ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform vs GitLab comparison

ERPScan and GitLab are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. ERPScan is ranked #46, while GitLab is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5. ERPScan holds a 0.3% mindshare in AS, compared to GitLab’s 2.5% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of GitLab users are willing to recommend the solution.

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity...

Read 1 ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform review

306 Views
291 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

GitLab

Read 86 GitLab reviews

19,204 Views
2,881 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity...

GitLab

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform and GitLab based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

46th

Average Rating

0.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitLab

Ranking in Application Security Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th), Rapid Application Development Software (11th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab is 2.5%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitLab	2.5%
ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform	0.3%
Other	97.2%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

TundeOgunkoya

Consulting Partner, Cyber Security Delivery - Africa at DeltaGRiC Consulting

Good core scanning, a helpful GDPR assessment template and very good technical support

The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic. The last time we did it, the customer was trying to make the SAP system match the GDPR process. We were able to use it for that benchmark. It was very important. The GDPR assessment template that is being used in the process application benchmark and analyzing landscape came in very handy. It was very useful because it also gave notifications.

Read full review

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic."

"As a developer, this solution is useful as a repository holder because most of the POC projects that we have are on GitLab."

"Key features allow creation of well-presented Wiki that includes ideas, development, and domains."

"We like that we can have an all-encompassing product and don't have to implement different solutions."

"Git merging allows us to track the details of how and who has done what; this is the best feature which is useful for all companies."

"The stability of GitLab is impressive."

"The solution has an established roadmap that lays out its plans for upgrades over the next two to three years."

"Git merging allows us to track the details of how and who has done what; this is the best feature which is useful for all companies."

"Continuous integration with deployment is very powerful, which is a significant reason for migrating from TFS to GitLab."

More GitLab pros

Cons

"The anomaly detection could be improved."

"Regarding improvements, making task management is something that GitLab can potentially make easier, similar to what DevOps or Jira does."

"GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly."

"It could have more security integrations and the ability to check the vulnerability of the code. I don't think it is a responsibility of Gitlab, but it would be nice to have more options to integrate with."

"The documentation could be improved to help newcomers better understand things like creating new branches."

"The only thing our company is really waiting on in terms of features is the development of metrics."

"GitLab needs to improve the CI/CD functionality because it is not compatible with Jenkins and other tools, as it is not that efficient."

"I'm new to GitLab, so I would appreciate more documentation about the code and commands."

"GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly."

More GitLab cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution's standard license is paid annually. They have changed the pricing model and it used to be better. There is a free version available."

"The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."

"There are different licensing options available, including a free limited-user license."

"It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."

"The solution's pricing is acceptable."

"Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."

"Regarding pricing, I would rate GitLab as moderately priced, maybe around a seven or eight out of ten. It could be more flexible for clients but generally offers good value."

"This is an open-source solution."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	9
Large Enterprise	42

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing and cost are on par with other tools and are neither too expensive nor cheap.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitLab?

Regarding improvements, making task management is something that GitLab can potentially make easier, similar to what DevOps or Jira does.

See all answers

Comparisons

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning vs ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform

Compared 100% of the time

More ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 34% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 13% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

August 2025

ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform report

Download ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

GitLab

September 2025

Download GitLab product report

Also Known As

No data available

Fuzzit

Overview

ERPScan’s primary mission is to bridge the gap between technical and business security, and provide solutions to evaluate and secure SAP and Oracle ERP systems and business-critical applications from both, cyber-attacks as well as internal fraud.

ERPScan

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

GitLab

Sample Customers

Wired

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

August 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.