Dell ProtectPoint [EOL] vs Microsoft DPM comparison

Dell Technologies and Microsoft are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 50% of Dell Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 73% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Dell ProtectPoint [EOL]

Read 2 Dell ProtectPoint [EOL] reviews

50% willing to recommend

Microsoft DPM

Read 21 Microsoft DPM reviews

3,921 Views
3,529 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

Dell ProtectPoint [EOL]

Microsoft DPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 19, 2025

Microsoft DPM and Dell ProtectPoint [EOL] compete in data protection and disaster recovery. Microsoft DPM edges ahead in user satisfaction for setup cost and ROI, while Dell ProtectPoint [EOL] is noted for its features.

Features: Microsoft DPM provides seamless integration with Microsoft services, efficient backup for virtual environments, and easy management. Dell ProtectPoint [EOL] features direct backup from storage arrays, fast restore capabilities, and strong encryption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft DPM offers straightforward deployment, especially for Microsoft users, while Dell ProtectPoint [EOL] integrates with Dell storage, providing extensive customer service. Dell ProtectPoint [EOL] might have a steeper learning curve but benefits large environments with a dedicated service model.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft DPM is viewed as cost-effective with competitive ROI for Microsoft-focused businesses. Dell ProtectPoint [EOL] requires more initial investment due to its features but offers significant benefits for organizations needing comprehensive data protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 910,005 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Dell ProtectPoint [EOL]

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Microsoft DPM

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (41st)

Featured Reviews

Umar-Qureshi

Deputy Manager at Reliance Industries Ltd

Speedy and easy setup but it needs to mature

One way this solution could be improved is if they could come up with better options to migrate. As for what could be included in the next release, we have shared a couple of points with them. First, the account should be more in balance and coordinated with us. They already communicated to our project management team that they are going to implement some of these features. I would definitely recommend this solution. But as time goes on and new features are getting added the product will be more comprehensive.

Read full review

Andrei Kolmogortsev

IT Administrator at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Efficiently manages backups with long-standing reliability and ease of integration

We use Microsoft DPM for backup servers. ManageEngine is used to manage workstations and servers, and Operation Manager is used for monitoring The two-layer backup system is a particularly valuable feature in Microsoft DPM. The short layer and long layer backups are features I appreciate.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One of the features I find most valuable, is the good technical support."

"I would definitely recommend this solution."

"Since I started working with Dell a few months ago, I have found that the solution is very strong."

"The speed and the ease of the initial setup are both good. It is not complex."

"The solution backs up Microsoft workloads as well as anything on the market."

"It has an application backup, a file backup, a system backup and a hypervisor."

"The most valuable feature is that DPM has an index so individual files can be searched."

"One of the most effective features of Microsoft DPM is its integration with the entire Microsoft ecosystem."

"The solution is stable and reliable; it doesn't crash or break down, there aren't bugs or glitches, and it works well."

"I like the core backup feature. I also like the file server backup feature. I find Microsoft DPM interesting because it has fantastic integration with Microsoft products. For example, in Exchange and SharePoint, DPM is excellent when it comes to backing up data. It also does a decent job with open-source products."

"The solution really does great recovery."

"Moving to this solution has improved our backup capability."

More Microsoft DPM pros

Cons

"The interface and documentation need to improve."

"The product has to be more mature, like to be another six to eight months on the market. A lot of maturity needs to be incorporated."

"Sometimes I find that the interface is not as good as it should be."

"The user interface can be improved quite a bit."

"It would be better if it integrated seamlessly with open source and competitor products. In the next release, I would like to see some data governance frameworks. It should have support features for data integration and data replication like Veeam. Right now, we are also using Veeam for certain scenarios."

"Recent minor upgrade required a reboot of all of my protected 2008 servers. This I considered unacceptable as I had to reschedule an outage window to reboot 100+ servers."

"Overall, I wouldn't describe the solution as user-friendly. It's not very intuitive."

"You have only a few settings and if you change them for some special configurations, it's very difficult."

