Elastic Security and SonicWall Capture Client are two renowned cybersecurity solutions. Users are generally more satisfied with the pricing and support of Elastic Security, whereas SonicWall Capture Client is often preferred for its comprehensive features.
Features: Elastic Security is praised for its extensive integrations, scalability, and competitive pricing. SonicWall Capture Client shines with advanced threat protection, endpoint detection capabilities, and robust feature set. SonicWall Capture Client’s threat detection is highlighted as superior.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest Elastic Security could enhance its threat hunting tools, streamline configuration, and improve user interface. SonicWall Capture Client users desire better reporting tools, improved usability in complex environments, and enhanced customer service integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Security is valued for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. SonicWall Capture Client also offers a smooth deployment process but has mixed reviews on customer service response times.
Pricing and ROI: Elastic Security has competitive setup costs and users report favorable ROI. SonicWall Capture Client may have higher upfront costs, but users feel the robust features justify the investment over time, providing a potentially higher long-term return.
It does not require hefty security budgets and can be deployed for enterprise security effectively.
Most of the time when my team encounters issues, they receive responses within 24 hours.
Support is prompt and helpful.
Partners can purchase single endpoints at prices equivalent to 1,000-endpoint deals, providing an advantage for managed security service provider partners.
While their escalation process is understandable, it can be time-consuming as all logs need to be provided multiple times across different service levels.
It allows us to think about specific use cases, such as gathering malicious IPs in a single view and analyzing threats based on geolocation.
There are no restrictions on the scalability of SonicWall Capture Client.
SonicWall Capture Client is accessed via cloud-based management console.
The installation process is straightforward, requiring only five pilot installations to enable customers to complete the remaining installations independently.
In terms of stability, I would rate Elastic a solid eight out of ten.
CrowdStrike and Defender have more established threat intelligence integration due to having a larger client base.
My security testing team continuously reports vulnerabilities, and we have to fix and update the versions frequently.
Elastic Security consumes a lot of resources, requiring a substantial deployment setup.
One of the drawbacks is that I cannot use Advanced and Premier licenses within a single tenant, which can be problematic when users need to deploy different licenses.
A significant limitation is that SonicWall Capture Client cannot be installed on smartphones, as there is no mobile version available.
XDR cannot be used unless MDR services are purchased with SonicWall.
This is beneficial for SMEs as they do not need extensive budgets for security solutions.
The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building their security infrastructure.
Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels.
SonicWall Capture Client offers a cost-effective solution that's cheaper compared to other vendors like CrowdStrike.
The platform provides more visibility and requires less effort in monitoring.
Elastic Security offers good insight regarding alerts, reports, and cases.
We require rapid processing speed for alerts and event data, and Elastic Security is very efficient at handling this level of data.
Machine learning is particularly effective due to SonicWall sandboxing's threat intelligence database of approximately 7.1 billion entries.
One is that users can use the sandbox of SonicWall, which is called Capture ATP for free.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Elastic Security | 2.4% |
| SonicWall Capture Client | 0.6% |
| Other | 97.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 40 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.
Additional offerings and benefits:
Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.
SonicWall Capture Client is a unified client platform that delivers multiple endpoint protection capabilities, including next-generation malware protection and application vulnerability intelligence. It leverages cloud sandbox file testing, comprehensive reporting, and enforcement for endpoint protection.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
