Fivetran vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration comparison

Fivetran and IBM are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Fivetran is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.5. Fivetran holds a 5.5% mindshare in CDI, compared to IBM’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Fivetran users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Fivetran

Read 28 Fivetran reviews

3,915 Views
1,370 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Read 5 IBM Cloud Pak for Integration reviews

1,159 Views
533 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fivetran

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Fivetran and IBM Cloud Pak for Integration compete in the data integration space. Fivetran stands out for its simplicity and ease of setup, while IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is favored for its comprehensive feature set, making it more suitable for complex environments.

Features: Fivetran offers automated data connectors, seamless ETL processes, and an intuitive user interface, making data integration easy and rapid. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration includes advanced API management, messaging, and event streaming, which cater to complex enterprise requirements. Fivetran focuses on streamlined data consolidation, whereas IBM provides extensive integration capabilities for broader infrastructure needs.

Room for Improvement: Fivetran could enhance its data filtering capabilities, offer more flexibility in deployment options, and improve integration with certain platforms. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration could benefit from simplifying its deployment process, improving initial setup times, and providing clearer pricing structures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fivetran provides a cloud-based deployment known for quick setup and minimal maintenance with efficient customer service. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration offers flexible deployment options, including on-premise, cloud, or hybrid systems, catering to various enterprise needs but potentially involving longer setup processes. The difference lies in Fivetran’s straightforward deployment versus IBM’s adaptable and intricate options.

Pricing and ROI: Fivetran features a transparent pricing model with lower initial costs, offering quick ROI through swift deployment and reduced operational overhead. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration involves higher setup costs but emphasizes long-term ROI by supporting complex infrastructure integration capabilities. The primary difference is Fivetran’s cost-efficiency for simpler setups versus IBM’s investment value in extensive integration solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Fivetran vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fivetran

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (12th), Data Replication (3rd)

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

16th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

API Management (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Fivetran is 5.5%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Cloud Pak for Integration is 1.8%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Fivetran	5.5%
IBM Cloud Pak for Integration	1.8%
Other	92.7%

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Vigneswar Jeyaraj

Manager at InfoCepts

Real-time data replication and integration streamline processes and enhance productivity

The most valuable feature of Fivetran so far is the data replication. The real-time data replication is what I see best in the market where it reduces the overhead of customers needing to maintain the pipeline. Even when an error occurs, it automatically tries to solve the issue without manual interaction needed. The effectiveness of Fivetran's pre-built connectors in enhancing my customer's productivity is significant because everything is easily configurable. The documentation is very clear, so there's no difficulty in finding the necessary steps. Everything is pre-documented. The pre-built connectors that are available are excellent. Most functionalities are covered, and in most cases, it works according to expectations.

Read full review

Neelima Golla

Senior Software Engineer at NessPRO Italy

A hybrid integration platform that applies the functionality of closed-loop AI automation

I recommend using it because, in today's context, the cloud plays a significant role. Within the same user interface, you can develop applications and manage multiple applications, making it a more user-friendly option. Moreover, you can explore various other technologies while deploying on the cloud, broadening your knowledge of cloud technologies. In my case, the transition led to my learning of Kubernetes, enabling multi-scaling and expanding my technical skills. It was a valuable experience, and I had the opportunity to learn many new things during the migration process. I can easily rate it an eight or nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The compare feature is the most valuable piece of it."

"It is easy for users to get accustomed to the tool due to its gentle learning curve and clear error transparency."

"Fivetran can perform data migration incredibly fast, depending on the source and target."

"Fivetran's most valuable feature is replication."

"The product has some seamless connectors, which are readily available."

"Fivetran offers native connectivity with Sybase"

"The portal is very intuitive and easy to use."

"The simplicity and scalability are the strongest features of Fivetran."

More Fivetran pros

"Redirection is a key feature. It helps in managing multiple microservices by centralizing control and access."

"Cloud Pak for Integration is definitely scalable. That is the most important criteria."

"The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of our policies and everything is managed through JCP. It's still among the positive aspects, and it's a valuable feature."

"It is a stable solution."

"The most valuable aspect of the Cloud Pak, in general, is the flexibility that you have to use the product."

Cons

"The environment must be more development-friendly."

"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."

"I would like to see an improvement in the support offered by Fivetran."

"The documentation is decent, but it's hard to find information online about Fivetran. For example, if you try to search for an error code, you won't find much information about it in forums."

