Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ESP Workload Automation Intelligence vs UiPath Orchestrator comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ESP Workload Automation Int...
Ranking in Workload Automation
22nd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Orchestrator
Ranking in Workload Automation
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is 2.1%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Orchestrator is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Workload Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
UiPath Orchestrator0.9%
ESP Workload Automation Intelligence2.1%
Other97.0%
Workload Automation
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1609584 - PeerSpot reviewer
Stable, connects with everything, and has great technical support
The new version is going to have more web services where you could string together various web services so that you can create a workflow across multiple web services, which I don't think is there today. It's not easy to do today. You have to use other tools to accomplish things. However, if the functionality exists, we haven't tested that out yet.
Bantu Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Improves operational efficiency through its centralized dashboard and asset management
There are overwhelming features added to UiPath Orchestrator, which can lead to complexities. Permissions, roles, and queues sometimes result in conflicts, requiring deeper understanding. I would prefer if the tool was more intuitive, and it is important to maintain simplicity instead of combining multiple functionalities, potentially through different licensing models to restrict features.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution can scale."
"The platform serves as a valuable tool for orchestrating solutions within an organization."
"UiPath Orchestrator is a stable solution."
"The logs are the best feature of the solution."
"UiPath Orchestrator has helped us by replacing manual processes with automation."
"From what I have seen, it is a reliable tool."
"The reporting features are good."
"Assets and logs are valuable."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
 

Cons

"The new version is going to have more web services where you could string together various web services so that you can create a workflow across multiple web services, which I don't think is there today."
"It's a bit difficult to connect to the licenses."
"The licensing cost associated with the tool is too high. If the tool can reduce the license cost, most of the organizations will opt for it."
"They could provide a more intuitive UI for the product."
"UiPath Orchestrator needs to focus on dashboards."
"The product must conduct more promotional activities and webinars."
"The major issue is with the application according to the new version of the UI."
"The solution must provide more AI capabilities."
"I am interested in seeing more features like document understanding and AI integration."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The product’s pricing is competitive."
"The pricing is reasonable and competitive."
"The pricing seems reasonable based on project requirements."
"The product is expensive."
"Larger organizations may benefit from more favorable pricing, as the costs can be distributed across more licenses."
"The product is expensive."
"I rate UiPath Orchestrator's pricing a six out of ten."
"The pricing is quite reasonable, particularly with the cloud version where Orchestrator is included in all other licenses at no additional cost."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.
865,985 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
41%
Retailer
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise20
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about UiPath Orchestrator?
Using UiPath Orchestrator, we can deploy tasks across different environments, including virtual machines, for both attended and unattended processes.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Orchestrator?
Regarding licensing costs and setup costs, the pricing is on the higher side compared to other RPA solutions that are entering the market, which are much cheaper, and sometimes we cannot retain cus...
What needs improvement with UiPath Orchestrator?
In future updates of UiPath Orchestrator, I would want to see something that allows typing basic details of the workflow, which can then be used to design a text message workflow. As of now, almost...
 

Also Known As

CA Workload Automation ESP
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sandvik, DHL, Landmark Group, SAIF
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Broadcom, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: August 2025.
865,985 professionals have used our research since 2012.