Dell PowerEdge M vs Fujitsu CX1000 comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell PowerEdge M
Ranking in Blade Servers
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Fujitsu CX1000
Ranking in Blade Servers
12th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Blade Servers category, the mindshare of Dell PowerEdge M is 21.7%, up from 17.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fujitsu CX1000 is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Blade Servers
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Nasim Hamaydeh - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 25, 2023
A solution with an easy pre-installation and preparation process with a friendly user interface
We primarily use the solution for web services Dell PowerEdge M has a centralized administration for networks; instead of working with standalone servers, you have a centralized administration console. So you can administrate all servers from one location. The networking features for…
Use Fujitsu CX1000?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is budget-friendly. The initial cost for each server was around 10,000 euros. It's a standard price, not too high or too low."
"If we would not have gone with the vendor we might have been charged unnecessarily for packages we did not need."
"The product is neither expensive nor cheap. It is manageable for medium enterprises as well."
"Dell PowerEdge M price is comparable to other solutions but cheaper than IBM. However, the IBM solution is a higher grade solution whereas Dell PowerEdge M is a medium-level solution."
"The solution's pricing is slightly higher."
"It was budget friendly."
"The pricing of PowerEdge Next is higher than it was before."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
11%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Dell PowerEdge M?
The solution's most valuable features are centralized monitoring and management and the ease of upgrading firmware.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Dell PowerEdge M?
The solution's pricing is slightly higher. However, we don't require an additional license for it. The solution's pricing depends on the customer's connectivity requirements, whether 10G, 25G, or 1...
What needs improvement with Dell PowerEdge M?
One area for improvement is VLAN configuration. With Cisco UCS, you apply settings in one place, and they are applied across all the levels. With PowerEdge M, you need to apply them in multiple pla...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
CX1000
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Newport City Homes, Neuroblastoma and Medulloblastoma Translational Research Consortium (NMTRC), Georgian College, AgreeYa Solutions, IIHT Cloud Solutions, Arizona State University, AudienceScience, University of the Incarnate Word (UIW), The Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Holy Cross School
TMC GmbH
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies, Cisco and others in Blade Servers. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.