Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform vs GitLab comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity...
Ranking in Application Security Tools
40th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GitLab
Ranking in Application Security Tools
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
89
Ranking in other categories
Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (9th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (4th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform is 0.6%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab is 2.1%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
GitLab2.1%
ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform0.6%
Other97.3%
Application Security Tools
 

Featured Reviews

TO
Consulting Partner, Cyber Security Delivery - Africa at DeltaGRiC Consulting
Good core scanning, a helpful GDPR assessment template and very good technical support
The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic. The last time we did it, the customer was trying to make the SAP system match the GDPR process. We were able to use it for that benchmark. It was very important. The GDPR assessment template that is being used in the process application benchmark and analyzing landscape came in very handy. It was very useful because it also gave notifications.
KS
Site Reliability Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Centralized automation has transformed our devops workflow and now delivers faster reliable releases
A pain point I have encountered with GitLab is that large GitLab-ci.yml files become hard to read and maintain. YAML syntax is strict, and errors are easy to make, while debugging pipeline logic can sometimes take time, leading to slower iteration when the pipeline grows complex. I propose an improvement idea of better visual pipeline editors and stronger validations and linting before a commit. Regarding runner management and scaling, managing self-hosted runners requires effort and scaling runners during peak usage can be challenging, which leads to pipeline delays during high load. An expected improvement here is smarter auto-scaling by default, along with better runner health visibility and alerts. Concerning security features, advanced security scans are locked behind paid tiers, limiting coverage for smaller teams unless the budget allows. I suggest introducing more basic security features in the free tier and clearer guidance on prioritizing vulnerabilities. Another area for improvement is UI performance and navigation. Finding older pipelines or logs or settings sometimes takes extra clicks, leading to small but noticeable productivity loss. An improvement would be a faster UI for large repositories and enhanced global search and filtering.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic."
"When a developer checks in code, it is automatically built and deployed, and automated test cases are also run. We have extensive integration with GitLab, which helps us with source code management. We run the static code analysis using SonarQube."
"The important feature is the entire process of versioning source code maintenance and easy deployment. It is a necessity for the CI/CD pipeline."
"The solution's service delivery model is fantastic."
"The most valuable feature of GitLab is its convenience. I am able to trace back most of my changes up to a far distance in time and it helps me to analyze and see the older version of the code."
"The user interface is really good so that helps with huge teams who need to collaborate."
"This is a scalable solution. We had around 200 users working with it."
"The SaaS setup is impressive, and it has DAST solutioning."
"The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good."
 

Cons

"The anomaly detection could be improved."
"Currently, GitLab is not easy to scale because GitLab has specific deployment instructions. We deploy it on one of the VMs."
"GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly."
"The initial setup was quite challenging because it takes some time to understand how to pull out or push the code."
"I have encountered issues with the deployment of CI/CD pipelines, especially dealing with variable environments."
"The only thing our company is really waiting on in terms of features is the development of metrics."
"The solution should again offer an on-premises deployment option."
"Reporting could be improved."
"There is room for improvement in GitLab Agents."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
"The open-source version is very good and the commercial version is reasonably priced."
"The initial setup cost is excellent and you can add the premium features later."
"The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
"GitLab is a free solution to use."
"I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
879,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
11%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business36
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise44
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about GitLab?
I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?
We are currently using general GitLab, not GitLab Premium.
What needs improvement with GitLab?
GitLab can be improved by being more responsive in the UI and offering better pricing for premium features, which would be useful for small startups. While GitLab's CI/CD is powerful, it is somewha...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Fuzzit
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Wired
1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: January 2026.
879,455 professionals have used our research since 2012.