No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Cycode vs Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 4, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cycode
Ranking in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
11th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (22nd), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (16th), Software Supply Chain Security (10th)
Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint ...
Ranking in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
IT Asset Management (4th), Vulnerability Management (13th), Mobile Device Management (MDM) (5th), Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) (2nd), Mobile Threat Defense (4th), Patch Management (3rd), Attack Surface Management (ASM) (15th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (4th), Autonomous Endpoint Management (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2014131 - PeerSpot reviewer
DevSecOps Security Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Secret scanning has strengthened our code security and now needs better container integration
Regarding container scanning, Cycode can be improved as it does not have a CLI. As a DevSecOps professional, having a CLI is a must-have for any tool to integrate it into systems. Although Cycode does have a CLI, specifically for the container scanning module, a CLI does not exist. This is why all the modules that Cycode offers cannot be fully leveraged. A CLI for the container scanning module is believed to be on Cycode's roadmap, but it is not available today. As a big enterprise dealing with many assets, Cycode being faster would be beneficial. With many assets on-boarded on Cycode, the tool sometimes becomes slow. Making Cycode faster would definitely help. Other than that, things are good.
reviewer2882148 - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Automated onboarding has saved hundreds of hours and now standardizes device security globally
In terms of how Ivanti Neurons for UEM can be improved, I think there's potential for automation of some repetitive tasks. The device provisioning process has already become very close to zero-touch, but the patch deployment is still scheduled and policy-driven. As a result, I believe we can reduce endpoint administration further. I also think the number of integrations and the scalability of the tool can be improved, along with customer service, as we've encountered some issues in certain countries. Regarding the needed improvements, particularly concerning integrations or customer service challenges, we have had problems with integration with some third-party tools requiring additional configuration and testing. Occasionally, we also experienced delays between systems, particularly with user group changes and device compliance updates. The accuracy and reliability of output from Ivanti's AI can be improved. We notice that the AI-driven insights are useful, but there are anomalies and some false positives. Since we are still in a validation period, I cannot provide a definitive mark, but I believe that accuracy should be enhanced, especially for more complex and environment-specific issues where human intervention is still needed.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"In my experience as an integrator with Cycode, the biggest advantage is that it is platform agnostic and language agnostic."
"Cycode has positively impacted the organization by saving time in the pipeline and providing one platform for secret scanning, SAST, and Infrastructure as Code facilities."
"Cycode excels in secret scanning and is brilliant at finding and identifying secrets within code."
"The remote device management feature has helped our remote work strategy because manual intervention is not needed, allowing us to have real-time insights, policy enforcement, and strong security with patch management."
"This product helps us to create a streamlined process and it is working as expected."
"I experience every day how the unified platform has really optimized IT and security operations processes since patch management automatically patches the vulnerabilities."
"For those looking into using Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management, I would recommend just going for it, as it is the best tool available in the market right now with all the features, and despite needing a few improvements, I encourage people to use it."
"The user interface is user-friendly."
"Ivanti Neurons for UEM has positively impacted my organization by providing customers with tools to scan, perform remote desktop functions, conduct patch analysis, and manage software deployment along with network scanning."
"The technical support from Ivanti is good."
"A positive impact of using Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management on my organization is the ability to perform mass updates in the environment, as today we are able to update hundreds of thousands of computers at once."
 

Cons

"Currently, Cycode does not have good container security, and while it is a full solution, companies desiring a single platform must seek additional tools to scan container images."
"Regarding container scanning, Cycode can be improved as it does not have a CLI."
"While I appreciate the advantages of Cycode, one area for improvement is the machine learning aspect and how it can assist during AI operations."
"We would like the initial setup to be simpler."
"In terms of improvement, I would recommend better documentation. During the time I used it, there were issues with up-to-date patching, and the documentation around those specific errors was quite confusing."
"Regarding Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management agent in general, it can seem somewhat laggy."
"Reporting needs improvement. It is not very useful and lacks depth."
"It's a difficult configuration because you need to install many servers in a location, and you have to install the primary server in the main location."
"Ivanti Patch could be improved with better integration with other cloud solutions."
"From my perspective of having just moved away from the product, I would probably give it a six."
"Sometimes I find that the reporting in Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is too detailed, and I would appreciate the ability to customize my reporting a little bit more."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"While the price is a bit high, it may be equitable with the features one gets with the product, such as that involving the interface."
"For the one that works with SCCM, it is relatively inexpensive at $8 USD per node, yearly. The standalone product has two versions; the one that patches servers is about $45 USD annually and the version that patches workstations is about half that price at $22 USD."
"The solution is affordable."
"The license can get expensive if you have a lot of nodes."
"The price of MobileIron UEM is very good."
"The solution is expensive compared to other products."
"My impression is that MobileIron is very expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
26%
Financial Services Firm
11%
University
6%
Construction Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise33
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cycode?
I find the pricing of Cycode to be reasonable for the work being done, although I haven't compared it with other tools to provide detailed feedback about its affordability.
What needs improvement with Cycode?
While I appreciate the advantages of Cycode, one area for improvement is the machine learning aspect and how it can assist during AI operations. This tool needs capabilities for monitoring cloud co...
What is your primary use case for Cycode?
Cycode is used for our software development, maintaining clean code quality, and managing secrets within our enterprise. We write secure code by adhering to secure coding principles, ensuring that ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management has been pretty easy and straightforward. We have excellent service from our sales rep and also have ...
What needs improvement with Ivanti Neurons for UEM?
There are many features that can be integrated with Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management. The event log viewer can be made significantly better so that we can export logs, view them properly, and ...
What is your primary use case for Ivanti Neurons for UEM?
Our main use case for Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management is to perform Windows patching and third-party application patching to set up an automated schedule so that all the endpoints are updated...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Ivanti Neurons for Patch Management,Ivanti Neurons for RBVM,Ivanti Neurons for VULN KB,Ivanti Mobile Threat Defense,Ivanti Neurons for Spend Intelligence, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, Ivanti Neurons for EASM
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Frontier Airlines
Find out what your peers are saying about Cycode vs. Ivanti Autonomous Endpoint Management and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.