ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform vs GitLab comparison

"The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic."

"GitLab is scalable and works well with multiple environments."

"If you want to maintain your issues in GitLab and raise your book of work and features, then GitLab is a great tool for collaboration and integration with code deployment and CICD pipelines."

"Their CI/CD engine is very mature. It's very comprehensive and flexible, and compared to other projects, I believe that GitLab is number one right now from that perspective."

"Key features allow creation of well-presented Wiki that includes ideas, development, and domains."

"The scalability is good."

"I recommend GitLab for DevOps engineers."

"The solution's most valuable feature is that it is compatible with GitHub. The product's integration capabilities are sufficient for our small company of 35 people."

"Git hosting has an integration with ACD which is why we liked this solution in the first place."

"The anomaly detection could be improved."

"The pricing model of GitLab is an issue for me."

"I would like more Agile features in the Premium version. The Premium version should have all Agile features that exist in the Ultimate version. IBM AOM has a complete Agile implementation, but in GitLab, you only have these features if you buy the Ultimate version. It would be good if we can use these in the Premium version."

"I have encountered issues with the deployment of CI/CD pipelines, especially dealing with variable environments."

"It has fewer options, and its UI is not so user-friendly."

"When deploying the solution on cloud and the CI/CD pipeline, we have to define the steps and it becomes confusing."

"It would be better if there weren't any outages. There are occasions where we usually see a lot of outages using GitLab. It happens at least once a week or something like that. Whatever pipelines you're running, to check the logs, you need to have a different set of tools like Argus or something like that. If you have pipelines running on GitLab, you need a separate service deployed to view the logs, which is kind of a pain. If the logs can be used conveniently on GitLab, that would be definitely helpful. I'm not talking about the CI/CD pipelines but the back-end services and microservices deployed over GitLab. To view the logs for those microservices, you need to have separate log viewers, which is kind of a pain."

"There is room for improvement in GitLab Agents."

"GitLab should work on improving their user interface for GitOps as it is lagging behind."

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

"The open-source version is very good and the commercial version is reasonably priced."

"GitLab is an open-source solution."

"In total, I believe we have more than 300 licenses spread over about 100 users, though I can't comment on the costs involved."

"We are currently using the open-source version."

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."

"The price is okay."