packages need to be scanned, and we engage Fortify WebInspect for this. Customers typically perform their own application pen tests, but in some cases, we have engagements where customers want us to scan…

Read full review

Rizwan-Alam

Head Information Security at Akhtar Fuiou Technologies

Easy automated web app scanning, but gives many false positives and isn't always stable

One of the challenges I have with AppSpider is that it gives you a lot of false positives, especially when compared to other solutions. This is the main aspect that I hope to see Rapid7 improve on. Beyond reducing false positives, I would also like to see them implement better reporting features, particularly in the executive summary type of reports which need to be user-friendly and easily understood by non-technical people. The recommendations and solutions on these reports could always be improved to make them more relevant, too. Lastly, the stability isn't that great, and sometimes it becomes non-responsive. I feel like the stability of the application is very average and currently needs more work.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Reporting, centralized dashboard, and bird's eye view of all vulnerabilities are the most valuable features."

"The tool provides comprehensive vulnerability assessments which help ensure our deliverables are as free from vulnerabilities as possible. It has also streamlined our web application vulnerability assessments, assisting us in delivering secure applications to our clients."

"The solution's technical support was very helpful."

"The solution is easy to use."

"The transaction recorder within WebInspect is easy to use, which is valuable for our team."

"The accuracy of its scans is great."

"Good at scanning and finding vulnerabilities."

"I've found the centralized dashboard the most valuable. For the management, it helps a lot to have abilities at the central level."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros

"Rapid7 AppSpider is good at managing different applications. It uses applets and generates reports to cover the PCA/GDPR compliance requirements."

"When it is set up properly, it can do scanning on web apps with multiple engines automatically."

"What I like most about AppSpider is that it's easy to use and its automated scan gives me all the details I need to know when it comes to vulnerabilities and their solutions."

"AppSpider's most valuable feature is reporting - everything is stored in the local database so it can be sent to other machines."

"The solution is highly stable, rated at ten out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 AppSpider is the vulnerability reporting data. Additionally, the data is reported in a convenient way rather than seeing them as a PDF. We are able to generate all the reports exactly what we want in a flexible way."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which is compliant with international standards."

"It scans all the components developed within a web application."

More Rapid7 AppSpider pros

Cons

"A localized version, for example, in Korean would be a big improvement to this solution."

"The initial setup was complex."

"Fortify WebInspect's shortcoming stems from the fact that it is a very expensive product in Korea, which makes it difficult for its potential customers to introduce the product in their IT environment."

"The solution needs better integration with Microsoft's Azure Cloud or an extension of Azure DevOps. In fact, it should better integrate with any cloud provider. Right now, it's quite difficult to integrate with that solution, from the cloud perspective."

"It took us between eight and ten hours to scan an entire site, which is somewhat slow and something that I think can be improved."

"Creating reports is very slow and it is something that should be improved."

"The scanner could be better."

"The main area for improvement in Fortify WebInspect is the price, as it is too high compared to the market rate."

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons

"Integration could be better."

"The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users."

"The dashboard and interface are crucial and they need some improvement."

"The solution is too slow. It could take a full day to scan. Competitors are much faster."

"The performance of the solution could improve. When I compare the speed it is slower than others on the market. There are some tricks we use to help speed up the solution."

"The product needs to be able to scale for large companies, like ours. We have millions of IP addresses that need to be scanned, and the scalability is not great."

"There are some glitches with stability, and it is an area for improvement."

"AppSpider has some problems with the RAM needed while scanning."

More Rapid7 AppSpider cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."

"It’s a fair price for the solution."

"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."

"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."

"The price is okay."

"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."

"This solution is very expensive."

"The price of Rapid7 AppSpider cost 9,000 annually but there is limited usage. Large companies are able to negotiate a better price or a better deal for the usage with the vendor."

"The price is pretty fair."

"It is expensive if you want to buy the Enterprise version that is able to scan multiple applications at once."

"The licensing cost depends on the number of users."

"AppSpider is closed-source software and you need to acquire a license in order to use it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Fortify WebInspect?

The solution's technical support was very helpful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?

The price of Fortify WebInspect is high, with the cost depending on the number of virtual users. It is approximately 25% higher than other solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?

The main area for improvement in Fortify WebInspect is the price, as it is too high compared to the market rate. The cost of the license depends on the number of virtual users and, in comparison to...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 AppSpider?

The price is not high, but for Japanese customers, localization may incur additional costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 AppSpider?

For Japanese customers, localization is needed. The product should offer a GUI in Japanese and provide Japanese reports for end-users.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 AppSpider?

Our clients use AppSpider to address security concerns for their websites. It is particularly used by customers who require security assessments.

See all answers

Comparisons

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 19% of the time

OWASP Zap vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 12% of the time

Acunetix vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

Compared 8% of the time

More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors

Rapid7 InsightAppSec vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 42% of the time

Acunetix vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 11% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 7% of the time

Invicti vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 7% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Rapid7 AppSpider

Compared 7% of the time

More Rapid7 AppSpider Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing

June 2025

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing report

Download OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 AppSpider

June 2025

Download Rapid7 AppSpider product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect

AppSpider

Overview

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?

Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.

What benefits should users expect from reviews?

Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText

SPAs, APIs, mobile—the evolution of application technology is measured in months, not years. Is your web application security testing tool designed to keep up? AppSpider lets you collect all the information needed to test all the apps so that you aren’t left with gaping application risks.

Our dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution crawls to the deepest, darkest corners of even the most modern and complex apps to effectively test for risk and get you the insight you need to remediate faster. With AppSpider on your side (or, rather, all of your sides), you’ll be able to scan all the apps today and always be ready for whatever comes next.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Aaron's

Microsoft

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

May 2022

Free Report: OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. Rapid7 AppSpider

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. Rapid7 AppSpider and other solutions. Updated: May 2022.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs. Rapid7 AppSpider report.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.