Fivetran vs Toad Data Point comparison

Fivetran and Quest Software are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while Quest Software is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.8. Fivetran holds a 1.9% mindshare in DI, compared to Quest Software’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 29 Fivetran reviews

4,822 Views
3,038 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Toad Data Point

Read 8 Toad Data Point reviews

1,484 Views
1,024 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

Toad Data Point

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Toad Data Point and Fivetran are in the data management category. Toad Data Point has an advantage in data analysis due to its powerful tools, while Fivetran leads in data integration with its automation capabilities.

Features: Toad Data Point offers advanced data analytics, SQL optimization, and powerful data visualization tools. It focuses on enhancing data analysis. Fivetran provides automated ETL processes, minimal manual effort data integration, and streamlined data ingestion, prioritizing automated data integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Toad Data Point is easy to set up with strong customer support, accessible for all users. Fivetran requires more initial configuration but offers efficient support during deployment, focusing on integration efficiency.

Pricing and ROI: Toad Data Point has competitive pricing with scalable options, offering significant ROI through comprehensive data capabilities. Fivetran, with a higher initial cost, justifies the investment by reducing manual integration efforts, providing substantial long-term ROI. Toad Data Point is cost-effective in the short term, while Fivetran offers savings on resource allocation over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. Toad Data Point Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Toad Data Point

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Data Integration

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Replication (3rd), Cloud Data Integration (8th)

Toad Data Point

Ranking in Data Integration

21st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Preparation Tools (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 1.9%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Toad Data Point is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fivetran	1.9%
Toad Data Point	0.8%
Other	97.3%

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Hafiz Usman

Team Lead Data Engineer at Data Pilot

Has accelerated data integration workflows and supports seamless development of custom connectors

I've worked extensively with Fivetran, mainly used for extraction purposes, and I've worked with the transformation element in it as well. Fivetran not only has built-in connectors but also provides SDK connectors, allowing us to develop our own connectors in an easy manner. I don't have to write raw Python scripts or dumping scripts; it offers straightforward examples and guidelines, making it much simpler to develop custom connectors inside Fivetran. We've been able to develop many custom connectors as well, which is unique and beneficial for having everything centralized instead of having those connectors located elsewhere. One of the best features by Fivetran is its clean, simple, and intuitive UI. It includes a transformation section where I can deploy my DBT queries and scripts. It also supplies good tracking capabilities for billing estimates and user permissions, allowing for customization to the desired level. The number of connectors it has remains a standout feature, and within connectors, the options available are very helpful. Although it sometimes appears static due to its built-in nature, it offers good flexibility for data transformation and caching, which I appreciate because it saves us extensive script-writing time.

Read full review

Sudunagunta Bhavya Lekha

Junior Data Analyst at Lumendata

Drag-and-drop workflows have accelerated cross-database analysis and simplified daily reporting

I consider user interface modernization in Toad Data Point to be an area for improvement; it could be enhanced with a more modern, web-based look and smoother navigation, focusing on better UX and dashboard customization. Real-time collaboration could benefit from trying Git-style integration, which would strengthen team collaboration features. Performance with large data sets sometimes slows down our workflows, so implementing a better optimization engine specifically for big data workflows could enhance functionality, along with improvements in cloud-native deployment for better browser access. For the dashboarding feature, I believe Toad Data Point could improve by offering more interactive dashboards and advanced visualizations beyond the current basic charts and pivots. Implementing capabilities such as drill-down, interactive filters, and dynamic parameter selections would align more with BI-style interactivity. Visualizations compared to tools such as Microsoft Power BI or Tableau are quite limited, so enhancing this area with cloud-hosted interactive dashboards and seamless auto-refresh options would greatly improve user experience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is not like a traditional ETL, but it gives quite a lot of flexibility."

"You can manage all of your connectors individually, which gives you a very good ability to trace which one of your ETL processes is running and when."

"The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it."

"SysTrack load is the best feature."

"The general data ingestion is valuable; it's used for a lot of data and provides about 90% of the data we use in our data warehouse without needing data engineering."

"The simplicity of the solution is its valuable feature."

"The product has some seamless connectors, which are readily available."

More Fivetran pros

"It provides better SQL development tooling than SQL Developer, which is not a sufficient tool for all development use cases. It offers power developers the tools they need."

"With Toad Data Point, I can automate most steps automatically."

"We love it."

"I would estimate that Toad Data Point saves me about 30 to 70 percent of my time depending on the work type."

