DigiCert PKI Platform vs Ping Identity Platform comparison

"The most valuable feature is the communication based on PKI certificates."

"I emphasize the importance of automation in Wi-Fi management, particularly in tasks such as certificate renewal. The requirement extends to the ability to generate new certificates from a local server within the data center. There is a need to establish a new server for local certificate issuance and highlights the desire for automation in the deployment process. The emphasis lies in leveraging automated solutions to streamline these operations effectively."

"It provides ease of connecting all our devices."

"The most valuable feature is multifactor authentication."

"I like PingFederate."

"It's convenient for users to log in through Ping using the Kerberos adapter because it doesn't require them to authenticate again."

"The solution is stable. We haven't experienced any bugs or glitches."

"I work on the application onboarding process because we have multiple customers and get data from different sources."

"It gets a mobility portal in place in conjunction with Office 365. It provides very good possibilities and it's much better than other technology that we have used before which was unstable and slower."

"The product's most valuable features include its cloud-based capabilities for handling cloud applications and providing authentication and authorization through OIDC and SAML. It also supports integrations needed for both local and internal applications, including legacy applications requiring web server access."

"From an automation perspective, PKI is a bit of a debatable topic and can be improved as time demands."

"The customer finds value in adopting a platform from Jira, particularly for the ease it brings to their processes, both for on-premises operations and batch processing. Their objective is to create a new customized server specifically designed for generating certificates. This server is intended for the generation of certificates, emphasizing that it is not meant for free domain replacement. The platform of choice for this purpose is Digital One, a product that offers full customization and aligns well with the customer's preference for tailored solutions.The process of certificate issuance from Microsoft's AB involves renewal or replacement every five years. However, an issue arises in that this particular certificate requires renewal annually instead of the standard five-year cycle. The challenge is attributed to personnel changes, where an administrator responsible for the process resigns within the five-year period. To address this, we seeks an automated solution that operates seamlessly with a single sign-on approach, eliminating the need for user IDs or passwords. The automation involves approval and subsequent deployment without complexities. Us, being a partner of DigiSet, relies on their implementer for support in service deployment, installation, and resolution of any issues that may arise."

"We have encountered instances where it is not easy to do authentication."

"PingID classifies the type of environment into internal and external, which is an area for improvement because you need to take additional steps to trust internal and external users."

"PingAccess can only have one token provider, and you cannot enable two different token providers simultaneously."

"The solution should allow for better integration with other platforms and the UBT."

"They could enhance the product's device tracking for better zero-trust security would be beneficial. Currently, it tracks IPs well but lacks detailed device information, which is crucial from a security standpoint."

"Notifications and monitoring are two areas with shortcomings in the solution that need improvement."

"PingID's device management portal should be more easily accessible via a link. They provide no link to the portal like they do for the service. The passwordless functionality could be more comprehensive. You can't filter based on hardware devices. Having that filtering option would be great. Device authentication would be a great feature."

"One significant challenge was ensuring smooth user migration during system upgrades in Ping."

"This solution won't cost much, as this would be free with the licensing from Microsoft."

"I would rate it seven for the price."

"Ping Identity Platform is not very expensive."

"PingID's pricing is pretty competitive."

"Ping offers flexible pricing that's not standardized."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"The platform's value justifies the pricing, especially considering its security features and scalability."

"The tool is quite affordable."

"Ping Identity Platform is not an expensive solution."

"The product is costly."