Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

FireHydrant vs Unit 42 Managed Detection and Response comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

FireHydrant
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
IT Alerting and Incident Management (18th)
Unit 42 Managed Detection a...
Average Rating
0.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP) (61st), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (42nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

FireHydrant and Unit 42 Managed Detection and Response aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. FireHydrant is designed for IT Alerting and Incident Management and holds a mindshare of 1.3%, up 0.4% compared to last year.
Unit 42 Managed Detection and Response, on the other hand, focuses on Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP), holds 1.4% mindshare.
IT Alerting and Incident Management
Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP)
 

Featured Reviews

Use FireHydrant?
Share your opinion
MohammedSirajuddin - PeerSpot reviewer
Flexible and reduces IT operations but requires local data sovereignty and competitive pricing
I prefer having local data sovereignty. It would be advantageous for Palo Alto to have local data centers across different countries to adhere to this requirement. I also have a concern regarding pricing, which is perceived as high compared to competitors. Improvements should focus on response times and reducing the time taken to reach solutions.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Alerting and Incident Management solutions are best for your needs.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Unit 42 Managed Detection and Response?
I find the pricing to be expensive, especially when compared with competitors who offer significant discounts. Palo Alto has room to become more competitive in its pricing.
What needs improvement with Unit 42 Managed Detection and Response?
I prefer having local data sovereignty. It would be advantageous for Palo Alto to have local data centers across different countries to adhere to this requirement. I also have a concern regarding p...
What is your primary use case for Unit 42 Managed Detection and Response?
Unit 42 is a Managed Detection and Response solution with MDR capabilities. I use it in a managed service context where my organization's security needs are catered to by Palo Alto. Generally, it i...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

* **Airbnb** * **Amazon** * **Apple** * **Atlassian** * **Baidu** * **Capital One** * **Cisco** * **Dropbox** * **Facebook** * **Google** * **HubSpot** * **IBM** * **LinkedIn** * **Lyft** * **Microsoft** * **Netflix** * **Oracle** * **PayPal** * **Pinterest** * **Qualcomm** * **Robinhood** * **Salesforce** * **Snapchat** * **Spotify** * **Square** * **Stripe** * **Twitter** * **Uber** * **VMware** * **WeWork** * **Yelp**
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about PagerDuty, Atlassian, Splunk and others in IT Alerting and Incident Management. Updated: May 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.