Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

DX Performance Management vs Plixer Scrutinizer comparison

Broadcom and Plixer are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #43 with an average rating of 9.0, while Plixer is ranked #72. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Plixer’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Plixer users who would recommend it.
DX Performance Management
Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews
  • 1,400 Views
  • 1,064 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
Plixer Scrutinizer
Read 15 Plixer Scrutinizer reviews
  • 1,775 Views
  • 1,331 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX Performance Management and Plixer Scrutinizer are competing products in the network monitoring and performance insights category. Plixer Scrutinizer has the upper hand due to its superior feature set and analytics capabilities.

Features: DX Performance Management provides robust network performance monitoring, real-time diagnostics, and is designed for scalability and ease of use. Plixer Scrutinizer offers advanced analytics, detailed flow data visualization, and comprehensive reporting capabilities, focusing on in-depth network analysis.

Room for Improvement: DX Performance Management could enhance its analytics capabilities, improve its reporting features, and expand its visualization tools. Plixer Scrutinizer may benefit from simplifying its deployment process, offering more cost-effective pricing, and expanding its customer support options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Performance Management offers a straightforward deployment process and extensive customer support, focusing on rapid setup and efficient issue resolution. Plixer Scrutinizer has a more complex deployment due to advanced features but provides dedicated expert support for setup and ongoing management.

Pricing and ROI: DX Performance Management is more affordable with a quicker ROI due to lower costs and faster implementation. Plixer Scrutinizer requires a higher initial investment but promises long-term ROI with its comprehensive analytics capabilities and potential for reducing network issues.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed DX Performance Management vs. Plixer Scrutinizer Report (Updated: February 2026).
Buyer's Guide
DX Performance Management vs. Plixer Scrutinizer
February 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

DX Performance Management
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
43rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure Capacity Planning (1st), DX NetOps (2nd)
Plixer Scrutinizer
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
72nd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Performance Management is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Plixer Scrutinizer is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
DX Performance Management0.5%
Plixer Scrutinizer0.5%
Other99.0%
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer1810893 - PeerSpot reviewer
reviewer1810893
Senior IT Operations Specialist at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Flexibility and detailed performance stats enable effective network monitoring
Spectrum is very good at monitoring all network faults and configurations. It enables me to take action based on network issues. The Performance Management provides detailed network performance stats, including CPU, memory, and interface bandwidth. Additionally, Spectrum is flexible and allows me to organize and treat devices uniquely without impacting other devices.
Read full review
Ira Mulyanti - PeerSpot reviewer
Ira Mulyanti
Sales Director at ARGA SOLUSI
An affordable product with great integration capabilities
Plixer Core Platform is a valuable feature and a good software. Plixer Scrutinizer uses NetFlow analysis to monitor whatever is there in a network. Price-wise, Plixer Scrutinizer is not an expensive product. Basically, Plixer Scrutinizer is an affordable product. Plixer Scrutinizer is a tool that allows for customization, especially in scenarios where customers need new product features. Plixer Scrutinizer is a tool that can integrate with any other brand or product in the market, so it is not an area of concern.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It can be easily integrated with other systems and is powerful enough to collect data from a large number of devices."
"Great dashboards and good integration with other solutions."
"One of the most valuable features is the ease of use."
"It is the gathering of the whole performance data in our environment and our network environment, for us and our customers."
"It is very easy to add devices; just be aware that it requires SNMP to be enabled."
"What is most useful is visibility."
"My sales representative, I would not trade him in for the world. He has done a really good job. I am really happy with him.​"
"I can get it to run a report showing, for instance, what root drives are in the critical range in terms of being full, like 90 percent full, and disseminate that information to the other areas of the organization."
More DX Performance Management pros
"The most valuable features of the solution are the ability to track what a device is doing and to go back historically. It is also able to go down to, and identify, very low levels of traffic."
"We didn't experience any bugs."
"It shows us the saturation of the network of devices. It gives us a clear view of the flows in the network to understand, for instance, planning upgrades in the network to get an idea of what's going on the network on traffic flows. It gives us insight, for instance, on what's going on on our VPN Client. There are a lot of things where it provides very helpful information. It also gives us our security reports with quite detailed information on what's going on in the network, and whether there are data exfiltrations and so on."
"The most valuable features of Plixer Scrutinizer are its ease of use, accessibility, and UI."
"The ability to view the status of the top-10 at a glance is helpful. We immediately know which link is over-utilized or heavily used... and it's all in real-time."
"The reporting and generating troubleshooting reports would be the best feature; our host-to-host conversation reporting."
"Visualization of the network traffic is the most valuable feature. It allows you to drill into information quite quickly."
"One feature I found most valuable in Plixer Scrutinizer is the very extensive reporting. Reporting is very flexible, though sometimes you need a little bit of support from Plixer Scrutinizer to create custom-made reporting in a very short time. Reporting is a very strong feature of the product."
More Plixer Scrutinizer pros
 