"It needs portability for other vendors. It is good for backing up Microsoft servers, but it doesn't support third-party solutions such as Oracle Database. It depends on Microsoft Volume Shadow Copy, especially for Hyper-V, which has a lot of problems. They should enhance the Volume Shadow Copy functionality. Its reporting should also be better. Reporting is too weak in DPM."

"The DPM is pretty good, but when it comes to external devices, you can't back up to the external device."

"The data tagging feature needs improvement. The solution could be a bit more intuitive in certain aspects."

More Microsoft DPM cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Microsoft DPM is a free solution. However, we pay approximately $3,000 annually for support."

"I think Microsoft DPM pricing is reasonable. The additional costs are related to storage and technical support."

"Microsoft DPM can be considered as an expensive solution for smaller or medium enterprises, but we have been satisfied with the price structure as it is fixed and it offers a variety of useful features"

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft DPM?

The pricing of Microsoft solutions rates in the middle range at five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft DPM?

Microsoft DPM could improve by adding S3 backup to S3 storage capabilities. AI integration is not necessary for backups as this is not a security solution.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft DPM?

We use Microsoft DPM for backup servers. ManageEngine is used to manage workstations and servers, and Operation Manager is used for monitoring.

See all answers

Comparisons

HPE Zerto Software vs Dell ProtectPoint [EOL]

Compared 40% of the time

Oracle Data Guard vs Dell ProtectPoint [EOL]

Compared 36% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Dell ProtectPoint [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

More Dell ProtectPoint [EOL] Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Data Protector vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 6% of the time

Veritas Backup Exec vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 4% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 4% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Microsoft DPM

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft DPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

August 2026

Download Dell ProtectPoint [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft DPM

August 2026

Download Microsoft DPM product report

Also Known As

No data available

DPM, Data Protection Manager, MS DPM

Overview

Dell EMC ProtectPoint technology provides up to 20x faster, more efficient backup and 10x faster recovery while eliminating the backup impact on application servers. By integrating primary storage and industry leading protection storage, ProtectPoint reduces cost and complexity by eliminating traditional backup applications while still providing the benefits of native backups. Overall, ProtectPoint provides the performance of snapshots with the functionality of backups.

Dell Technologies

Microsoft DPM is a comprehensive backup and recovery software that integrates seamlessly with Microsoft applications, providing efficient recovery capabilities and ensuring compatibility across workloads.

Microsoft's Data Protection Manager offers significant integration capabilities with Microsoft applications and Azure Active Directory for Single Sign-On, enhancing scalability through integration with System Center. It supports streamlined backup solutions for both physical and virtual Microsoft environments, with automated operations and a user-friendly interface. While DPM showcases robust file search capabilities, time-saving functionalities, and enhanced security measures, improvements are needed in third-party integrations, backup for external devices, and affordable cloud storage options. Enterprises might face challenges due to complex configurations and limited user-community support.

What are the key features of Microsoft DPM?

Seamless integration with Microsoft Apps: Provides straightforward integration for enhanced operational efficiency.
Efficient Recovery Capabilities: Enables quick data restoration to minimize downtime.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Facilitates Single Sign-On for easier access control.
Compatibility with System Center: Enhances scalability and management efficiency.
Automated Operations: Streamlines backup processes, reducing manual effort.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Strong file search capabilities contribute to data protection.
Time-Saving: Quick recovery processes improve operational efficiency.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies backup management for IT teams.

In industries such as consulting, local government, and data centers, Microsoft DPM plays a critical role in managing backup and recovery operations. Organizations rely on it to safeguard environments, including ERP systems and virtual machines, by supporting daily, weekly, and incremental backups, disaster recovery, and data replication across physical Windows Servers, Hyper-V Servers, SharePoint, and more.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

FieldCore

Medical Park, Centropol Energy, a.s., NCFE, D & H Distributing, Metalor, Colosseum, a.s., Sanitas S.A., Icebreaker

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

910,005 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.