Figma vs Lucidspark comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Figma and Lucid Software are both solutions in the Visual Collaboration Platforms category. Figma is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8, while Lucid Software is ranked #4. Figma holds a 33.7% mindshare in VCP, compared to Lucid Software’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Figma users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Lucid Software users who would recommend it.

Figma

Read 16 Figma reviews

5,884 Views
5,825 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Lucidspark

Read 33 Lucidspark reviews

1,785 Views
1,785 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Figma

Lucidspark

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Figma and Lucidspark based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Visual Collaboration Platforms solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Figma vs. Lucidspark Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Figma vs. Lucidspark

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,148 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Figma

Ranking in Visual Collaboration Platforms

1st

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Lucidspark

Ranking in Visual Collaboration Platforms

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Visual Collaboration Platforms category, the mindshare of Figma is 33.7%, down from 41.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lucidspark is 3.6%, down from 6.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Visual Collaboration Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Figma	33.7%
Lucidspark	3.6%
Other	62.699999999999996%

Visual Collaboration Platforms

Featured Reviews

Vasanth Muralidharan

Freelance Webflow Designer And Developer at Freelance

Collaborating on web designs has become seamless and now delivers faster client approvals

Figma's pricing could be improved since many people are seeking open-source options like Penpot. On the free plan, I cannot have separate files for different collaborators, requiring a team plan which costs around twenty-two dollars, creating a bottleneck along with the added burden of additional features and paywalls for new AI tools being introduced. The issue of privacy arises on the free tier with collaborator access, allowing inspection of confidential files.

Read full review

reviewer1471212

Executive Assistant with self employed

Made my operations simpler, clearer, and easier to do. Learning curve for advance features needs to be more intuitive.

There are some things which are kind of complicated to know how to use. I would have to get used to them a bit more, or learn how to use them more, because I feel like there are a lot of features and I don't really know about all of them. I would need more tutorials, and that's one of the biggest things. It's so nice when you're able to just hop onto a program and intuitively know how to use it. Also, it is so tedious to have to teach new team members how to use the program, especially if they don't collaborate consistently but are hopping on for one meeting. The easier that they could make it for people to learn, like improving the learning curve, the better that Lucidspark could be. What drew me to Lucidspark was that I hopped on and it was easy and intuitive. It was very nice to look at and use. That caught me. However, there are advanced features that I would have to learn how to use, and if I want my other team members to use them, then I would have to be able to quickly and easily explain them. So, if they could make pop-up tutorials for new team collaborators, e.g., click here to do this and that as a very brief intro tutorial, then that would be helpful. I don't know if they have that already, but that would be helpful for collaborators. There are still some things that are a little confusing or too advanced, which is why it's not easy to use and hop on. There could be some other features that could be added, like other templates. What I really liked was how there were templates that gave you examples of how you could use Lucidspark. I feel like that is helpful for people to see. Adding more variety would be helpful for people. The easier it is to use, the faster someone can just pick it up and start using it. I feel like that will improve the platform and get more people to join it. A lot of small organizations need these sorts of tools, but they don't have time to spend learning about what is good about this solution and how it can help them. I would recommend making it as easy as possible, especially for small organizations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Having everything hosted on the web is one of the best features."

"Overall, Figma is a complete solution for product and UI design if you want to learn all its features for wireframing, making visual elements, using colors, and leveraging the many plugins it offers."

"I decided to switch to Figma because it is quick and seamless for my web design use cases."

"At the end of the day, I feel that I do not really have to leave the tool to do all this creative work, because I can get from the idea to a working prototype on Figma without thinking about any other tool."

"The way you can create templates is probably most helpful because it gives us a way to very quickly play around and test ideas and different types of layouts."

"From a technical perspective, Figma has greater capabilities, and once you start to explore all these features and how to connect Figma with other tools such as Storybook and Zeplin for documentation, it's a tightly coupled system with many different functionalities available which make it excellent, and I will definitely recommend Figma over other designing tools for organizations because the support it provides is extensive and highly technically feasible, making your job considerably easier."

"Figma has positively impacted my organization because it allows everyone to have access to the files that our design team produces."

"File sharing is easy."

More Figma pros

"We have used this solution for remote or virtual brainstorming sessions. We're a 100% remote company and therefore having that capability is important."

"It positively affected the productivity of our working and brainstorming sessions. It was definitely a saver for us because we wanted the agenda to be addressed as soon as possible. We were able to do that, and this solution was pretty useful for us."

