Ephesoft Transact vs UiPath Document Understanding comparison

Ephesoft and UiPath are both solutions in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category. Ephesoft is ranked #19, while UiPath is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0. Ephesoft holds a 1.9% mindshare in IDP, compared to UiPath’s 12.5% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Ephesoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Ephesoft Transact

Read 3 Ephesoft Transact reviews

272 Views
121 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

UiPath Document Understanding

Read 52 UiPath Document Understanding reviews

2,526 Views
970 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Ephesoft Transact

UiPath Document Understanding

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Ephesoft Transact and UiPath Document Understanding compete in document automation. UiPath Document Understanding seems to have the upper hand with its sophisticated features and potential ROI, although Ephesoft Transact may offer benefits in support and pricing.

Features: Ephesoft Transact specializes in automated data extraction through intelligent capture, robust document capture, and efficient classification capabilities. UiPath Document Understanding shines with advanced machine learning for precise data extraction, seamless integration with broader automation workflows, and an AI-driven approach to comprehensive workflow automation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ephesoft Transact is known for straightforward deployment and strong documentation, supported by effective customer service across various channels. UiPath Document Understanding provides a low-code environment that simplifies implementation and scaling, backed by its broad support network, focusing on ease of use in automation strategies.

Pricing and ROI: Ephesoft Transact tends to offer a favorable setup cost for budget-conscious businesses. UiPath Document Understanding presents scalable pricing models aligned with increased functionality, potentially leading to higher ROI over time, emphasizing long-term strategic benefits in automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Ephesoft Transact vs. UiPath Document Understanding Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Ephesoft Transact vs. UiPath Document Understanding

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Ephesoft Transact

Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Document Understanding

Ranking in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)

2nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) category, the mindshare of Ephesoft Transact is 1.9%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Document Understanding is 12.5%, down from 13.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)

Featured Reviews

Yogesh Shendage

OCR Developer at Hexaware Technologies

A stable and scalable smart content acquisition and data classification solution with a useful inject feature

I would advise potential users that Ephesoft Transact is an easy tool to handle. The UI isn't complex, and even if everything isn't handled at the UI level, they can work with the script. You can also handle issues with scripts. I believe Ephesoft Transact is one of the best tools because the UI is an easy one. The UI-level design makes it easy to handle the development and the superior Ephesoft support system. They will give you quick support to resolve issues and provide training materials. They will train the developer, and after training the developers, they will also support them. That's a good good thing that I saw. Initially, when I joined this project, I also had less knowledge. But with the help of this support system and the training material, I now have superior knowledge. On a scale from one to ten, I would give Ephesoft Transact a nine.

Read full review

Gangadhar Wali

Founder and COO at InVibes

Pre-trained models work well, but it is very expensive

We have to do manual validation for some of the things due to the OCR engine not being so accurate. For example, S is read as 5, 5 as S, 2 as Z, and Z as 2. In the case of currency, if one dot is missing, it gives a completely incorrect number. These discrepancies should be fixed because if the OCR itself doesn't work properly, then AI doesn't help with that. When AI is used for training models, the AI Center works precisely, but if the data itself is wrong, we can't do anything. If the extraction of data is proper, it definitely helps. However, 20% errors could be reduced if the OCR engine were better. In future updates, I would like to see better handling of issues such as when a dot is missing in currency, for example, with dollars, it should handle that automatically. It's very expensive. If the volume increases, we can't afford to use Document Understanding. We are thinking of moving to another solution because we are expecting 80,000 to 100,000 invoices.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Transact's best feature is its ease of customization."

"I have found the keyword extraction to be helpful."

"I like the inject feature. With desktop injects, we're doing all these things and extracting these things. Its stable, scalable, and technical support is good."

"The scalability it offers is truly exceptional, making it arguably the best in the market."

"One of the most valuable features is the intelligent recognition of the fields. The algorithm is able to recognize them based on the pattern. Also, the machine learning model enables you to use predefined solutions. The machine-learning capabilities of the solution are very cool."

"The highly visual and user-friendly interface was a standout feature."

"There are many features that can be added to the action center to keep humans in the loop to evaluate the accuracy of the extracted data."

"It has advanced capabilities compared to other competitors, whether Blue Prism or Automation Anywhere."

"Has a very good machine learning feature."

"I believe the most valuable feature is the prebuilt algorithm for extracting information from foreign invoices."

"The taxonomy and Validation Station are among the most helpful features for us. If anything is extracted incorrectly, we can manually extract it there."

Cons

"Their email service and extraction could be better. We get the input via email, and these emails contain different types of documents like Excel, PDF, or they may contain different content in the email body. Due to this variation, sometimes the email service crashes, and emails aren't redirected to Ephesoft Transact. Ephesoft has provided us with new hotfixes. Whatever flaws we found in the 2019.2 version, they have already updated it in the new version, 20.1.05, and it's already released. Drawbacks like not capturing the handwritten fields are now sorted."

"It's not easy to train."

"Transact could be improved by removing Java and making its pricing more accessible for smaller customers."

"The extraction can be better. ABBYY FlexiCapture has more capabilities than Document Understanding. It can also extract automatically without training, whereas with Document Understanding, we need to train everything."

"The extraction and classification process should be simplified."

"Its pricing can be improved."

