Forcepoint ZTNA vs GoodAccess comparison

Forcepoint and GoodAccess are both solutions in the ZTNA category. Forcepoint is ranked #19, while GoodAccess is ranked #15 with an average rating of 9.5. Forcepoint holds a 1.5% mindshare in Z, compared to GoodAccess’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Forcepoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of GoodAccess users who would recommend it.

Forcepoint ZTNA

Read 1 Forcepoint ZTNA review

345 Views
304 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GoodAccess

Read 21 GoodAccess reviews

731 Views
336 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Forcepoint ZTNA

GoodAccess

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Forcepoint ZTNA and GoodAccess based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies, Cloudflare and others in ZTNA.

To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,789 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Forcepoint ZTNA

Ranking in ZTNA

19th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GoodAccess

Ranking in ZTNA

15th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (22nd), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the ZTNA category, the mindshare of Forcepoint ZTNA is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GoodAccess is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

ZTNA Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
GoodAccess	1.5%
Forcepoint ZTNA	1.5%
Other	97.0%

ZTNA

Featured Reviews

AbhijeethReetoo

Business Development Management at a computer retailer with 501-1,000 employees

You can add multiple features on a single agent, but it's an expensive product, and its marketing approach should be more aggressive

Forcepoint ZTNA isn't well-known in the market. Right now, it's a novice, so an area for improvement in it is making the product known. Forcepoint should create more awareness about Forcepoint ZTNA because a distributor like me still needs to promote it more to customers. Forcepoint has to capitalize on, focus on, or highlight its overall approaches to Forcepoint ZTNA marketing, such as SASE or SSE, to sell the whole bundle rather than as a standalone product. Today, most customers move to the cloud, so the whole SSE or SASE approach makes better sense. Forcepoint needs to look at the whole picture. I suggest being more aggressive in marketing to boost customer awareness of Forcepoint ZTNA.

Read full review

Gytenis Borusas

Director, Information Technology at Veriheal

Limits outside access and secures internal systems through straightforward setup

The best features GoodAccess offers are that it is very simple to use for users and very simple to set up for administrators.When I say it is simple to set up, I mean it has a simple interface with not many options to explore, and it is very straightforward.GoodAccess has positively impacted my organization as we have fewer IPs to whitelist and limited access for anybody outside of our organization into our internal systems.This has definitely increased security, but I do not have a measurable number to indicate how much it improved in percentage or absolute terms.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like about Forcepoint ZTNA is that you could use it as a starting point because you have one agent that allows you to add more features. Other technologies require one agent per solution, so you'll end up with multiple agents."

"The VPN's role in facilitating remote work has improved internal efficiency."

"No extra hardware is needed, and it is very easy to set up"

"The solution has easy-to-use administration and offers an easy implementation."

"The solution's robustness has meant that our team, regardless of where they're located, feels as though they're working right from the office, having secure and quick access to all essential tools."

"GoodAccess offers a very available professional support service - it can be via chat service, email, or phone."

"Access control allows us to manage permissions efficiently, ensuring secure and tailored access."

"It has become an integral part of our remote work toolkit, as it enables us to overcome USA IP restrictions, ensuring our global teams can collaborate effectively."

"We love the simple interface and speed and reliability of the system."

More GoodAccess pros

Cons

"Forcepoint ZTNA isn't well-known in the market. Right now, it's a novice, so an area for improvement in it is making the product known. Forcepoint should create more awareness about Forcepoint ZTNA because a distributor like me still needs to promote it more to customers."

"The installable app's occasional bugs have caused disruptions for some users, impacting smooth usage."

"The interface could provide more extensive information regarding the occurrence of threats. Currently, it only displays rudimentary threat data."

"GoodAccess can be improved by providing more editable options on the admin side. I would like to see more options and more granular controls for users who know what they are doing as an administrator."

"For small organizations, it works great. However, the larger the organization, the more scalable the pricing model, the better, since gateways can be very expensive if an organization needs multiple gateways."

