We performed a comparison between ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform and Fortify on Demand based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."The core scanning, the scanning process, has got a very nice pass management module. It's fantastic."
"The features that I have found most valuable include its security scan, the vulnerability finds, and the web interface to search and review the issues."
"It has saved us a lot of time as we focus primarily on programming rather than tool operational work."
"The most valuable features of Micro Focus Fortify on Demand have been SAT analysis and application security."
"The vulnerability detection and scanning are awesome features."
"We have the option to test applications with or without credentials."
"The most valuable features are the server, scanning, and it has helped identify issues with the security analysis."
"The SAST feature is the most valuable."
"The scanning capabilities, particularly for our repositories, have been invaluable."
"The anomaly detection could be improved."
"It could have a little bit more streamlined installation procedure. Based on the things that I've done, it could also be a bit more automated. It is kind of taking a bunch of different scanners, and SSC is just kind of managing the results. The scanning doesn't really seem to be fully integrated into the SSC platform. More automation and any kind of integration in the SSC platform would definitely be good. There could be a way to initiate scans from SSC and more functionality on the server-side to initiate desk scans if it is not already available."
"Primarily for a complex, advanced website, they don't really understand some of the functionalities. So for instance, they could tell us that there is a vulnerability because somebody could possibly do something, but they don't really understand the code to realize that we actually negate that vulnerability through some other mechanism in the program. In addition, the technical support is just not there. We have open tickets. They don't respond. Even if they respond, we're not seeing eye to eye. As the company got sold and bought, the support got worse."
"If you have a continuous integration in place, for example, and you want it to run along with your build and you want it to be fast, you're not going to get it. It adds to your development time."
"Takes up a lot of resources which can slow things down."
"I would like the solution to add AI support."
"Micro Focus Fortify on Demand cannot be run from a Linux Agent. When we are coding the endpoint it will not work, we have to use Windows Agent. This is something they could improve."
"The vulnerability analysis does not always provide guidelines for what the developer should do in order to correct the problem, which means that the code has to be manually inspected and understood."
"This solution would be improved if the code-quality perspective were added to it, on top of the security aspect."
ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform is ranked 55th in Application Security Tools while Fortify on Demand is ranked 10th in Application Security Tools with 56 reviews. ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform is rated 0.0, while Fortify on Demand is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform writes "Good core scanning, a helpful GDPR assessment template and very good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortify on Demand writes "Provides good depth of scanning but is unfortunately not fully integrated with CIT processes ". ERPScan SMART Cybersecurity Platform is most compared with Onapsis, whereas Fortify on Demand is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Checkmarx One, Coverity and Fortify WebInspect.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