"In terms of the productivity of our brainstorming sessions, it has probably made us 80 percent more efficient."

"Lucidspark has allowed my team to better communicate visually when it comes to explaining how different things work and then how they go together."

"The solution’s virtual whiteboard for brainstorming is great. It feels like I have an endless board where I can zoom out and draw everybody to what I'm looking at. It's invaluable, especially right now when most people work remotely."

"The whole reason why I use Lucidspark and Lucidchart is because of the way that I collaborate with other people, e.g., if I send somebody a document that it is more difficult to use because I have to convert everything to a PDF. With Lucidspark, I can give them a link. They can open it up, then they can move things around. That is very helpful. That is one of the reasons why I like using it. It's kind of like Basecamp with art."

"How easy it is to use is the best feature."

"Lucidspark has made us very productive because it was very easy to make the changes once we had our brainstorming session."

More Lucidspark pros

Cons

"Typing a prompt to express what I have in mind is quite complicated."

"One of the areas for improvement is the onboarding experience. When you first starting using Figma, it can be a little confusing. It would be useful to have some guidance and direction."

"Sometimes the prototype view menu gets in the way of navigation, especially if the prototype has a menu at the top, and most of the time it does."

"One negative aspect about our main use case or how we used Figma in that project is that the notifications were a little bit difficult to follow."

"The product could be improved by addressing performance issues such as slowness, particularly with heavy or high-resolution images."

"There is one aspect of Figma that needs improvement."

"Figma could be made more user-friendly."

"Figma is costly, especially when sharing with others as you have to upgrade your plan."

More Figma cons

"The user interface is not intuitive because I have used other applications previously, and it took a little bit more time. Once I figured that out how to save shapes, that was super helpful, but it did take probably one or two times to get there. Once I understood it, it made a lot of sense."

"The user experience of having them all have to set up a free account to join me in a workspace is a bit cumbersome."

"Even though Lucidspark is the only one that I have found that allows me to do what I want to do, the program doesn't have enough to actually make it easy for me."

"They have a grid system for snapping too, and they've done a lot to try to line things up so that the lines don't squiggle when you draw a line between one item and another. Everything has to be lined up. Everything has to be 90 degrees exact. But a lot of other people on the team just throw something together really quickly and the lines are not straight. And so it would be nice to have some feature that eliminates that problem."

"It would be really helpful if more features and templates would be added to the product."

"Using my iPad, it seems clunky and isn't as responsive as my PC."

"One thing that I noticed, when I was creating a document or something else, is a lot of empty space. If I am creating from a particular position, there is a lot of empty space above it. I am not sure why this happens. If there is a solution for this, then it would help."

"Depending on how much Lucidspark wants to emulate a true whiteboard experience, there could be other ways to do things."

More Lucidspark cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Sigma's pricing is reasonable and accessible for both small and large firms."

"There is room for improvement in terms of the cost. It should all be bundled together. It's becoming like a Microsoft, where you have to buy all the different version features separately. It should just all be bundled with one price."

"I know that to get 10 seats for Spark is $2000 a year, which struck me as a little high."

"It would be better if I didn't use Lucidspark at all and just used Illustrator and Photoshop, but it doesn't make sense for my projects to do that. It would remove a tremendous amount of steps, but it would cost a tremendous amount of money."

"The licensing is a fair price. We mainly have single users. We chose not to do the team user because of the cost. We didn't see a need for that at this point. We have talked to Lucidchart and Lucidspark salesmen often about that."

"One must pay extra if he wishes to have a higher level product."

"It's a very reasonable $8 a month. That makes it really accessible and helps it fill a pretty significant need for virtual collaboration. Just about every leadership team member that I've talked to said, 'Oh, well, that's cheap, just go buy it.'"

"The pricing is very reasonable. It is more expensive than some of the free options out there but much cheaper than Visio, and it works much better."

"I personally had a hard time getting the licenses sorted out. In the organizational license, the whole process took a lot of time. Personally, I feel that the licensing could be done much better on that front."

More Lucidspark pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Visual Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

Which would you choose - Miro or Figma?

Windows Server integrates well with all Microsoft and many other mainstream solutions. Building a Failover Cluster is comparatively much easier in Windows Server than with other solutions. We reall...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Figma?

Figma is deployed in my organization as we pay for it at $20 a month for a few seats. I am just a designer, so you are asking the wrong person about this.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Figma?

Figma can be improved because it is a closed ecosystem.

