We performed a comparison between Ephesoft Transact and UiPath Document Understanding based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the inject feature. With desktop injects, we're doing all these things and extracting these things. Its stable, scalable, and technical support is good."
"I have found the keyword extraction to be helpful."
"Transact's best feature is its ease of customization."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The solution's technical support is good."
"UiPath Document Understanding offers multiple types of extractors, which we can use to extract information from documents in a variety of ways."
"The best feature is pre-labeling, as it eliminates the need to manually label each data point."
"The entity-level extraction is very good. The workflow is also very good."
"I believe the most valuable feature is the prebuilt algorithm for extracting information from foreign invoices."
"UiPath enables us to automate manual tasks and duplicate them easily. The processes are highly accurate."
"The most valuable feature is key-value pair and table extraction."
"The scalability it offers is truly exceptional, making it arguably the best in the market."
"Their email service and extraction could be better. We get the input via email, and these emails contain different types of documents like Excel, PDF, or they may contain different content in the email body. Due to this variation, sometimes the email service crashes, and emails aren't redirected to Ephesoft Transact. Ephesoft has provided us with new hotfixes. Whatever flaws we found in the 2019.2 version, they have already updated it in the new version, 20.1.05, and it's already released. Drawbacks like not capturing the handwritten fields are now sorted."
"It's not easy to train."
"Transact could be improved by removing Java and making its pricing more accessible for smaller customers."
"An area for improvement in UiPath Document Understanding is data extraction from scanned documents. It could be better because I've observed a ten percent failure or flaw whenever the vendor scans and converts documents into PDFs."
"UiPath Document Understanding could be more user-friendly."
"One area of improvement for UiPath Document Understanding is the accuracy of handwritten documents. While the solution supports handwritten documents, the accuracy percentage is not as high as desired."
"At times, the scanning functionality of the tool may fail to generate accurate output, resulting in the need for manual input."
"UiPath could improve its analytics and interface."
"The documentation should be more clear, or better training should be provided."
"UiPath Document Understanding requires more database connectors."
"The solution must localize the built-in features for supporting Arabic scripts so we do not rely on third-party tools."
More UiPath Document Understanding Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ephesoft Transact is ranked 12th in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 3 reviews while UiPath Document Understanding is ranked 3rd in Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) with 45 reviews. Ephesoft Transact is rated 7.6, while UiPath Document Understanding is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Ephesoft Transact writes "A stable and scalable smart content acquisition and data classification solution with a useful inject feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath Document Understanding writes "Is easy to configure, user-friendly, and produces accurate results". Ephesoft Transact is most compared with ABBYY Vantage, whereas UiPath Document Understanding is most compared with ABBYY Vantage, Instabase, Tungsten TotalAgility, Nanonets and IQ Bot. See our Ephesoft Transact vs. UiPath Document Understanding report.
See our list of best Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) vendors.
We monitor all Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