Cons

"The solution could improve the database model. It is also not very good because they have a lot of interconnections with other data sources, such as NFA and VNA."
"It could be a little easier to integrate new metrics."
"Even though we can see when something is not available, it would also be it would be nice if some sort of alerting took place to that you could know immediately if something went down."
"The quantity of views which are tied to specific metric families is too high. Also, the problem is the view doesn't tell you which metric family it uses, so you don't know why you don't see data."
"Policies could be improved."
"I'm not a fan of many extra features since they usually burden the software and reduce its reliability."
"It seems like we escalate more than I would like to. If anything, they should look at how the tier support goes in place."
"I would like to have more tasks, graphs, and possibilities for linking to the graphs and reports added to the solution."
More DX Performance Management cons
"Data retention needs improvement. Data retention is a thing where we are looking for a better way to collect flow data for a longer time to do forensic research on security incidents. By default, data retention is quite low. We need detailed data in safe storage for a longer time, e.g., for a couple of months. An improvement would be a way to export data into a secure long-term storage."
"The reporting structure, the front-end GUI, also needs some work. It needs some getting used to. It works fairly well, but it's a technical tool rather than a user tool. You have to understand the structure of the databases before you can really use it."
"It would be useful if there was a way to back up the configuration information. E.g., if you wanted to deploy a new instance or disaster recovery, you could quite easily deploy and restore the config, as opposed to having to restore all the NetFlow data. If there was just a button that said "backup config information", that would be good."
"There was a price lift because previously the product was privately owned, and now there is some external capital in the organization, so pricing could be lower, though, for Plixer Scrutinizer, there is almost no competition at this price point."
"We couldn't get it set up properly."
"I wish the reporting side was easier to work with, but it does a decent job. I also wish the reporting side was a little more intuitive or they offered more reporting examples."
"Knowing that they're coming out with a new user interface, that is an area where there is room for improvement. There are so many variables. They should limit the variables in the user interface and create some classes, like "simple," "novice," and "expert" to narrow down the variables within it."
"From what I understand it is that the solution is not very scalable in a high volume traffic environment with a large number of flows."
More Plixer Scrutinizer cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."
"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. ​"
"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."
"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."
"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."
"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."
"The licensing cost for Plixer Scrutinizer is in the middle. It's not the cheapest, but it's not the most expensive. Its licensing model is based on how many exporters, how many devices export information to the system. Plixer Scrutinizer has different modules you could add such as the security module which would cost extra."
"We just renewed. The pricing is 5,000 euro per year. This is the final price. All tax (20 percent) is included."
"It's about €10,000 a year for initial license and yearly maintenance costs. In addition, the hardware costs are about €10,000 once every five years."
"There are no extra costs. It's about $8,000 a year. The bang for the buck (cost) is definitely a plus."
"The license is per device. We have 50 devices."
"We have increased the license over time. We have added more licenses as the network has grown."
"I rate Plixer Scrutinizer's price a three on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price or affordable, and ten is high price or expensive."
"Compared to some of the other tools we have, it's incredibly reasonably priced."
More Plixer Scrutinizer pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Marketing Services Firm
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Large Enterprise25
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?
Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for DX Performance Management?
I have used Spectrum for monitoring all network faults, configurations, and troubleshooting network issues. It provides network performance stats, such as CPU, memory, and interface bandwidth detai...
See all answers
What advice do you have for others considering DX Performance Management?
I would recommend this solution based on its functionality, flexibility, customizability, and ease of use. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I am just a customer and not a par...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management
Compared 8% of the time
Datadog vs DX Performance Management Logo
Datadog vs DX Performance Management
Compared 8% of the time
WhatsUp Gold vs DX Performance Management Logo
WhatsUp Gold vs DX Performance Management
Compared 8% of the time
Kentik vs DX Performance Management Logo
Kentik vs DX Performance Management
Compared 7% of the time
AppNeta by Broadcom vs DX Performance Management Logo
AppNeta by Broadcom vs DX Performance Management
Compared 6% of the time
More DX Performance Management Competitors
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs Plixer Scrutinizer
Compared 13% of the time
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs Plixer Scrutinizer
Compared 10% of the time
PRTG Network Monitor vs Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs Plixer Scrutinizer
Compared 10% of the time
LiveNX vs Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
LiveNX vs Plixer Scrutinizer
Compared 8% of the time
WhatsUp Gold vs Plixer Scrutinizer Logo
WhatsUp Gold vs Plixer Scrutinizer
Compared 8% of the time
More Plixer Scrutinizer Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
DX Performance Management
February 2026
DX Performance Management reportDownload DX Performance Management product report
Buyer's Guide
Plixer Scrutinizer
January 2026
Plixer Scrutinizer reportDownload Plixer Scrutinizer product report
 

Also Known As

CA Performance Management
No data available
 

Overview

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom

The Scrutinizer incident response system leverages network traffic analytics to provide active monitoring, visualization, and reporting of network and security incidents. The system quickly delivers the rich forensic data needed by IT professionals to support fast and efficient incident response.

Plixer
 

Sample Customers

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG 
Oxford Networks, Squaw Valley Ski Holdings, UltiSat, Wipro, West Aurora School District 129, SUNY Geneseo College, Bloomington Public Schools, First National Bank of Pennsylvania, Kitsap Credit Union, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County Houston Texas, Carilion Clinic, Banner Health, IDEXX Laboratories, Phibro Animal Health Corporation, Goodwill Industries, Parmalat, Armstrong Coal Company, Flybe, James Walker
Buyer's Guide
DX Performance Management vs. Plixer Scrutinizer
February 2026
Free Report: DX Performance Management vs. Plixer Scrutinizer
Find out what your peers are saying about DX Performance Management vs. Plixer Scrutinizer and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our DX Performance Management vs. Plixer Scrutinizer report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.