We performed a comparison between Dell RecoverPoint and Symmetrix Remote Data Facility based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Replication solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"We use RecoverPoint for disaster recovery and asynchronous replication, and we use the application at a block level, not the software level. This has been tested, and it's very durable."
"RecoverPoint's most valuable feature is the automatic failover."
"The solution is now Flash-based, which is better. they moved away from Java."
"We've found the support to be very good overall."
"Integration with VMware is the only thing we need to improve. Another feature I'd like to see is the ability to convert management to HTML. And the integration should also be done on the same level."
"The cost of the solution is pretty high. The licensing costs may affect a company's ability to scale."
"RecoverPoint's WAN optimization could be improved."
"If you are new to the product, the initial setup might be a bit difficult."
Dell RecoverPoint is ranked 6th in Data Replication with 3 reviews while Symmetrix Remote Data Facility is ranked 8th in Data Replication with 1 review. Dell RecoverPoint is rated 8.4, while Symmetrix Remote Data Facility is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Dell RecoverPoint writes "It's been tested, and it's very durable ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symmetrix Remote Data Facility writes "Stable with great features and excellent support". Dell RecoverPoint is most compared with Dell AppSync, HVR Software, NetApp SnapMirror and NetApp Snapshot, whereas Symmetrix Remote Data Facility is most compared with NetApp SnapMirror.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