"I would like to see more integration of artificial intelligence. That's being implemented, but it would be a massive improvement to the solution's document processing. If UiPath achieves intelligent document processing, it will be far better than anything on the market. There are currently some limitations with the fields that could be addressed using a GPT engine. With an integrated AI model, you wouldn't need to create your taxonomy. You would only need to provide some prompts, such as "What is the property name?" It will store that as a variable."

"There are also problems with handwritten documents. The results from those are not 90 percent accurate. With scanned and native PDFs, it is 90 to 99 percent accurate, but the accuracy of handwritten documents is somewhat less. If they could improve on that, it would also be helpful."

"Document Understanding would be improved with more AI platforms."

"Existing models have room for improvement."

"UiPath Document Understanding can improve its handwriting and signature recognition."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Transact's pricing could be better for smaller customers."

"Initially, when I got a licensed copy of Ephesoft Transact, it was for one year. After one year, we had to send an email to the Ephesoft team informing them that our license was going to expire. They updated it and provided one license in our file, and we had to update and install the folder. They have versions for one year and lifelong as well."

"UiPath has a higher upfront cost, but its Document Understanding feature is not a significant additional expense compared to the overall platform."

"For the licensing part, in our company, we initially started off with a monthly plan, but yearly plans are also there. Cost-wise, UiPath Document Understanding is good since it provides flexibility in its pricing."

"The cost per license is significant, approaching ten thousand dollars."

"UiPath Document Understanding offers fair pricing, primarily if you consider the number of resources and human work the solution reduces, plus the ROI you can get from it."

"On a scale of one to ten with ten being the most expensive, I rate UiPath Document Understanding an eight on cost."

"The price is on the high end."

"I used the community version, so there was no fee."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution a nine."

More UiPath Document Understanding pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Retailer

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about UiPath Document Understanding?

The solution allows us to continue with vendors whose information comes in correctly and to stop the automation for vendors with many items that are not clearly defined.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Document Understanding?

It is expensive. The license cost for UiPath Studio has risen to around 3.5 lakhs last year, and I am uncertain how much the increase will be this year. They have also increased the bot prices. The...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Document Understanding?

See all answers

Comparisons

Tungsten TotalAgility vs Ephesoft Transact

Compared 61% of the time

Tungsten RPA vs Ephesoft Transact

Compared 39% of the time

More Ephesoft Transact Competitors

ABBYY Vantage vs UiPath Document Understanding

Compared 22% of the time

Tungsten TotalAgility vs UiPath Document Understanding

Compared 20% of the time

Amazon Textract vs UiPath Document Understanding

Compared 15% of the time

Instabase vs UiPath Document Understanding

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Capture vs UiPath Document Understanding

Compared 8% of the time

More UiPath Document Understanding Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Intelligent Document Processing (IDP)

May 2025

Download Ephesoft Transact product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Document Understanding

May 2025

Download UiPath Document Understanding product report

Overview

Ephesoft provides intelligent document processing solutions with industry-leading technology to help enterprises maximize their productivity. Using AI and patented machine learning technology, Ephesoft’s platform captures data from documents, enriches it with context and amplifies the power of that data, adding intelligence to accelerate any business process and drive successful digital transformation. Once the data is unlocked, Ephesoft classifies it and easily export the data into any ERP, Content Services, RPA, Workflow or other repository.

Customers who have a high volume of valuable documents like invoices, records, contracts, mail, claims or loans, can benefit by accelerating and streamlining processes, eliminating manual data entry and boosting productivity. It’s time to automate your processes and get work done faster.

Ephesoft

UiPath Document Understanding is employed across industries for extracting data from documents like invoices and legal papers, automating processes, reducing manual input, and enhancing accuracy. It manages both structured and unstructured data with OCR and machine learning capabilities.

UiPath Document Understanding enhances data extraction by supporting numerous document formats and languages. Its capabilities range from processing invoices in finance to handling medical documents in healthcare. By integrating with systems such as SAP, it streamlines document classification and validation. The incorporation of OCR and machine learning allows for high accuracy, even with scanned and handwritten documents, while also enabling automation of tasks that formerly required significant manual intervention.

What are the key features of UiPath Document Understanding?

Machine Learning: Elevates data accuracy through AI-driven models.
OCR Capabilities: Optimizes extraction across multiple formats and languages.
Integration Flexibility: Connects with systems like SAP effectively.
Action Centers and Validation Stations: Facilitates user involvement in validations.
Pre-Built Algorithms: Improves efficiency, especially in invoice processing.

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

Manual Labor Reduction: Minimizes human input and related errors.
Accuracy Improvement: Increases precision in data extraction.
Flexibility: Adapts to a range of document types and formats.
Efficiency Boost: Speeds up processing times and reduces delays.

Across industries, companies use UiPath Document Understanding for automating document processing tasks. In finance, it handles invoice processing, while in healthcare it manages medical record extraction. In manufacturing, it streamlines document workflows, and in HR, it facilitates the handling of internal documents. Despite its advantages, users report challenges with handwriting accuracy, template diversity, and integration complexity. Enhancements in AI and OCR are desired to improve scanning and extraction from diverse languages and formats.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Honda Logistics, Washington State Health Care Authority

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Ephesoft Transact vs. UiPath Document Understanding

June 2025

Free Report: Ephesoft Transact vs. UiPath Document Understanding

Find out what your peers are saying about Ephesoft Transact vs. UiPath Document Understanding and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Ephesoft Transact vs. UiPath Document Understanding report.

See our list of best Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) vendors.

We monitor all Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.