Exago BI vs QlikView comparison

Exago and Qlik are both solutions in the Embedded BI category. Exago is ranked #24, while Qlik is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4. Exago holds a 1.0% mindshare in EBT, compared to Qlik’s 9.2% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution.

Exago BI

108 Views
87 Comparison Views

QlikView

Read 163 QlikView reviews

3,555 Views
1,244 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Exago BI

QlikView

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Exago BI and QlikView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, Qlik, MicroStrategy and others in Embedded BI.

To learn more, read our detailed Embedded BI Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Embedded BI

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,844 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Exago BI

Ranking in Embedded BI

24th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QlikView

Ranking in Embedded BI

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

163

Ranking in other categories

Reporting (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Embedded BI category, the mindshare of Exago BI is 1.0%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QlikView is 9.2%, up from 8.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Embedded BI Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
QlikView	9.2%
Exago BI	1.0%
Other	89.8%

Embedded BI

Featured Reviews

Use Exago BI?

Leave a review

Morne Ayres

Managing Director at Hurricnae

Rapid development and flexibility transform commercial decision-making processes

In QlikView, I believe the improvement that should be made is to bring the costs down, as you'll have to be competitive with Power BI, aiming for at least a 30% reduction to stop the hemorrhaging to Power BI, considering that you're losing a lot of customers to Power BI. Reducing costs is the main improvement needed, as this is the biggest burden currently faced in the South African market, with Microsoft converting QlikView customers due to the perceived cost reduction. I am aware of several big corporations, such as Sanofi and Aspen Pharmacare, which have left QlikView due to cost issues.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Embedded BI solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user79932

Senior Manager - BI Head with 5,001-10,000 employees

Feb 4, 2015

Comparison of SAP BO, Tableau, QlikView, Cognos, Microsoft, OBIEE and Pentaho

1. SAP BO/BI Enterprise scalability Security Ease of use Semantic layer 2. Tableau Visualization Data discovery Turnaround time 3. IBM Cognos Enterprise scalability Security In-memory feature 4. MS BI - Flexibility 5. Pentaho - Open source but still enterprise grade 6. QlikView Data…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	76

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about QlikView?

If you correctly use the product for your use cases, it provides value for money.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QlikView?

I would rate the pricing for QlikView as not cheap, but it is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QlikView?

We are not using analytics features and possibly predictive analytics and forecasting features in QlikView, although they are available. QlikView is very flexible, but we are currently using only t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tableau Enterprise vs Exago BI

Compared 52% of the time

Qlik Sense vs Exago BI

Compared 48% of the time

More Exago BI Competitors

Tableau Enterprise vs QlikView

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs QlikView

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon QuickSight vs QlikView

Compared 8% of the time

MicroStrategy vs QlikView

Compared 6% of the time

Zendesk vs QlikView

Compared 5% of the time

More QlikView Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Embedded BI

January 2026

Download Exago BI product report

Buyer's Guide

QlikView

January 2026

Download QlikView product report

Overview

Exago is a full-featured BI solution with four distinct report designers that can be enabled in any combination to accommodate end users with different levels of expertise.

Exago

QlikView is a Business Intelligence tool that allows you to keep tabs on all of your business-related information in a clean, clear, and easy to access database that is intuitive to build and simple to navigate. It is ideal for business owners who wish to improve overall output by creating the most productive system possible.

Qlik

Sample Customers

Computershare Governance Services, Ntracts, Autotask

Canon, Gatorade, Amcor, Panasonic, Fila, Cambridge University Hospitals, Global Retail Bank, North Yorkshire Police department, Lanoo Group Publishers, and AonGroep Nederland.

Find out what your peers are saying about Salesforce, Qlik, MicroStrategy and others in Embedded BI. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Embedded BI vendors.

We monitor all Embedded BI reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.