We performed a comparison between EDB Postgres Advanced Server and MongoDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Open Source Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like that EDB Postgres Advanced Server scales well. A valuable feature of the solution is multi-tenancy support. It also supports JSONB."
"The low cost and functionality allows us to save money on smaller database projects."
"It gives us a solid, less expensive alternative to deploying with Oracle."
"I rate EDB Postgres Advanced Server's stability an eight out of ten."
"It's super easy to develop a couple of solutions for clients with MongoDB, like a quick web page with no clear data structure that they need to spin up quickly to validate some sort of MDTP."
"It is really a pretty easy product to use. It's very reliable, it's proven."
"MongoDB is flexible and it allows other applications to be added."
"The most valuable features of MongoDB are we have a lot of documentation and SQL-based applications that run on it."
"Its flexibility, and cost. It is reasonably priced."
"My impression is that the initial setup is straightforward."
"Sharding is an excellent feature of MongoDB."
"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Overall, MongoDB has helped manage and analyze attachment data."
"I have faced performance issues in the community edition."
"The security is not very robust and the product would be much more useful with more security options."
"The system is aging and not keeping up with the performance of new, enhanced database models."
"An area for improvement in EDB Postgres Advanced Server is JSONB querying. It would be nice to have even stronger JSONB support from the solution."
"There can be stability issues."
"The solution should more easily integrate with custom code."
"The solution could have more integration."
"I suppose it could be a little more secure."
"It should have GUI for managing clusters. MongoDB needs a more powerful GUI to manage clusters and make switchovers. Currently, there is no good, free tool to check the replication to find out if there is a gap."
"I'd like to see an ID generator. It's very technical but I don't think it has one, so we have to go to great lengths to work around that."
"They could provide more documentation and examples for adding pipeline stages."
"I think it would be good to have more search options such as an index resource. This will provide more options and resources to do advance searches."
EDB Postgres Advanced Server is ranked 6th in Open Source Databases with 6 reviews while MongoDB is ranked 5th in Open Source Databases with 69 reviews. EDB Postgres Advanced Server is rated 8.0, while MongoDB is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of EDB Postgres Advanced Server writes "Scales well; works in both development and production environments and has multi-tenancy and JSONB support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MongoDB writes "Lightweight with good flexibility and very fast performance for searching data". EDB Postgres Advanced Server is most compared with PostgreSQL, Percona Server, MySQL, YugabyteDB and MariaDB, whereas MongoDB is most compared with InfluxDB, Couchbase, ScyllaDB, Cassandra and Oracle NoSQL. See our EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. MongoDB report.
See our list of best Open Source Databases vendors.
We monitor all Open Source Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
