DX Performance Management vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI comparison

Broadcom and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #55 with an average rating of 8.5, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #44 with an average rating of 8.3. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

DX Performance Management

Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews

778 Views
451 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Read 4 HPE Aruba Networking UXI reviews

770 Views
708 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX Performance Management

HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between DX Performance Management and HPE Aruba Networking UXI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Performance Management vs. HPE Aruba Networking UXI Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. HPE Aruba Networking UXI

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,785 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Performance Management

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

55th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (2nd), DX NetOps (2nd)

HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

44th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (11th)

Featured Reviews

Sandip Kheni

Lead Developer at STL - Sterlite Technologies Limited

The vertical database loads faster than any other product available

We experience disconnections between the solutions own components. In the last five years, there have been many intermittent connection issues with the four components and we still don't know the reasons. The solution has issues when loading groups that have been created in the application interfaces. It would be nice to have a mobile application. In the current industry and technical word, the mobile phone is the only thing that is always in your hands. Other Broadcom products have mobile applications but the solution doesn't offer one. It would be great to view device parameters and view or download graphs from a mobile device.

Read full review

Fabricio Nonato

Solutions Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Provides seamless network setup and efficient management with potential for security integration improvement

Areas where the HPE Aruba Networking UXI can improve include the integration of SD-WAN and security in a single solution. Now, Aruba has developed an SD-WAN solution that is among the best, alongside WLAN. In Brazil, it's common to see many hospitals and government locations utilizing Aruba solutions. However, Fortinet is well-known here for combining SD-WAN with security in a single box, whereas Aruba and Cisco typically have separate solutions for each. This separation can be expensive for companies in Brazil as they have to acquire multiple boxes. Currently, around 50% of firewall sales in Latin America are from Fortinet, but I believe this trend is changing as Aruba develops its offerings.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to quickly do drag and drop customized reports for dashboards."

"The out-of-the-box dashboards are valuable, in terms of being able to visualize performance data in ways that we haven't in the past."

"It saves time having it all on one place, so you do not have to jump around from different tools and try to merge the data. It is already done for you."

"There is a good amount of vendor certification which comes with the product. That's all factory-loaded, no need to load any custom-made files. Most of the metrics are calibrated and captured from the devices based on the defaults available from vendor certification."

"You can create intelligent alerts so you have enough time to replace the router or interface before it's full. The same is applicable for CBQoS channels."

"There is another component of the tool called Network Flow Analysis. It gives us the ability to troubleshoot issues which do not appear right away."

"The solution's performance itself is very good because it is a vertical database that loads very fast in comparison to other products."

"The tool helps us understand network performance."

More DX Performance Management pros

"The performance, elasticity, and efficiency of Aruba products have been exceptional."

"Aruba products have significantly improved our network reliability, as none of my teammates have logged a call to Aruba in the past year."

"The most valuable feature of HP Aruba Networking UX-I is its 24/7 monitoring capability."

Cons

"It could be a little easier to integrate new metrics."

"I have mixed feeling about the scalability. I feel like there are things which are being put into UIM right now that are not being included in Performance Center that we need to see in Performance Center. We are kind of being driven to buy UIM, and I can't justify it."

"It needs role-based administration."

"This may be available by now but for server space, when it comes to the disk file system, I'd like to see that graphically represented, or the trend, rather than what I'm seeing now."

"It would be helpful if CA provided online training for its customers."

"This tool gathers so much data, which makes it hard to convert over. To upgrade it, you really need the solution backed up. That is the issue that we are facing right now."

"We would like to be capable of reporting network performance with a report strictly focused on the times outside business hours, which CA PM does not currently support. We have discontinued the use of the Business Hours Filtering until CA engineers are able to resolve or offer guidance."

"There are some areas in the technology right now, like with VMs, where we are lacking with our abilities to get inside the VM to monitor traffic within the machine."

More DX Performance Management cons

"Some manual administrative tasks still need to be triggered manually, leading to lower efficiency."

"It would be beneficial if the tool offered a less expensive subscription as it is currently costly for our clients."

"Some manual administrative tasks still need to be triggered manually, leading to lower efficiency."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Educational Organization

11%

University

Insurance Company

41%

Healthcare Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about DX Performance Management?

The tool helps us understand network performance.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX Performance Management?

The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

With the pricing and setup cost and licensing for the HPE Aruba Networking UXI, it depends and varies. Many people use these for a short-term solution just to gather their information. Many leverag...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

They could improve their services. The AI-driven insights of the HPE Aruba UXI for optimizing network operations are pretty comprehensive. There is still room for improvement in that sense, but it ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

I have used the HPE Aruba Networking UXI more in complex types of environments, mainly in enterprise environments. I have used them extensively in healthcare industry where certain areas within hos...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management

Compared 24% of the time

SolarWinds AppOptics vs DX Performance Management

Compared 24% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management

Compared 22% of the time

SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer vs DX Performance Management

Compared 15% of the time

OmniPeek vs DX Performance Management

Compared 15% of the time

More DX Performance Management Competitors

ThousandEyes vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 27% of the time

Marvis Virtual Network Assistant vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 19% of the time

Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 18% of the time

PRTG Enterprise Monitor vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 15% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Compared 11% of the time

More HPE Aruba Networking UXI Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management

October 2025

Download DX Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)

September 2025

Download HPE Aruba Networking UXI product report

Also Known As

CA Performance Management

No data available

Overview

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Broadcom

HPE Aruba Networking UXI offers advanced network monitoring features designed to optimize and enhance user experience within diverse environments. It is particularly beneficial for IT teams seeking to diagnose issues quickly and improve network reliability.

HPE Aruba Networking UXI provides valuable insights into network performance by continuously monitoring and analyzing real-time data. It helps organizations identify potential issues before they impact users, empowering IT teams with timely information to make informed decisions. Its user-friendly interface allows seamless navigation and efficient operation, making it a preferred choice for enterprises looking to maximize network efficiency and end-user satisfaction.

What are the top features of HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

Real-Time Monitoring: Delivers constant data analysis for network optimization.
Proactive Alerts: Provides notifications about potential disturbances.
Dashboard Visualization: Offers easy access to key performance indicators.

What benefits should users expect from HPE Aruba Networking UXI?

Improved Network Performance: Optimize reliability and user experience.
Enhanced Troubleshooting: Quick identification and resolution of network issues.
Increased Operational Efficiency: Reduces time spent on manual monitoring tasks.

HPE Aruba Networking UXI is implemented in industries such as healthcare, finance, and education, offering tailored solutions that address specific networking challenges faced in these sectors. Its high adaptability ensures that organizations can effectively meet their operational demands, ensuring dependable and superior network performance.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. HPE Aruba Networking UXI

September 2025

Free Report: DX Performance Management vs. HPE Aruba Networking UXI

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Performance Management vs. HPE Aruba Networking UXI and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Performance Management vs. HPE Aruba Networking UXI report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.