"We experience cost issues because Fivetran is charged on a usage basis. When you reach a certain level, the tool should focus on reducing the costs. The solution is expensive when you are moving gigabytes and petabytes of data. It should also focus more on REST APIs and webhooks."

"I would like for them to incorporate additional transformations. A valuable aspect of the product is that it does inflight transformations and that could be expanded."

"It should have a few more monitoring functionalities."

"The biggest area for improvement is in customization, particularly in how Fivetran socializes its tools."

More Fivetran cons

"Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent."

"Setting up Cloud Pak for Integration is relatively complex. It's not as easy because it has not yet been fully integrated. You still have some products that are still not containerized, so you still have to run them on a dedicated VM."

"Its queuing and messaging features need improvement."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"The pricing can be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I can't give exact amounts because that's based on usage, but it's more expensive than some of its competitors."

"The solution is affordable."

"The licensing costs are extremely high for the usage of somebody who has one GB or two GB of usage per day for real-time traffic. There are many other players in the market which are similarly priced or competitively priced. On average per month, it used to come around 12,000-15,000 USD, which is very high."

"Fivetran is very expensive, and its database-driven pricing model is outdated."

"The product is reasonably expensive"

"I would say they're a little bit on the expensive side, and their contract process is not particularly good, but there is a lot of potential flexibility."

"When you have a lot of workflows and complex use cases, pricing goes down as you use it more."

"The pricing model is okay and mid to large companies will not have an issue with it."

More Fivetran pricing and cost advice

"It is an expensive solution."

"The solution's pricing model is very flexible."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

11%

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the deal with the HVR software acquisition?

As a user of HVR Software I followed this deal closely. Fivetran is apparently trying to establish more in its sector and by buying an already established data replication software, they become som...

See all answers

Does HVR Software provide reliable insights?

I honestly can't think of another data replication software that can give you better statistics and insight than HVR Software. There's the feature for topology and statistics and both of them can ...

See all answers

How much traffic can HVR Software handle?

As someone who works at a company where a high volume of information is replicated and has tried several data replication softwares, I can tell you that you're looking at the right one. HVR Softwar...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

The most preferable aspect would be the elimination of the command, which was a significant improvement. In the past, it was a challenge, but now we can proceed smoothly with the implementation of ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

Enterprise bots are needed to balance products like Kafka and Confluent.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Cloud Pak for Integration?

It manages APIs and integrates microservices at the enterprise level. It offers a range of capabilities for handling APIs, microservices, and various integration needs. The platform supports thousa...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Database Migration Service vs Fivetran

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Fivetran

Compared 12% of the time

Qlik Replicate vs Fivetran

Compared 8% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Fivetran

Compared 6% of the time

Confluent vs Fivetran

Compared 4% of the time

More Fivetran Competitors

IBM App Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 39% of the time

IBM API Connect vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 13% of the time

MuleSoft API Manager vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 11% of the time

webMethods.io vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 10% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM Cloud Pak for Integration Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran

October 2025

Download Fivetran product report

Buyer's Guide

API Management

October 2025

Download IBM Cloud Pak for Integration product report

Overview

Fivetran, the global leader in data movement, is trusted by companies like OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon and Spotify to centralize data from SaaS applications, databases, files, and other sources into cloud destinations, including data lakes. With high-performance pipelines, seamless interoperability, and enterprise-grade security, Fivetran empowers organizations to modernize their data infrastructure, power analytics and AI, ensure compliance, and achieve transformative business outcomes. Learn more at Fivetran.com

Fivetran

IBM Cloud Pak for Integration gives you complete, flexible integration using capabilities you need to move at today's speed of business, including the tools to help you achieve your application modernization goals as part of your journey to the cloud.

IBM

Sample Customers

Autodesk, Condé Nast, JetBlue, Morgan Stanley, OpenAI, LVMH, Pfizer, Verizon, SpotifyNational Australia Bank, Saks, Cemex, Okta, Dropbox, Pitney Bowes, World Fuel Services,Lufthansa, AutoZone, ASICS, ASOS, Coupa, Databricks, Hermes, New Relic, Intercom,Canva, Honeywell, Square, DocuSign, Nandos, Oldcastle Infrastructure

CVS Health Corporation

Buyer's Guide

Fivetran vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

September 2025

Free Report: Fivetran vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration

Find out what your peers are saying about Fivetran vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fivetran vs. IBM Cloud Pak for Integration report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.