We performed a comparison between Elastic Security and Graylog based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Elastic Security is commended for its adaptability, extensive customization options, and seamless integration with the ELK Stack. Graylog stands out with its exceptional search functions, seamless integration with Elasticsearch, and real-time data access. Elastic Security could improve by reducing resource usage, automating threat response, and simplifying the user experience. Graylog could benefit from additional customization options and an improved rule-creation process.
Service and Support: Some Elastic Security users found their support helpful, while others experienced difficulties and delays. Graylog's customer service is generally well-regarded, with reviewers noting effective solutions and satisfactory experiences. While response times may differ, Graylog's support is considered superior compared to that of other products.
Ease of Deployment: Elastic Security generally has a straightforward setup but may require trained specialists. Some Graylog users said the setup was easy. Other reviewers faced challenges, but these were easily resolved with help from the vendor’s support staff. Graylog is easier to set up in smaller environments, but it could get complicated in large clusters.
Pricing: Elastic Security is considered affordable and cost-effective, with pricing based on the size of the monitored environment. Graylog offers an enterprise edition and an open-source option with a daily capacity restriction. Some users said that data costs can be expensive.
ROI: Elastic Security has shown mixed results in terms of ROI, with some users expressing concerns about the quality of their premium support. Graylog can offer some cost savings. The precise ROI may vary depending on the organization’s size and use case.
"ELK is open-source, and it will give you the framework you need to build everything from scratch."
"Elastic is straightforward, easy to integrate, and highly customizable."
"We like Elastic Security because it's a REST API-based solution. That's the primary reason we use it."
"The most valuable features of the solution are the prevention methods and the incident alerts."
"The solution is quite stable. The performance has been good."
"It's open-source and free to use."
"We've found the initial setup to be quite straightforward."
"We chose the product based on the ability to scan for malware using a malware behavioral model as opposed to just a traditional hash-based antivirus. Therefore, it's not as intensive."
"Message forwarding through the in-built module."
"Everything stands out as valuable, including the fact that I can quantify and qualify the logs, create pipelines and process the logs in any way I like, and create charts or data maps."
"It is used as a log manager/SIEM. It provides visibility into the infrastructure and security related events."
"The build is stable and requires little maintenance, even compared to some extremely expensive products."
"One of the most valuable features is that you are able to do a very detailed search through the log messages in the overview."
"I am very proud of how very stable the solution is."
"We run a containerized microservices environment. Being able to set up streams and search for errors and anomalies across hundreds of containers is why a log aggregation platform like Graylog is valuable to us."
"I like the correlation and the alerting."
"Improvements in Elastic Security could include refining and normalizing queries to make them more user-friendly, enhancing the user experience with better documentation, and addressing any latency issues."
"It's a little bit of a learning curve to understand the logic of searching for things and trying to find what you're looking for in Elastic Security."
"The solution does not have a UI and this is one of the reasons we are looking for another solution."
"This solution cannot do predictive maintenance, so we have to build our own modules for doing it."
"Elastic Security could improve the documentation. It would help if they were more simple and clean."
"Technical support could respond faster."
"Anything that supports high availability or ease of deployment in a highly available environment would help to improve this solution."
"The solution could offer better reporting features."
"I would like to see a default dashboard widget that shows the topology of the clusters defined for the graylog install."
"Graylog needs to improve their authentication. Also, the fact that Graylog displays logs from the top down is just ridiculous."
"Elasticsearch recommendations for tuning could be better. Graylog doesn't have direct support for running the system inside of Kubernetes, so it can be challenging to fill in the gaps and set up containers in a way that is both performant and stable."
"More customization is always useful."
"We ran into problems with Elasticsearch throwing a circuit-breaking exception due to field data size being too large. It turned out that the heap size directly impacted this size in a high-throughput environment, causing unexplained instability in Graylog. We were able to troubleshoot on the Elasticsearch size, but we should have been able to reference some minimum requirements for Graylog to know that our settings weren't sufficient."
"Graylog can improve the index rotation as it's quite a complex solution."
"Lacks sufficient documentation."
"Graylog could improve the process of creating rules. We have to create them manually by doing parses and applying them. Other SIEM solutions have basic rules and you can create and get more events of interest."
Elastic Security is ranked 5th in Log Management with 58 reviews while Graylog is ranked 11th in Log Management with 18 reviews. Elastic Security is rated 7.6, while Graylog is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Elastic Security writes "A stable and scalable tool that provides visibility along with the consolidation of logs to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Graylog writes "Great detailed search features and easy Java integration, but needs improvement in integration with Python". Elastic Security is most compared with Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel, IBM Security QRadar and VMware Aria Operations for Logs, whereas Graylog is most compared with Grafana Loki, Wazuh, syslog-ng, Splunk Enterprise Security and LogRhythm SIEM. See our Elastic Security vs. Graylog report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
