Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Evanios vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence comparison

Evanios and Broadcom are both solutions in the Event Monitoring category. Evanios is ranked #17, while Broadcom is ranked #13. Evanios holds a 0.6% mindshare in EM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Evanios users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
Evanios
Read 6 Evanios reviews
  • 48 Views
  • 27 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...
Read 27 OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reviews
  • 205 Views
  • 125 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence and Evanios are competing solutions in IT operations management. Evanios holds the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set, making it a preferred choice despite OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence's positive pricing and customer support.

Features: OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence offers strong mainframe monitoring, automated workflows enhancing system efficiency, and command rules for versatile automation. Evanios provides extensive event correlation, ITSM integration, and a robust agent architecture for a holistic IT management approach.

Room for Improvement: OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence could enhance cross-platform capabilities, expand integration options, and improve event management customization. Evanios could simplify its learning curve, optimize resource usage during heavy loads, and streamline initial setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence features straightforward deployment with minimal configuration and responsive support. Evanios offers cloud-based deployment with flexible options but requires more effort initially. Their customer service is known for proactive engagement.

Pricing and ROI: OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence offers a cost-effective entry, delivering steady ROI through reduced overhead. Evanios, though more costly upfront, promises greater long-term ROI via extensive event management and integration efficiencies. Its pricing reflects the value of its comprehensive features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Evanios vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Evanios vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Evanios
Ranking in Event Monitoring
17th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (69th), IT Operations Analytics (18th)
OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...
Ranking in Event Monitoring
13th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Mainframe Management (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of Evanios is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 2.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Event Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

it_user592602 - PeerSpot reviewer
The vendor is willing to work with us and develop solutions for products they did not already have an integration for.
As with any new software implementation, during the integration we found a couple of minor issues when integrating certain products (such as SCOM). However, each time this happened Evanios was very quick to identify the bug we were seeing, patch it and provide the new update set for us to install. Also, during the evaluation of Evanios we found that they already had integrations with most of our larger monitoring tools, however they also stated that they would be able to create update sets to integrate certain products we used that they did not currently support. This proved to be very valuable for us because they were able to become an even better fit for our organization by creating update sets\integrations for PRTG, Quest Foglight, TIBCO and Thousand Eyes as well.
Read full review
it_user351621 - PeerSpot reviewer
The ability to use command rules is great when our operators have repetitive tasks, but we'd like to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is.
One of the things we've been wanting to do is to be able to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is. For example, we'd like to be able to create some generic automation when we receive a warning or alert message to allow, if nothing else, the automation team to know so we can contact the product owner. If there's something we can do to automate or expedite notification to the proper people, we want to try to do that.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Provided up to a 90% noise reduction in some our noisy monitoring tools."
"The ability to manipulate events via JavaScript getting the exact data that we want."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with various alert-generating systems because you might have synthetic alerts or monitoring alerts for volume drops."
"Stability is probably the best out-of-the-box. Put it in, set it up, and you leave it alone. It works wonderfully."
"Valuable features include: SSM, which provides for orderly startup and shutdown; OPSLOG, which enables filtering by message-id, and/or jobname(s); Rules, as OPS/REXX interface streamlines deployment, interfaces easily with JES2 and z/OS."
"​The service has been wonderful. I like the people that I have had to deal with. The process is very straightforward. I call or use the website."
"Their technical support is incredible, immediately responsive, and even if it is not updated to Level 2 support sometimes, they chip in providing more detailed answers and options to fix the problem."
"It alerts the operators when it is time to repair the communications and the IPLs."
"It reduces the number of repetitive motions required by a human to respond to the system."
"The documentation is simple, easy to follow, and use. A limited, first-time systems programmer can do it, in that it is out-of-the-box almost functional."
"​The follow-up surprised me. Making sure that I am happy with what I have gone to them on. They will call after I have made changes and verify that I am happy with the changes that I did have to make. If it did not fix the complete problem, they go back over it until I am satisfied.​"
More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros
 

Cons

"The price could be cheaper."
"We would like the ability to have an "exit" option for events when they are being processed."
"More complex correlation rules would be nice. The ability to clearly define a parent event in a correlation and nested correlations, specifically."
"Performing a stop/restart of OPS/MVS could be a little smoother. Without special coding, some undesired tasks will be started and some necessary tasks will be stopped if we have to bounce OPS/MVS during the day."
"One thing that comes to mind is the MQ interface. The last time we tried to use it, it seemed a little clunky."
"The further expansion of the mainframe teamcenter interface. Also, the web services support is something that I am looking into."
"Some of the command sequences are too long."
"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script.​"
"​It’s a complex product. The initial installation is easy, but implementing various functions is a constant process.​"
"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."
"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."
More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
21%
Logistics Company
21%
Computer Software Company
13%
Insurance Company
12%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
CA Automation Point vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Logo
CA Automation Point vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence
Compared 100% of the time
More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Evanios
April 2025
Evanios reportDownload Evanios product report
Buyer's Guide
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence
April 2025
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reportDownload OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation
 

Overview

A key component of the Event Management process is consolidation of events from across the enterprise. By consolidating disparate events into a single solution, they can be de-duplicated and correlated. For example, network failure events can be correlated with system failures, and then prioritized based on service impact.

Reduce the noise

Evanios Integrations allows filtering and processing close to the event source, keeping the weight off of the ServiceNow system for increased performance. Filters are easily configured. EVA, the Evanios consolidation point also has built in event flood control features, to protect against unexpected event storms which can quickly overload traditional integrations.

Evanios
z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.
Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

Greenville Health System, Land O’Lakes, AstraZeneca
Tieto
Buyer's Guide
Evanios vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence
April 2025
Free Report: Evanios vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence
Find out what your peers are saying about Evanios vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Evanios vs. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence report.
See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.