"Adding one user at a time to the package as compared to blocks of five would be helpful. Currently, we end up with empty seats on our plans."

"Their recent revision in pricing was a jolt. Though any business understands the need for periodic pricing evaluations, a clearer communication strategy and more gradual changes might have been more palatable for long-term clients like us."

"The product could improve by extending its chat support beyond 8-5 CET, Monday to Friday, to a 24/7 service for better accessibility and immediate assistance."

"Enhancing the user interface and experience could make it more intuitive for all users."

More GoodAccess cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Ninety percent of the feedback I received from company partners is that Forcepoint ZTNA is an expensive product."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ZTNA solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GoodAccess?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is straightforward; my colleague handled it, but the pricing is competitive and straightforward.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GoodAccess?

GoodAccess can be improved by providing more editable options on the admin side.I would like to see more options and more granular controls for users who know what they are doing as an administrator.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GoodAccess?

My main use case for GoodAccess is to limit outside IPs, so we whitelist only one IP.I use GoodAccess for all our internal employees to connect to our internal systems, and they can do so only thro...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiGate vs Forcepoint ZTNA

Compared 68% of the time

Ivanti Neurons for ZTA vs Forcepoint ZTNA

Compared 32% of the time

More Forcepoint ZTNA Competitors

Cloudflare One vs GoodAccess

Compared 26% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs GoodAccess

Compared 25% of the time

Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs GoodAccess

Compared 10% of the time

Citrix Secure Private Access vs GoodAccess

Compared 10% of the time

Skyhigh Security vs GoodAccess

Compared 9% of the time

More GoodAccess Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA

February 2026

Download Forcepoint ZTNA product report

Buyer's Guide

GoodAccess

March 2026

Download GoodAccess product report

Overview

Implement Zero Trust policies easily, verifying remote workers and giving them access to only the private apps they need – not all apps in internal data centers and private clouds. Protect internal apps against potentially compromised remote devices and data theft.

Forcepoint

GoodAccess is a cybersecurity platform enabling medium-sized enterprises to implement Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) effortlessly, offering protection for remote and hybrid workforces.

GoodAccess empowers enterprises by providing a low-code, hardware-free SASE/SSE platform. It simplifies deploying zero trust architectures quickly, integrating with both modern SaaS applications and legacy systems. This makes it an ideal choice for businesses with 50-5,000 employees, particularly those adopting multi-cloud and SaaS environments. GoodAccess safeguards infrastructures by unifying them under a stringent zero-trust model, utilizing advanced technologies to address major cybersecurity challenges.

What are the key features of GoodAccess?

Remote access and BYOD—Simplifies device security enforcement with detailed device inventory and posture checks.
Multi-factor authentication (MFA)—Offers a unified solution for securing access to all critical systems including legacy applications.
Identity-based access control (IAM/FwaaS)—Implements zero-trust principles allowing for identity-driven access management using SSO and SCIM protocols.
Network encryption and segmentation—Provides maximum granularity in segmentation, significantly reducing the potential attack surface.
Full control and visibility—Enhances oversight with security logs and integrated SIEM, ensuring company-wide insight.

What benefits do reviews highlight about GoodAccess?

Ease of setup and use—Users can deploy efficiently without needing extensive technical expertise.
Seamless SaaS integration—Maintains high accessibility while supporting complex environments.
Cost efficiency—Promotes resource savings by offering a low-code approach with fast deployment.
Strong support services—Offers responsive assistance, aiding in smooth operations.
Consistent reliability—Ensures steady performance, bolstered by strong network integration.

GoodAccess finds application in industries focusing on remote work, particularly those needing secure point-to-point network connections. It serves technical teams seeking to optimize cloud operations, enhance network management, and ensure compliance. The platform is valuable for organizations aiming to support a hybrid workforce and achieve robust endpoint protection.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies, Cloudflare and others in ZTNA. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best ZTNA vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.