ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs InfluxDB comparison

ExtraHop Networks and InfluxData are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ExtraHop Networks is ranked #74, while InfluxData is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.9. ExtraHop Networks holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to InfluxData’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ExtraHop Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of InfluxData users who would recommend it.

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Read 8 ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations reviews

1,504 Views
1,098 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

InfluxDB

Read 17 InfluxDB reviews

3,182 Views
573 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

InfluxDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ExtraHop Reveal(x) and InfluxDB compete in network monitoring and data management. ExtraHop has an advantage in real-time analytics and network visibility, while InfluxDB excels in handling large data volumes efficiently.

Features: ExtraHop Reveal(x) provides real-time analytics, anomaly detection, and automated insights for optimizing network performance. InfluxDB specializes in time-series data management, enabling complex queries, efficient data handling, and scalability for data-heavy applications.

Room for Improvement: ExtraHop could enhance support for broader data integration, lower its setup costs, and improve handling of large datasets. InfluxDB might benefit from more responsive customer service, streamlined integration with external tools, and enhanced real-time data processing capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtraHop is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive support, making installation simple for networks. InfluxDB offers lightweight, flexible deployment with comprehensive documentation, although customer support quality varies.

Pricing and ROI: ExtraHop's premium network monitoring features result in higher initial setup costs, but many find the ROI justified by comprehensive analytics. InfluxDB offers a cost-effective solution, attractive for developers requiring efficient data storage and scaling within budget constraints.

To learn more, read our detailed ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. InfluxDB Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. InfluxDB

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,176 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT O...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

74th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Diagnostics (11th), IT Operations Analytics (14th), Network Packet Capture (6th)

InfluxDB

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

23rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Non-Relational Databases (2nd), Open Source Databases (8th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (21st), NoSQL Databases (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InfluxDB is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
InfluxDB	0.3%
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations	0.6%
Other	99.1%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Out West

Project Manager and IT Management Consultant at a integrator with 1,001-5,000 employees

Great for identifying application interdependencies with helpful support but needs better visualizations

We're just trying to identify the application interdependencies, which normally reside on different servers, including web servers, database servers, enterprise service bus, et cetera, up to your presentation layer before we start moving stuff around. Normally, the reason why we use these tools is to understand what assets we have, where they're deployed, and how they enter and operate before we decide to go move something from point A to point B. The solution is going to allow me to establish a wave or migration plan where you have different waves of migration and then you actually have move groups to try and get your application moved from A to B seamlessly. A to B could be on-premise to on-premise. It could be on-premise to cloud. Et cetera. The solution can tell me what components can I deploy, for example, into a cloud space, without having to refactor my applications since that can be quite time-consuming and costly.

Read full review

Mugeesh Husain

Team Lead, Software at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees

Time series data has been managed efficiently for IoT sensors but reporting still needs improvement

How InfluxDB can be improved is relevant since for Energy Box, we face certain issues. We have customers worldwide, including the United States, United Kingdom, and Europe, but when we expanded to China two years ago, they indicated that they do not support the cloud version there. Our application is built on the cloud, which required us to create a separate application for Azure China, which was painful for us. The second issue involves frequent version changes. For example, we started with version one, transitioned to version two, and I heard they are considering InfluxDB version three, reverting to earlier practices. InfluxDB should improve without completely changing its approach. Now we have to redo our work for InfluxDB version three. Regarding needed improvements, the documentation is sufficient, but pricing presents a challenge. InfluxDB has standard pricing, which is acceptable for large companies. However, for startups in our position, they should provide special discounts so everyone can utilize it. The pricing should adapt as companies grow, which is a reasonable expectation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are many valuable features in this product, but probably the biggest is the customization capability it has."

"This solution is more applications reference architecture focused. Its benefit is that it specializes in that space."

"The most valuable feature is the way it handles data, from Layer 2 up to Layer 7. We can see everything that happens in the network."

"Wire data analytics."

"Not only can you look at the protocol import level. It also has a live PCAP analysis."

"The most valuable features are security detections, perimeter detection, dashboards, and alerts."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is we can use InfluxDB to integrate with and plug into any other tools."

"The user interface is well-designed and easy to use. It provides a clear overview of the data, making it simple to understand the information at hand."

"Overall, InfluxDB delivered excellent performance, stability, and simplicity for telemetry-driven use cases."

"The most valuable features are aggregating the data and integration with Graphana for monitoring."

"My advice for others looking into using InfluxDB is to use it the same way I did, because it is really stable, easy and friendly to use, and it is a great product overall."

"It helps me maintain my solution easily because it is very reliable, so we didn't face any performance issues or crashes regarding our queries; we can get the results very fast."

"InfluxDB works as expected with excellent scalability and stability, which is critical for our application."

"While I would rate InfluxDB a ten on a scale of one to ten, users should be thoughtful about matching the engine to their specific needs."

More InfluxDB pros

Cons

"This solution would be improved if it had the ability to retain data longer."

"Network visibility is something that needs to be improved."

"They either have to go broad or decide what their bread and butter is and get really good at that."

"They have a new solution, ExtraHop Reveal(x), and I think it needs improvement."

"I would improve the Rule-Based Access Control (RBAC) by providing granular access control to the data."

"We'd like to see a local presence within the region in order to have seamless service whether it's the support, the implementation, or professional services."

"The error logging capability can be improved because the logs are not very informative."