See all answers

LucidChart vs LucidSpark for brainstorming sessions over Zoom

Hi @Krista Thompson - Yes, LucidSpark is a much more nimble and, in some ways, user-friendly tool than LucidChart. LucidSpark is designed to do a better job managing multiple users participating ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Miro Business - Enterprise vs Figma

Compared 81% of the time

Lucidchart vs Figma

Compared 7% of the time

MURAL vs Figma

Compared 2% of the time

Vani vs Figma

Compared 2% of the time

Creately vs Figma

Compared 1% of the time

More Figma Competitors

Lucidchart vs Lucidspark

Compared 32% of the time

Miro Business - Enterprise vs Lucidspark

Compared 27% of the time

MURAL vs Lucidspark

Compared 13% of the time

Revvity Signals Notebook vs Lucidspark

Compared 6% of the time

More Lucidspark Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Figma

November 2026

Download Figma product report

Buyer's Guide

Lucidspark

October 2026

Download Lucidspark product report

Overview

Figma offers a comprehensive platform for collaborative design, enabling teams to work seamlessly on web-based projects with advanced features like AI capabilities and plugin integration.

Figma stands out in the design realm through its intuitive interface and robust collaborative tools that facilitate efficient feedback and sharing. It integrates smoothly with external tools and supports sophisticated prototyping, making it a preferred choice among UX/UI designers and developers. Its UI library and design system tools enhance consistency, allowing designers to concentrate on creative aspects without needing additional software.

What are Figma's most important features?

Collaborative Features: Facilitate real-time teamwork, enhancing project synchronicity.
AI Capabilities: Streamline design processes, reducing tedious tasks.
Plugin Integration: Expand functionality with ease, tailoring to specific workflow needs.
Interactive Components: Improve user engagement through dynamic design elements.
Design System Tools: Maintain consistency across projects efficiently.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Time-Saving UI Library: Speeds up design phase, allowing more focus on innovation.
Enhanced Prototyping: Offers thorough testing before final implementation.
Feedback & Sharing Facilitation: Boosts collaboration effectiveness.
Integration with Developer Tools: Ensures a smooth transition from design to development.
Comprehensive Creative Tools: Allows expanding design possibilities without multiple software.

Figma is widely implemented across industries for designing prototypes and UI screens, especially web interfaces. UX/UI designers, web developers, and design teams leverage its capabilities for crafting wireframes, mockups, and prototypes. The collaboration and integration features are instrumental in creating landing pages, dashboards, and other design projects efficiently.

Figma

Lucidspark offers an innovative platform for real-time collaboration, integrating an intuitive interface with an infinite whiteboard that supports extensive brainstorming and workflow enhancement.

Lucidspark is designed to facilitate team interaction, streamline collaboration, and enhance creativity. With a seamless blend of Collaborator Colors, drag-and-drop features, and expansive integrations, it fosters an efficient organization of ideas through diagrams, sticky notes, and exports. While users benefit from its flexibility in remote environments, there is a desire for improvements in internal comment systems, smoother integration with Microsoft apps, and more intuitive onboarding processes. Navigation on large boards and the absence of a dedicated desktop app are recognized challenges, prompting a call for enhanced shape recognition, color options, and time-tracking tools.

What are Lucidspark's key features?

Real-time Collaboration: Enables teams to work together effectively, regardless of location.
Intuitive Interface: Simplifies navigation and encourages user engagement.
Infinite Whiteboard: Provides endless space for brainstorming and creativity.
Extensive Templates: Offers a variety of pre-designed templates to kickstart projects.
Seamless Integrations: Connects effortlessly with other tools to enhance workflow efficiency.

What benefits should users expect?

Enhanced Team Interaction: Promotes collaborative work environments using visual tools.
Increased Productivity: Streamlined processes aid in quick idea organization and execution.
Flexible Creativity Encouragement: Adapts to team needs, fostering innovative solutions.
Improved Remote Collaboration: Facilitates effective virtual meetings and sessions.

In industry-specific contexts, such as education and consultancy, Lucidspark serves as a vital tool for developing flowcharts, conducting strategy workshops, and mapping out processes. Teams in architecture and project management leverage it for diagram creation and idea ideation, while its virtual whiteboard capabilities support remote sessions and workshops, aiding consultants and enterprises in strategic planning and system organization.

Lucid Software

Sample Customers

Uber, Zoom, Deliveroo

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Figma vs. Lucidspark

September 2026

Free Report: Figma vs. Lucidspark

Find out what your peers are saying about Figma vs. Lucidspark and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Figma vs. Lucidspark report.

See our list of best Visual Collaboration Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Visual Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.