ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform vs GitLab comparison

"The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic."

"The most valuable feature of GitLab is its convenience. I am able to trace back most of my changes up to a far distance in time and it helps me to analyze and see the older version of the code."

"The important feature is the entire process of versioning source code maintenance and easy deployment. It is a necessity for the CI/CD pipeline."

"GitLab is being used as a repository for our codebase and it is a one stop DevOps tool we use in our team."

"Key features allow creation of well-presented Wiki that includes ideas, development, and domains."

"GitLab is very useful for pipelines, continuous integration, and continuous deployment. It is also stable."

"GitLab integrates well with other platforms."

"Continuous integration with deployment is very powerful, which is a significant reason for migrating from TFS to GitLab."

"The most valuable features of GitLab are the review, patch repo, and plans are in YAML."

"The anomaly detection could be improved."

"GitLab can improve by integrating with more tools, such as servers with Docker."

"You need to have a good knowledge of the product in order to use it."

"It is a little complex to set up the pipelines within the solution."

"GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly."

"I would like to see AI support in GitLab."

"GitLab doesn't have AWS integration. It would be better to have integration with other container management environments beyond Kubernetes. It has very good integration with Kubernetes, but it doesn't have good integration with, for example, AWS, ETS, etc."

"When deploying the solution on cloud and the CI/CD pipeline, we have to define the steps and it becomes confusing."

"I would like to see static analysis also embedded in GitLab. That would also help us. If there's something that it does internally by GitLab and then that is already tied up with your pipeline and then it can tell you that you're coding is good or your code is not great. Based on that, it would pass or fail. That should be streamlined. I would think that would help to a greater extent, in terms of having one solution rather than depending on multiple vendors."

"Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."

"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

"GitLab is comparatively expensive, but it provides value because it's feature-rich."

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"The solution is based on a licensing model that includes technical support and is paid annually."

"This product is not very expensive but the price can be better."

"The open-source version is very good and the commercial version is reasonably priced."

"I'm not aware of the licensing costs because those were covered by the customer."