Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Figma vs MURAL comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Figma
Ranking in Visual Collaboration Platforms
1st
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
MURAL
Ranking in Visual Collaboration Platforms
6th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Visual Collaboration Platforms category, the mindshare of Figma is 41.1%, down from 41.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MURAL is 3.1%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Visual Collaboration Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Figma41.1%
MURAL3.1%
Other55.8%
Visual Collaboration Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Ponnila Michael Rayappan - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Developer at University of Bristol
Has supported project lifecycles with design-first workflows and streamlined developer collaboration
The area of Figma I would prefer to see improved is the responsiveness of the developer tool. When you enable it, you can extract variations, but these variations are not responsive. If I design a page, and there's a way to choose a view, whether it is on mobile or tablet, which then automatically converts it to the responsive layout of the page I design, that would save considerable time. If I design for tablet view, and it automatically adjusts for mobile and different screen variations at the click of some drop-downs, that would be beneficial. Additionally, when we extract code, if it can provide variations for all different types in a responsive way using REM to adjust to different screen sizes and breakpoints, that would be extremely useful to have.
Use MURAL?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Visual Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise4
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which would you choose - Miro or Figma?
Windows Server integrates well with all Microsoft and many other mainstream solutions. Building a Failover Cluster is comparatively much easier in Windows Server than with other solutions. We reall...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Figma?
Regarding the pricing aspect, I do not know much about the pricing, setup costs, or licensing costs. It has been a year since I joined, and everywhere I have worked, Figma was already integrated. I...
What needs improvement with Figma?
There are a few things Figma needs to improve upon, particularly regarding the types of images it can import. Currently, we cannot directly import formats like EPS from Illustrator; we must convert...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Uber, Zoom, Deliveroo
Intuit, Automattic, Ideo, Atlassian, Steelcase, Autodesk
Find out what your peers are saying about Figma, Miro, Lucid Software and others in Visual Collaboration Platforms. Updated: November 2025.
879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.