"The Connectivity and Connection Manager supports a broad number of connection types, and it is trivial for end-users to set up their own connections to sources."

"Toad Data Point plays a crucial role in data-driven decision-making processes by facilitating data access and retrieval operations, data analysis, validations, quality checks, and performance monitoring for scenarios such as slow running queries, high database loads, or system bottlenecks, which are valuable for troubleshooting and debugging."

"What I like the most about Toad Data Point is the automation feature, which is mostly useful for us, and I have not found it in any other systems that I have worked with so far, and it can easily schedule any automation tasks that we provide."

"The best thing about it is its automation features."

More Toad Data Point pros

Cons

"Fivetran would be improved by adding the ability to integrate the data from third-party APIs."

"I would like Fivetran to implement additional resource monitoring and restriction policies."

"We experience cost issues because Fivetran is charged on a usage basis. When you reach a certain level, the tool should focus on reducing the costs. The solution is expensive when you are moving gigabytes and petabytes of data. It should also focus more on REST APIs and webhooks."

"There was a random change to our contract in a unilateral manner after the first year. The overall cost of using Fivetran was then unclear and this is the reason I would not recommend this solution."

"HVR Software's technical support could be improved. Whenever we log a case, the response that we get from the support is a bit delayed."

"It should have a few more monitoring functionalities."

"An in-line data quality checking capability is missing"

"Fivetran could improve in the area of customization, especially in how they socialize their tools."

More Fivetran cons

"Toad Data could improve by having additional features, such as query prediction. This could help someone who's not the strongest programmer. If the software could help them write queries correctly it would be very helpful, especially for small development teams or teams that lack the input skills necessary to write and program efficiently."

"However, when accessing large data volumes and running complex queries like nested queries or stored procedures, Toad Data Point might get hung during those operations, which is the only significant challenge I encounter."

"I used their report writing a little bit, however, it could improve since it's not a really good report writer and it's a little clunky."

"Toad Data could improve by having additional features, such as query prediction."

"It's not user-friendly. Once you start using it, you eventually get to know the features."

"Visualizations compared to tools such as Microsoft Power BI or Tableau are quite limited, so enhancing this area with cloud-hosted interactive dashboards and seamless auto-refresh options would greatly improve user experience."

"On the scheduling server, some scheduled reports just sit there and never execute for the first time. After manually executing the first time, they run with no issues."

"The Mac license is incredibly expensive. It is 1,600 dollars each, which is more than the Windows version."

More Toad Data Point cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

"In the first year, we were given a very good discount. It was approximately 20,000 Euros per year. In the third year, we purchased credit for two years and the price was 33,000 Euros per year."

"I rate the pricing a six out of ten."

"I don't have the exact information, but I know it is high, and it is on a yearly basis. There is no additional cost for what we're doing. We're always open to doing things cheaper, so we might potentially implement a different solution."

"The solution is affordable."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"The cost of this product is reasonable."

"The Mac licenses are expensive, costing 1,600 dollars each. This is much higher than for the Windows version. I maintain a very limited number of licenses due to this cost."

"The price of Toad Data Point was approximately $500 annually."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

22%

Healthcare Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Toad Data Point?

The pricing for Toad Data Point is where it gets into trouble. Microsoft is free, so if you get SQL Server, you get all the other stuff with it. You have to use several Microsoft tools that don't a...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Toad Data Point?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Toad Data Point?

We are working for US banking, and for that, we have a project where we are using PowerCenter along with ETL; in that, we are using Toad Data Point for the SQL queries. Drag-and-drop functionality ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SSIS vs Fivetran

Compared 6% of the time

Denodo vs Fivetran

Compared 5% of the time

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

SAS Enterprise Guide vs Toad Data Point

Compared 10% of the time

WhereScape RED vs Toad Data Point

Compared 9% of the time

SAS Access vs Toad Data Point

Compared 9% of the time

SSIS vs Toad Data Point

Compared 8% of the time

Teradata vs Toad Data Point

Compared 8% of the time

More Toad Data Point Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

March 2026

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

Toad Data Point

March 2026

Download Toad Data Point product report

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

Toad Data Point is a cross-platform, self-service, data-integration tool that simplifies data access, preparation and provisioning. It provides nearly limitless data connectivity, desktop data integration, visual query building and workflow automation.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

Concordia University

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. Toad Data Point

March 2026

Free Report: Fivetran vs. Toad Data Point

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. Toad Data Point and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. Toad Data Point report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.