

Elastic Search and Zapier compete in the software solutions category, with Elastic Search providing robust log monitoring and Zapier excelling in integration capabilities. Elastic Search holds the upper hand in scalability and flexibility, while Zapier leads in ease of integration without coding.
Features: Elastic Search provides robust log monitoring and data aggregation, comprehensive search and analysis features, as well as flexibility and scalability through its open-source nature. Zapier is renowned for seamless integration capabilities, connecting various applications effortlessly, and offering a vast library of "Zaps" to automate workflows for increased productivity.
Room for Improvement: Elastic Search could improve its security features and resilience, along with enhancing the user interface within Kibana. Its complex setup and maintenance, alongside limited alerting options in the open-source version, necessitate improvements. Zapier's error reporting UI and lead management capabilities could be enhanced, while expanding integration options remains crucial. Both offerings face pricing concerns, with Elastic Search's model causing confusion and Zapier's costs escalating rapidly with increased usage.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Elastic Search primarily supports on-premise deployments, providing full control but requiring significant technical expertise. Zapier's cloud-based deployment eases setup and maintenance, although data residency can be a challenge. Elastic Search benefits from a strong community support, though vendor support can be slow. Zapier's support is less responsive, necessitating faster resolution for immediate issues.
Pricing and ROI: Elastic Search offers initial cost savings with its open-source solution, yet enterprise features lead to higher expenses in large deployments. Its ROI is driven by reduced time to market and enhanced operational efficiency. Zapier offers a free tier for testing but scales quickly in cost with usage, offering substantial ROI for companies leveraging its automation capabilities.
We have not purchased any licensed products, and our use of Elastic Search is purely open-source, contributing positively to our ROI.
It is stable, and we do not encounter critical issues like server downtime, which could result in data loss.
The main benefits observed from using Elastic Search include improvements in operational efficiency, along with cost, time, and resource savings.
In a scenario where employing three resources for three months might cost approximately $18,000 to $20,000, Zapier provides substantial cost savings.
The customer support for Elastic Search is one of the best I have ever tried.
They have always been really responsible and responsive to my requests.
It has been sufficient to visit conferences such as SCALE in Southern California Linux Expo, where Elastic Search has a booth to talk to their staff.
Their technical support is good; they respond promptly and are very helpful.
This can help if you need assistance, as you can communicate with the community and support system, and most issues are already resolved by AI.
The experience was positive with prompt responses from their team.
I would rate its scalability a ten.
Since we're on the cloud, whenever we need to upgrade or add resources, they handle everything.
We haven't encountered any problems so far, and there is the potential for auto-scaling.
Zapier is suitable for small or simpler automation but not for complex ones.
Scaling it gets quite expensive, and while I cannot evaluate it purely from a technology perspective, compared to Workato, I would give Zapier a seven for scalability.
The data transfer sometimes exceeded the bandwidth limits without proper notification, which caused issues.
The stability of Elasticsearch was very high.
When you put one keyword, everything related to that keyword in your ecosystem will showcase all the results.
In my current company, we had significant challenges with Zapier regarding maintenance, as Zaps were often broken, not necessarily due to Zapier, but due to changes in the input variables.
From a technical point of view, there are no significant issues recalled as Elastic Search has been absolutely awesome for this use case and covers 100% of the needs.
If I need to parse one million records saved into Elastic Search, it becomes a nightmare because I need to do the pagination, and it is very problematic in that regard.
Observability features like search latency, indexing rate, and maybe rejected requests should be added to make the platform more reliable and accessible for everyone.
The error message options in the dashboard should be improved. It should be user-friendly so that beginners or non-technical users can figure out the problems and solutions on their own.
You can build similar or dependent automations in one Zap, which helps with understanding the process without switching between different records.
Having flexibility in creating more complex automation would eliminate the need to transform data within the source or destination.
On the AWS side, it is very expensive because they charge based on query basis or how much data is transferred in and out, making it very expensive.
Having the hosted solution and not having to pay for essentially a DevOps person on staff to manage makes it affordable.
You can host it on-premises, which would incur zero cost, or take it as a SaaS-based service, where the expenses remain minimal.
The pricing is in accordance with market standards and even lower in some cases.
The pricing of Zapier is slightly higher compared to other market automation tools such as Pabbly, Make.com, and N8N, which have good features but are priced lower than Zapier.
Elastic Search makes handling large data volumes efficient and supports complex search operations.
The most valuable feature of Elasticsearch was the quick search capability, allowing us to search by any criteria needed.
The speed with which Elastic Search is able to search through all of the documents we place into it is quite remarkable, as we search through 65 billion documents in less than a second in most cases, on a constant consistent basis.
They have approximately 7,000 connections.
The automation capabilities are impressive.
Creating integration points through webhooks is particularly useful for anyone working on integration projects.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Elastic Search | 1.6% |
| Zapier | 2.5% |
| Other | 95.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 37 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 43 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
Elasticsearch is a prominent open-source search and analytics engine known for its scalability, reliability, and straightforward management. It's a favored choice among enterprises for real-time data search, analysis, and visualization. Open-source Elasticsearch is free, offering a comprehensive feature set and scalability. It allows full control over deployments but requires managing and maintaining the infrastructure. On the other hand, Elastic Cloud provides a managed service with features like automated provisioning, high availability, security, and global reach.
Elasticsearch excels in handling time-sensitive data and complex search requirements across large datasets. Its scalability allows it to handle growing data volumes efficiently, maintaining high performance and fast response times. Integrated with Kibana, Elasticsearch enables powerful data visualization, providing real-time insights crucial for data-driven decision-making.
Elastic Cloud reduces operational overhead and improves scalability and performance, though it comes with associated costs. It is available on your preferred cloud provider — AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud. Customers who want to manage the software themselves, whether on public, private, or hybrid cloud, can download the Elastic Stack.
At its core, Elasticsearch is renowned for its full-text search capabilities, capable of performing complex queries and supporting features like fuzzy matching and auto-complete.
Peer reviews from various professionals highlight its strengths and weaknesses. Pros include its detection and correlation features, flexibility, cloud-readiness, extensibility, and efficient search capabilities. However, users have noted challenges like steep learning curves, data analysis limitations, and integration complexities. The platform is generally viewed as stable and scalable, with varying degrees of satisfaction regarding its usability and feature set.
In summary, Elasticsearch stands out for its high-speed search, scalability, and versatile analytics, making it a go-to solution for organizations managing large datasets. Its adaptability to different enterprise needs, robust community support, and continuous development keep it at the forefront of enterprise search and analytics solutions. However, potential users should be aware of its learning curve and the need for skilled personnel for optimization.
Zapier connects thousands of apps, enabling seamless automation without coding. It supports webhooks, multi-step tasks, and a wide array of integrations. Despite needing enhancements in Google Sheets capabilities, API limits, and UI, it remains a tool for boosting productivity across many sectors.
By linking tools such as Google Sheets, HubSpot, Slack, and Salesforce, Zapier allows users to automate workflows without coding expertise. Its integrations serve logistics operations, CRM, and social media management. Users can process tracking exceptions and streamline operations with third-party software like QuickBooks, Zoho, and Power BI. Although users suggest features like better Google Sheets handling and improved collaboration tools, Zapier continues to provide expansive automation, enhancing efficiency and facilitating new opportunities through integrations.
What Features Stand Out in Zapier?In logistics, Zapier enhances operations by automating exception tracking and third-party software integration. Its use in CRM and social media streamlines lead creation and workflow automation. Users from diverse industries leverage its extensive connectivity to support intelligence management, generate analytical insights, and execute cross-functional tasks efficiently.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.