Eggplant Test vs TestObject comparison

The compared Keysight Technologies and Sauce Labs solutions aren't in the same category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #12 in TAt , with an average rating of 7.3, and holds a 4.0% mindshare in the category. Sauce Labs is ranked #14 in MTT , and holds a 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sauce Labs users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

3,466 Views
2,253 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

TestObject

Read 1 TestObject review

135 Views
132 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

TestObject

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Eggplant Test and TestObject based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, UiPath, OpenText and others in Test Automation Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: October 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

October 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 871,358 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (9th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th), Test Automation Tools (12th)

TestObject

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (14th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Eggplant Test is designed for Test Automation Tools and holds a mindshare of 4.0%, up 3.5% compared to last year.
TestObject, on the other hand, focuses on Mobile App Testing Tools, holds 1.4% mindshare, up 0.3% since last year.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Eggplant Test	4.0%
Tricentis Tosca	20.4%
OpenText Functional Testing	8.7%
Other	66.9%

Test Automation Tools

Mobile App Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
TestObject	1.4%
Tricentis Tosca	32.9%
OpenText Functional Testing	20.5%
Other	45.2%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

RajeevSAwant

Head Automation CoE at Truglobal

Low-code testing platform used for API and visual testing as well as AI-based scriptless automation

This solution is very easy to use and this is one of the solutions best features. It has integrated seamlessly with our framework and provides very wide coverage. It offers very comprehensive reporting and allows us to drill down to the various levels of the automation and respective application performance. What TestObject provides is not available from other service providers. The kind of detailed reporting provided is very good.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is a stable one."

"The biggest advantage has been the ability to improve the quality significantly."

"The main feature of Eggplant Test is that it can do fully automated web testing and app testing."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create code from a flow chart, and then run the code through it."

"Everything is happening on the layout or display that is used by the user. Eggplant prompts processes, like 'click here,' or 'look for this image.' Eggplant makes it possible for QA people and BAs, working in the actual display, to check if the software is providing the right images, the right text, and the right results. They don't have to go inside the code or to the TCP/IP layer. Everything is happening at the highest level."

"It is easy to set up."

"The most valuable features of Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence are bug hunting and OCR technology."

"The solution is based on a Windows model, where adding users is just a few clicks. It is easy to manage users and add them."

More Eggplant Test pros

"TestObject have released new capabilities that have helped us to provide a comprehensive solution to our end customers. Customers do not need to provide upfront investment in mobile devices as these are pretty costly."

Cons

"Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price."

"Eggplant Test should emphasize on improving its offering in non-Windows environments."

"The language is too specific; it is just for Eggplant."

"If one area could be improved, it would be some of their documentation. In particular, some of their online help and user support documentation is a little bit out of date and could be revised and updated on a more frequent basis. Other than that, I haven't really found any issues or problems."

"There was no free trial in it."

"A step forward would be to have event support, because it is more or less linear at the moment."

"Eggplant Test is not a stable solution at all in my experience."

"The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture."

More Eggplant Test cons

"In a future release, we would like to have the ARML model included."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

871,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 18% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 13% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 11% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Eggplant Test

Compared 8% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs TestObject

Compared 100% of the time

More TestObject Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

October 2025

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

September 2025

Download TestObject product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

No data available

Overview

Across every industry, digital transformation is top of mind. New methods of developing software are driving fast change, and test teams are feeling the pressure. Increasing demand to release faster while maintaining the highest levels of quality is making the testing process more complex and harder to scale.

With AI-powered testing, Eggplant’s test and automation intelligence delivers the coverage you need to optimize the user experience, speed up release cycles, and improve your quality assurance process. Discover a fast, secure, and easy-to-use solution that tests any kind of software on any platform or device.

Keysight Technologies

Everyone hates bugs. That’s why TestObject – an in-the-cloud, all-you-need testing tool – was founded in 2012. App quality has a major impact on your apps’ success but massive fragmentation of operating systems and mobile devices makes it hard for developers to test and guarantee the functionality of apps under different conditions. This is where TestObject comes to play. The company from Brandenburg, Germany provides a cloud platform with numerous real Android and iOS devices, accessible directly from your browser. Developers can upload their apps onto devices and see if and how they work. Along with the devices TestObject provides several testing tools to check the app’s functionality from all angles. Test more, worry less.

Sauce Labs

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

BW Bank, Telefonica

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

October 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, UiPath, OpenText and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: October 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

871,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.