No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Devo vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.4
Devo enhances efficiency by reducing MTTR, lowering costs, improving security and threat detection, and offering customizable auditing features.
Sentiment score
4.9
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager aids compliance and threat detection, though ROI clarity varies due to costs and licensing model.
I find that using ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) provides a valuable return on investment as it serves as a single point of glass for logs and data analysis.
Cloud Security Archirect at IBM
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.0
Devo's customer service is mixed, praised for responsiveness but criticized for ticket escalation, documentation, and onboarding delays.
Sentiment score
5.4
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager receives mixed reviews, with inconsistent technical support and reliance on self-resolution despite improvements.
I rate the customer support a nine out of ten because of their timely technical guidance and responsiveness during the deployment and troubleshooting periods.
Cyber Security Engineer II (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
I would rate the technical support of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) a nine as they are always available and responsive whenever we open a case.
Cloud Security Archirect at IBM
If I raise a P1 or P0 ticket, the response time is often delayed by four to eight hours.
Senior Security Engineer at Valuepoint Systems
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Devo's scalable cloud infrastructure supports diverse needs, unlimited growth, and is praised for flexibility and a strong support community.
Sentiment score
5.9
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is adaptable but costly, with licensing concerns affecting budget forecasting despite user satisfaction.
Devo is a unified SIEM solution designed to handle growing log volumes and enterprise-scale monitoring requirements.
Cyber Security Engineer II (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
It lacks some capabilities compared to other tools available in the market.
Senior Security Engineer at Valuepoint Systems
It is easy to scale, and I have not encountered any issues when we require more storage or deployment.
Cloud Security Archirect at IBM
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Devo is valued for its high stability and reliability, with minor issues quickly resolved and strong user satisfaction.
Sentiment score
5.1
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager's stability varies by environment, requiring proper setup; recent patches improve performance but challenges persist.
It is stable and reliable for our security operations.
Cyber Security Engineer II (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
I would rate the stability of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) a nine because I have not encountered significant issues, unlike other solutions that sometimes have database errors.
Cloud Security Archirect at IBM
The stability of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is not very robust.
Senior Security Engineer at Valuepoint Systems
 

Room For Improvement

Devo requires improvements in stability, integration, documentation, customization, data handling, and user interface to enhance user experience.
Users seek better reporting, UX, licensing, enhanced performance, integration, automation, AI advancements, and improved support and training.
UI improvements, a simplified dashboard, or an easier reporting workflow could further improve analyst productivity.
Cyber Security Engineer II (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
Integrations with other sandboxes could be improved to better interpret data using AI and machine learning models.
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
I would like to see the detection and response features included in the next release of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM), as security orchestration and automation are increasingly important.
Cloud Security Archirect at IBM
The integration aspect of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) needs improvement.
Senior Security Engineer at Valuepoint Systems
 

Setup Cost

Devo's attractive pricing offers transparency, extended capabilities, and bundled features, but metadata charges may impact overall savings.
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is considered costly, with varied licensing options, and negotiation advised for potential discounts.
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is very cheap compared to other tools.
Senior Security Engineer at Valuepoint Systems
I would rate the pricing of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) around seven, as it varies based on features and demand, making it more affordable for larger organizations, while smaller ones might find it expensive.
Cloud Security Archirect at IBM
 

Valuable Features

Devo offers powerful data visualization, real-time analytics, advanced querying, and ease of integration, enhancing security efficiency across industries.
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager offers versatility, strong vendor support, effective event correlation, and user-friendly integration for enhanced security analysis.
When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins.
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
When the analyst uses queries to search, it pulls the data quickly, in a second, which aids us greatly with the investigation.
Cyber Security Engineer II (Vulnerability & Threat Management) at FICO
The ability to interpret data is highly valued.
Senior Security Engineer at Valuepoint Systems
The log analysis feature is particularly valuable as it allows analysts to interpret intrusion-related logs efficiently.
Cloud Security Archirect at IBM
 

Categories and Ranking

Devo
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
28th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Log Management (26th), IT Operations Analytics (9th), AIOps (18th)
OpenText Enterprise Securit...
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
23rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
99
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Devo is 1.2%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is 1.6%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager1.6%
Devo1.2%
Other97.2%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

FR
Strategic Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Has improved investigative workflows with interactive dashboards and simplified data correlation
The data analytics cloud component focuses on real-time analytics, which is very impressive. The SIEM collects and correlates logs data from different sources and can integrate with ServiceNow, hardware asset management, and software asset management. The security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) is another valuable feature. The security data platform serves as the foundation of Devo. Regarding advanced query capabilities, Devo offers several models including query logs, visual query builder, language integrated query, and SQL, with SQL being the most frequently used querying data capability. The single pane of glass that Devo offers is the SOC. The tools in Devo's active ports are for investigating, not just viewing data. They are more interactive than other market solutions. The drill-down reports capabilities allow analysts to click on any element in a widget. When they see a spike in a line chart for a failed login, which could be a true or false attempt, they can click that spike, and a table widget on the same active board instantly populates with raw logs of data for those specific failed logins. This is particularly important for enterprise companies with numerous endpoints and users. The dynamic filtering of inputs significantly reduces the time cybersecurity analysts spend trying to figure out failed logins and identifying false positives.
SM
Cloud Security Archirect at IBM
Unified log analysis has strengthened incident detection and supports continuous attack simulation
I do not have any areas for improvement in ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) as I have not delved deeply into it; overall, it is a good package. I would like to see the detection and response features included in the next release of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM), as security orchestration and automation are increasingly important.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Manager, Enterprise Risk Consulting at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jun 28, 2015
Qradar vs. ArcSight
Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Construction Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Construction Company
11%
Marketing Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise12
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business37
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise59
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?
Pricing generally depends on the scale, data ingestion requirements, and integrations for what the enterprise monitoring needs. I have not been part of the procurement process, so I am not aware of...
What needs improvement with Devo?
One improvement area for Devo could be simplifying some configuration and improving the onboarding for new analysts because it is quite complex for fresher or new analysts who are handling Devo.UI ...
What is your primary use case for Devo?
Devo serves as our centralized log monitoring, threat investigation, alert monitoring, and security analytics platform. We use it to collect logs from multiple systems so we can correlate the event...
Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?
In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?
I would rate the pricing of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) around seven, as it varies based on features and demand, making it more affordable for larger organizations, while smaller one...
What needs improvement with ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?
I do not have any areas for improvement in ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) as I have not delved deeply into it; overall, it is a good package. I would like to see the detection and respo...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus ArcSight, HPE ArcSight, ArcSight
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel
Lake Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa, and Obrela.
Find out what your peers are saying about Devo vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.