"It is challenging to get long-running backups while running InfluxDB in a Microsoft Azure Kubernetes cluster."

"The interface of InfluxDB is so complex and should be made easier for non-technical people."

"However, I cannot ignore the challenges I faced while configuring the database with my message brokers, whether Rabbit or Kafka, because the documentation is not properly provided."

"The solution's UI can be more user-friendly."

"The solution doesn't have much of a user interface."

"InfluxDB is generally stable, but we've encountered issues with the configuration file in our ticket stack. For instance, a mistake in one of the metrics out of a hundred KPIs can disrupt data collection for all KPIs. This happens because the agent stops working if there's an issue with any configuration part. To address this, it is essential to ensure that all configurations are part of the agent's EXE file when provided. This makes it easier to package the agent for server installation and ensures all KPIs are available from the server. Additionally, the agent cannot encrypt and decrypt passwords for authentication, which can be problematic when monitoring URLs or requiring authentication tokens. This requires additional scripting and can prolong service restart times."

"InfluxDB can improve by including new metrics on other technologies. They had some changes recently to pool data from endpoints but the functionality is not good enough in the industry."

More InfluxDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair considering the value provided."

"The price of this solution for our environment is about £650,000 ($855,000 USD) for three years."

"The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it."

"InfluxDB recently increased its price. It is very expensive now."

"InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."

"We are using the open-source version of InfluxDB."

"The tool is an open-source product."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

12%

Educational Organization

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about InfluxDB?

InfluxDB is a database where you can insert data. However, it would be best if you had different components for alerting, data sending, and visualization. You need to install tools to collect data ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with InfluxDB?

Although I didn't encounter any significant challenges, I think that if there was a NoSQL version of InfluxDB, that would also help because I have used the SQL version. I wish InfluxDB were also av...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for InfluxDB?

My main use case for InfluxDB involved working on a LEO satellite KPI monitoring application, where I gathered latency, throughput, packet loss, jitter, and various types of network data for severa...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Observability Cloud vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 15% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 7% of the time

Netrounds vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 7% of the time

ThousandEyes vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 6% of the time

ExtremeAnalytics vs ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

Compared 6% of the time

More ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations Competitors

ClickHouse vs InfluxDB

Compared 18% of the time

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB

Compared 11% of the time

SQLite vs InfluxDB

Compared 9% of the time

PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 7% of the time

MySQL vs InfluxDB

Compared 5% of the time

More InfluxDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations

January 2026

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations report

Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations product report

Buyer's Guide

InfluxDB

January 2026

Download InfluxDB product report

Overview

The ExtraHop Application Performance Management Solution Delivers Unified Visibility Across the IT Environment w/ Proactive Alerts & Accelerated Troubleshooting

ExtraHop Networks

InfluxDB is open-source software that helps developers and enterprises alike to collect, store, process, and visualize time series data and to build next-generation applications. InfluxDB provides monitoring and insight on IoT, application, system, container, and infrastructure quickly and easily without complexities or compromises in scale, speed, or productivity.

InfluxDB has become a popular insight system for unified metrics and events enabling the most demanding SLAs. InfluxDB is used in just about every type of industry across a wide range of use cases, including network monitoring, IoT monitoring, industrial IoT, and infrastructure and application monitoring.

InfluxDB offers its users:

Infrastructure and application monitoring: Collect, process, and analyze real-time data from edge devices to help optimize distributed infrastructure.

IoT monitoring and analytics: InfluxDB is designed to store large volumes of time series data and quickly perform real-time analysis on that data. Gain insights from all the sensor data and use the collected data to create and perform automated tasks.

Network monitoring: Manage responsive and high-performing networks with widely distributed resources.

InfluxDB Benefits

There are several benefits to using InfluxDB . Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

APIs and ready toolset: InfluxDB can be accessed via a set of powerful tools enabling users to get started quickly, with less programming required. This includes a REST API, extensive client libraries, a wide variety of open-source integrations, and Flux - a functional data scripting language for querying, analysis, and events. The InfluxDB API can be used to write data from edge devices to the InfluxDB instance

Time series engine: Get any data - events, logs, traces - from any edge device - systems, sensors, queues, databases, and networks. This data is stored in a powerful and high-performing engine capable of ingesting millions of data points per second.

Community: InfluxDB has a large community of cloud and open-source developers ready to assist users.

Ready-made templates: Use InfluxDB Templates, a set of tools with a packager and other ready monitoring solutions. These tools allow users to share their monitoring expertise with coworkers and other community members around the world. The Templates gallery offers available templates for some of the most popular tools and applications.

Enhanced UI: InfluxDB’s UI includes an explorer, dashboarding tools, and a script editor. Use it to easily browse the collected metric and event data and apply common transformations. The dashboarding tool comes with a variety of visualization options that help users view insights from the data. The script editor assists users to quickly master Flux with easily accessible examples, auto-completion, and real-time syntax checking.

Reviews from Real Users

InfluxDB stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its data aggregation feature.

Shalauddin Ahamad S., a software engineer at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features are aggregating the data and the integration with Grafana for monitoring.”

InfluxData

Sample Customers

Alaska Airlines, bet365, Concur, McKesson, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Practice Fusion, Seattle Children's Hospital, Steward Health Care System

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

Buyer's Guide

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. InfluxDB

December 2025

Free Report: ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. InfluxDB

Find out what your peers are saying about ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. InfluxDB and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. InfluxDB report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.