We performed a comparison between Dell PowerEdge M and PowerEdge C based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The networking features for administration and working with the server are valuable."
"The solution offers remarkable flexibility, reliability, and extensive software support."
"The solution is made with high-quality hardware."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution integrated well."
"It helps us to manage multiple chassis from a single website."
"The initial setup is easy."
"I have compared Dell EMC to other solutions and have found it to be good. The SAN and LAN traffic, manageability, and upgradability are all good."
"The initial setup is not complex. It's a user-friendly tool."
"The hybrid solution is much more stable than other products."
"One of the main features that attract customers to buy their products is the great management tool and almost zero failure rate, making it easy to use."
"The security of the product is very good."
"It's a good product. Virtualization on it is good."
"I have found the compression capability the most valuable feature."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The scalability of the solution met our needs."
"Dell PowerEdge M needs to run AMD CPUs on it."
"The set up is complex"
"I would like to have additional HPC and AI capabilities on general Dell PowerEdge servers."
"There is room for improvement in scalability."
"It requires time to transition to the new generation."
"Dell PowerEdge M lacks GPU nodes and doesn't have a direct solution for GPUs."
"More interconnections with third party equipment and limited I/O selection."
"We have had some issues with the vendor's support that we have received. When you open up a support case with Dell they send a partner to assist you and in our experience, they are lacking knowledge about the solution. There are times when you need professional support from the vendor that knows the solution well."
"There has been an increase in quality issues."
"There is some trouble with the stability part of the product, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The product’s pricing could be a little cheaper."
"It should be improved in terms of future expansion. We should be able to have additional free slots for future extensions in terms of memory."
"The need to update the firmware and check if there is any bug in the product is one of the areas where Dell PowerEdge C falls short and needs to make improvements."
"The solution’s pricing could be cheaper."
"A feature that needs to be added is the ability for full container storage."
"The product’s cost needs improvement."
Dell PowerEdge M is ranked 4th in Blade Servers with 14 reviews while PowerEdge C is ranked 5th in Blade Servers with 23 reviews. Dell PowerEdge M is rated 8.4, while PowerEdge C is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Dell PowerEdge M writes "Average pricing and good feature sets but is complex to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PowerEdge C writes "Easy to deploy and has high performance and no downtime". Dell PowerEdge M is most compared with HPE Synergy, HPE Superdome X, Cisco UCS B-Series and Super Micro SuperBlade, whereas PowerEdge C is most compared with Huawei FusionServer X Series, HPE Apollo and Cisco UCS B-Series. See our Dell PowerEdge M vs. PowerEdge C report.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
